Civ Pro Flashcards
PJ - Overview
- Can P sue D ~in this state~?
- 2-Step Analysis:
1. Satisfy a statute (just mention and move on), AND
2. Satisfy constitutional DP
PJ - Con DP - Overview
D must have “such minimum contacts with the forum so jx does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”
- 3 factors:
(a) Contact
(b) Relatedness
(c) Fairness
PJ - Con DP - Factors
- Contact:
(a) Purposeful availment - D reaching out to forum
(b) Foreseeability - D foresees getting sued in forum - Relatedness - Does P’s claim arise from D’s contact?
(a) If so => Specific PJ
(b) If no => General PJ IF D “at home” in forum - Person always at home in domicile
- Includes tag jx (voluntarily present)
- Corp at home: (1) Where incorporated, AND (2) PPB
- Fairness - ONLY for Specific PJ; factors:
(a) Burden on D and witnesses = severe disadvantage for D
(b) State’s interest (always true if P’s a citizen of the forum)
(c) Plaintiff’s interest
Notice/Service - Overview
- D entitled to notice “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the action
- Document reqs:
(1) Summons, AND
(2) Copy of the complaint
Notice/Service - Details
- Who can serve? - Any nonparty >= 18 yo
- When? - In US, 90 days after filing complaint
- How?
(a) On person in US: - Personal service - Given to D personally anywhere
- ** Substituted service - (1) At D’s usual above [where living now], AND (2) To someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there
- *** Service on D’s agent - OK if in scope of agency
-
** State law methods - OK to use method of state (1) where fed court sits, OR (2) where service is made
(b) On a bus/org in US: - Officer, managing or general agent
- State law methods - OK to use method of state (1) where fed court sits, OR (2) where service is made
(c) On minor/incompetent in US - Any method permitted by law of state where service is made
(d) In foreign country:
(a) Int’l agreement (e.g. Hague)
(b) As directed by US court
(c) If reasonably calculated to give notice:
- State law methods - OK to use method of state (1) where fed court sits, OR (2) where service is made
- Method allowed by foreign law
- ** Method directed by foreign official in response to letter rogatory
- *** Personal service therein (unless prohibited)
- ** Mail sent by clerk of US court requiring signed receipt
- Waiver - Mail to D a notice and request to waive, including copy of complaint and 2 copies of waiver form, w prepaid return. D returns in 30 days (or 60 outside US).
(a) Waiver =/ waiver of defenses
SMJ - Diversity - Overview
Requirements:
(1) Case is either (a) bw citizens of different states, OR (b) bw a citizen of a state and a citizen of a foreign country, AND
(2) Amount if controversy >$75k
SMJ - Diversity - Citizenship
- Complete Diversity Rule - No diversity of ANY P is citizen of same state as ANY D
(a) NB: No alienage if green card alien is domiciled in same state as litigant on other side - Citizenship of natural person
(a) Citizenship = domicile - Domicile requires (1) physical presence, AND (2) intent to make that your home
- Citizenship of corp - (1) State where incorporated, AND (2) State w PPB/nerve center
- Citizenship of unincorporated assn - Citizenship of all of its members
SMJ - Diversity - AIC
- Look only at claim itself
- Good faith claims are OK UNLESS clear to a LEGAL CERTAINTY that recovery can’t exceed $75k
- Aggregation - Can aggregate claims of any ONE P against any ONE D
(b) BUT w joint claims (e.g. joint tortfeasors), # of parties irrelevant - Equitable relief - Meets AIC req if EITHER:
(a) P views cost to itself as >$75k
(b) D views complying w injunction as >$75k
SMJ - Fed Court Exclusions
Divorce, alimony, child custody, and to probate and estate
SMJ - Fed Q
- P’s claim “arises under” federal law
* Well-pleaded complaint rule - Ask if P is enforcing a federal right
SMJ - Removal
- Always about D removing, NOT P
- When? - No later than 30 days of service (NOT filing) of the first paper that shows the case is removable (often complain)
- Who must join? - All Ds who have been served w process
(a) Timing note - New service starts 30-day clock anew - What cases?
(a) Diversity - EXCEPT: (1) If any D is a citizen of the forum, OR (2) >1 year after the case was filed (e.g. P drops claim against in-state D in good faith)
(b) Fed Q
- EXCEPT: (1) If any D is a citizen of the forum, OR (2) >1 year after the case was filed (e.g. P drops claim against in-state D in good faith)
- To what fed court? - Fed district “embracing” the state court
- Process:
1. D files notice in fed court stating grounds, attaching all docs served on her
2. D serves a copy of notice
3. D files copy of notice in state court
4. If P wants remand:
(a) For reason OTHER than lack of SMJ - Move within 30 days
(b) For lack of SMJ - Move anytime
SMJ - Supplemental
- Deals w getting CLAIMS into a fed court case that don’t invoke diversity or fed q
- EACH claim must have fed SMJ. If no diversity or fed q => supplemental
- Test = “Common nucleus of operative fact”
(a) ALWAYS met when claim arises from same “transaction or occurrence”
(b) LIMIT - In DIVERSITY case, claims by P CANNOT invoke supplemental - ** EXCEPTION - If multiple Ps and claim by 1 doesn’t meet AIC
- Discretion - Can deny supplemental if state law claim is complex or state law issues would “predominate”
Law Applied - Erie
Step 1 - Is there some fed law on point that directly conflicts w state law? If so, apply if valid (“arguably procedural”; all FRCP valid).
Step 2 - If no fed law on point, apply state law IF issue to be decided is substantive. Substantive:
(a) Elements of a claim or defense
(b) SoL
(c) Rules for tolling SoL
(d) Conflict/choice of law rules
(e) Standard for granting new trial bc damages excessive/inadequate
Step 3 - If no fed law on point and issue not one of 5 above, determine if issue is substantive. Factors to weigh:
(a) Outcome determinative - If so, more likely substantive
(b) Balance of interests
(c) Avoiding forum shopping
Law Applied - FCL
- No general FCL
* But, e.g., preclusive effect of federal judgments, int’l relations, admiralty, disputes bw states, Bivens actions
Venue - Overview
- WHICH federal court
- Any district where:
(a) All Ds reside, OR
(b) A substantial part of the claim arose - DOES NOT apply to removed cases
Venue - Residence
- If D doesn’t reside in US, venue OK everywhere
- If all Ds reside in diff districts of the forum state, venue OK in a district where any D resides
- Humans - Reside in district where domiciled
- Business - All districts where subject to PJ
Venue - Transfer
- Can transfer to transferee that’s a proper venue and has PJ over D (without waiver by D)
- Choice of law - Transferee applies law of transferor UNLESS (1) transfer bc forum selection clause, OR (2) transferor was improper venue
- 2 transfer statutes:
(1) If original district is proper venue, can transfer based on convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice - Look for factors sowing transferee is “center of gravity”
(2) If original district is IMproper venue, court may transfer in the interest of justice OR dismiss
Venue - Forum Non Conveniens
- Other court IN DIFFERENT JUDICIAL SYSTEM is center of gravity, so court dismisses or stays the case. Transfer is impossible.
- Other could must be available and adequate
(a) Adequate UNLESS P can get NO remedy
Pleadings - Complaint
- Requirements:
(1) Statement of grounds of SMJ,
(2) Short and plain statement of claim showing entitlement to relief, AND
(3) Demand for relief sought - Standard - Twombly/Iqbal facts supporting a plausible claim
(a) Claims requiring pleading w particularity/specificity: Fraud, Mistake, Special Damages