Civ Pro Flashcards

1
Q

COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION

A

A. Filing – commences civil action by filing in federal district courts
B. Pre-Filing Notice Requirements – generally not, but:
1. Federal Tort Claims – must be submitted administratively b4 suit commenced; if feds reject tort claim notice or fail to make final decision w/in 6 months, P can sue
2. Waiver – failure to comply w/pre-filing notice affirmative defense, but D waives if not timely asserted, or if asserted by then starts discovery or other conduct inconsistent w/seeking dismissal
C. Relationship to Service – 120 days after filing to serve; miss deadline, suit disappears, SOL blown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

JURISDICTION AND SERVICE

A

“A court must have personal jurisdiction over the parties to the suit through 1) notice (service of process by a person 18 or older who is not a party to the litigation), and 2) minimum contacts with forum state (physical presence, residency, long-arm statute).”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Service of Process

A

method to serve formal notice & opportunity to be heard; establish PJ; “to satisfy due process requirements, notice must be “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances” to reach the intended person. Mullane.”

	1. Waiver of Service – P mails D copy of summons & complaint, request to waive service of process via 1st class mail; can also waive by K; if D refuses to waive, court can impose costs
	2. Personal Service on Individuals – in state where DC sits
		a. Delivery to the Person – hand it to D anywhere w/in state
		b. Abode – leave w/resident of D’s home of suitable age and discretion
		c. Who May Serve Papers – anyone 18+ not a party to suit
		d. Territorial Limits – w/in the state or 100 miles of federal courthouse
		d. Community Property Considerations – service on either spouse should be sufficient for both; to be safe Ps normally serve both spouses
	3. Service by Publication – if D has fled service, concealed herself; general not OK if D’s name and address attainable
	4. Service on the Federal Government – 1) personal or certified mail of USA’s office in district where action filed; 2) copy of summons & complain to US Attorney General
	5. Service on Corporations and Other Business Associations – required by law to have registered agent to accept service; does not mean you have consented to PJ by having agent in state
	6. Service in Specific Situations – in rem, serving a foreign government
	7. Service After Initial Service of Process – of other documents in suit, usually done electronically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Minimum Contacts (General Jurisdiction)

A

required in addition to service of process to establish PJ

	1. Generally – DC cannot assumed PJ over D unless D has minimum contacts w/state where DC sits
	2. Domicile – general jdx over people domiciled in state, even if temporarily left
	3. No Contacts, But In-State Service Obtained – “tag service” upon resident of another state who is served in-state. Burnham.
	4. Consent or Waiver – D consents/fails to challenge PJ in pre-answer motion or answer. FRCP 12.
	5. Consent by Contract – “parties consent to personal jurisdiction in Alaska”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Long-Arm Statutes (Specific Jurisdiction)

A
  1. Generally – party submits to PJ in a state by engaging in specific conduct; commonly:
    a. Business –transact biz in state
    b. Tort – commit tort in state
    c. Property – own property in state
    d. Insurance – if insurance contracts to insure someone in state
    2. Jurisdiction is Specific to In-state Activity – only give jdx to hear dispute tightly related to presence in state; e.g., dispute must arise from business transaction used to assert PJ proper
    3. Transacting Business – purposeful availment of D to the jurisdiction of forum state
    a. Factors Considered – 1) nonresident D or foreign corp must purposefully act or consummate some transaction in forum state; active is enough, passive not; advertising not enough, having store in state is; 2) COA arises from act or transaction in state; 3) must not “offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”
    b. Physical Presence not Required – D need not be physically in state; phone, mail solicitations may support jurisdiction
    c. Internet Transactions – test: how “active” is the website? Soliciting business and taking orders = PJ; providing information = generally no PJ
    d. Registered Agent Distinguished – not enough to establish minimum contacts if agent appointed merely to accept service of process; serving CEO while in state still confers though
    4. Commission of Tort
    a. Generally – D commits in state, jdx usually attaches; look for car crashes on exam
    b. Products Liability Cases – P must show that D placed products in “stream of commerce” and it was reasonably foreseeable that corporation’s products would end up in the foreign state; still ask if it’s “fair” to bring corporation into state
    5. Ownership or Use of Property – jurisdiction ONLY to resolve disputes over D’s ownership or use of in-state property
    6. Insuring Risk – when out-of-state D insures in-state P; P will attempt to collect policy
    7. Full Jurisdiction Obtained – if requirements of long-arm statute met & minimum contacts exist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Challenges to Personal Jurisdiction, Consolidation, and Waiver

A

PJ can be waived

	1. Appearance – not waiver of PJ; waiver if not objected to by motion or answer FRCP 12
	2. Method – object by motion in first pleading, filed before answer; or answer to complaint
	3. Exception – motions for default; longer time to vacate for lack of PJ FRCP 60
	4. Timeliness, Consolidation – FRCP 12 applies
	5. Waiver 
		a. By Waiting Too Long to Move for Dismissal – timely object by motion or in answer; must move to dismiss w/in reasonable time and not engage in inconsistent behavior after 12(b)
		b. By Seeking Affirmative Relief – theory is D has consented to jurisdiction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In Rem Jurisdiction

A

real property provides minimum contacts where PJ otherwise unattainable; notice & opportunity to be heard still required; generally supplanted by long-arm statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

A

authority of court to adjudicate a particular dispute; not waivable

	1. Federal Question – arising under the laws, treaties, or Constitution of the US; 28 USC 1331
	2. Diversity Jurisdiction – controversies between citizens of different states in matters >$75k; state citizenship is of time of filing of suit; of child or decedent, not personal representative; complete diversity required; in class actions, named Ps must all be diverse from Ds, at least one of named Ps must have claim >$75k; 28 USC 1332
	3. Supplemental Jurisdiction – federal courts that have proper jdx over one claim often have proper jdx over supplemental state law claims so long as they are part of the “same case or controversy” or “common nucleus of operative fact” 28 USC 1367
	4. Removal Jurisdiction – D of claim from state court to federal court; must do so w/in 30 days; if DJ only basis for removal, can’t remove if was filed in state where at least one D is a citizen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Venue and Change of Venue

A

which federal district court is proper to hear; generally note “assuming venue is proper” when answering question that doesn’t focus on venue

	1. Basis – for establishing proper venue
		a. Residence of D – any D resides in state where DC located
		b. Location of Events or Property – where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated” 28 USC 1391
		c. Personal Jurisdiction – if no other district proper, venue proper in DC where D subject to PJ
	2. Actions Against Corporations – corporate D’s residence is district of incorporation or where its headquarters are located. Hertz.
	3. Improper Venue – courts can transfer or dismiss if P files in improper venue
	4. Forum Non Conveniens – compelling reason why case should be heard somewhere else; center of gravity of lawsuit far away, would be a hardship to have parties, witnesses attend; courts can also take into consideration docket issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Complaint and Answer

A

FRCP 3

	1. Complaint Contents – JARR – signed by attorney of record
		a. Jurisdiction – allege SMJ and PJ
		b. Allegation of Facts – plausibility required (notice pleading) – FRCP 8
		c. Right to Relief – legal theory specified (tort, breach of K); statute based on
		d. Relief Requested – specify remedy requested
	2. Joinder of Claims – P is the “mistress of her complaint”; can assert multiple claims even if they don’t all arise out of one transaction or occurrence; court can sever later
	3. Single Complaint – all claims arising out of same T/O must be asserted; no “claim splitting”
	4. Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss – lack of jdx, insufficient service, failure to join a party, 12(b)(6); no special appearance by D necessary; deficiency not waived by filing motion to dismiss
	5. Answer – D must serve w/in 21 days (60 if D outside US); 60 if D waived service (90 if outside US); denials may be based on lack of knowledge; affirmative defenses expressly pleaded
	6. Post-Answer Motion to Dismiss – motion for summary judgment filed w/or after answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Notice Pleading

A

FRCP 8; plausible allegations required; Iqbal, Twombly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pleading Special Matters

A

fraud, breach of trust, denial of capacity pled specifically; special damages specified in complaint [FRCP 9]; affirmative defenses specially pleaded [FRCP 8(c)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Signing of Pleadings, Sanctions

A

complaint signed by attorney of record; frivolous claims sanctioned if not warranted by existing law or brought in good faith [FRCP 11]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Challenges to the Pleadings

A

FRCP 12

	1. In General – in answer or motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [12(b)(6)], judgment on the pleadings [12(c)], or to strike invalid defense or redundant matter [12(f)]
	2. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State Claim – FRCP 12(b)(6)
		a. Purpose – allow D to avoid baseless claims
		b. Drastic Remedy – granted sparingly; denies P her day in court
		c. Truth Inference – factual allegations contained in complaint assumed to be true; have to challenge PJ, venue, service of process in 1st 12(b) motion; consolidate all defenses; SMJ not waived
		d. Amendment Allowed – of complaint by P in lieu of dismissing
		e. Too Vague – complaint too vague to satisfy due process notice of fact & nature of claim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Consolidation and Waiver of Certain Defenses

A

FRCP 12

	1. In General – certain defenses must be timely asserted and consolidated or are deemed waived
	2. FRCP 12 Defenses – 1) lack of SMJ; 2) lack of PJ; 3) lack of minimum contacts; 4) improper venue; 5) failure to state a claim; 6) failure to join indispensible party
	3. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction – can be raised at any time, even after judgment
	4. Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or Improper Venue
		a. Challenge by Motion – prior to filing answer
		b. Challenge in Answer – if included, D can wait and file actual motion to dismiss/change venue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Counterclaims

A

D → P; FRCP 13

	1. Compulsory – arising out of the same T/O as P’s claim; can’t be brought separately; P’s complaint tolls SOL on any compulsory counterclaim
	2. Permissive – arise from separate set of facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Crossclaim

A

D → D; anything on same side of lawsuit between people similarly situated; FRCP 13

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Amended Pleadings

A

FRCP 15

	1. Generally – before a responsive pleading served; or w/in 21 days if no responsive pleading yet
	2. Leave of Court – generally liberally granted; will deny when BUUF: Bad faith; Undue delay; Unfair prejudice; Futility
	3. Claims, Defenses, or Parties – once properly in court, court likely to allow you to add new claims or defenses (i.e., based on discovery); MUCH LESS LIKELY to allow new parties 
	4. Relating Back – whether amendment relates back to date of initial pleading (for SOL purposes)
		a. New Claim or Defense – relates back if arises out of same T/O
		b. New Party – relates back only if 1) new party arises out of same transaction/occurrence; 2) new party must have notice; 3) not unfair to add party b/c party knew or should have known that but for mistaken identity, claim would have been brought against him
		c. New Party − Restriction – does not relate back if amendment necessitated by inexcusable neglect or result of conscious decision of P
		d. New Party − Practical Effect – claims against new D almost never relate back if would have otherwise been barred by SOL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Appearance and Default

A

FRCP 55 – default judgment prevents losing party from asserting defenses might have otherwise been raised and compulsory counterclaims; preclusive if court had proper jdx over D, and D had proper notice & opportunity to appear

	1. General Overview – if D fails to timely respond, P entitled to default judgment; need not give D notice of default
	2. Appearance – if D has “appeared,” P must give D notice of default; D can prevent by serving and filing answer before hearing on P’s motion; “appears” = attorney’s notice of appearance, informal negotiations if D aware of P’s claim and intended to defend against it
	3. Entry and Judgment Amount – court can order hearings if uncertain; award what requested by P
	4. Protection for Members of Military – tolls SOL against them as to default judgment
	5. Motion to Vacate – In General – FRCP 60(b); claw your way back in
	6. Motion to Vacate – for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction – if filed by D w/in reasonable time
	7. Motion to Vacate – Other – typically based on D’s admission of error; losing summons
		a. Meritorious Defense – that would have asserted but for quick entry of default; likely to vacate if not much time has passed
		b. Reason for D’s Failure to Appear – stubbornness or failure to appreciate summons not OK; misunderstanding or miscommunication between attorneys, clients, parties OK 
		c. D’s Diligence – court less inclined to grant if D doesn’t timely move to vacate
		d. Effect Upon P – if vacating default would prejudice P; e.g., crucial evidence no longer there
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

FRCP 17

A
  1. Real Party in Interest – straightforward on bar exam; P has to have “standing”; common sense
  2. Capacity – adults of sound mind, otherwise must sue through GAL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Compulsory Joinder of Indispensable Parties

A

FRCP 19

	1. Generally – necessary, indispensable parties; can also make Rule 12(b) motion for failure to join indispensable party
	2. Complete Relief – can’t be accorded among parties w/out joined party’s presence (e.g., all parties to a K; however joint tortfeasors are never indispensable parties)
	3. Rights Are Being Adjudicated – person claims an interest in action and must be party to adequately represent interests, or protect interest of those who are already parties
		a. Indispensable Parties – parties to a K; named insureds
		b. Parties Who Are Not Indispensable – joint tortfeasors
	4. Procedure – if parties don’t comply voluntarily, court will order joinder
	5. Dismissal in Absence of Indispensable Party – if action can’t proceed “in equity and good conscience”; can’t be joined if person not subject to service of process or venue improper
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Permissive Joinder of Parties

A

FRCP 20

	1. Common Question of Law or Fact – claims from same transaction & occurrence, involving common question of law or fact; liberal: encourages all interested parties to join
	2. Separate Trials – if presence of party would cause embarrassment, undue expense, prejudice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Impleader

A

FRCP 14

	1. Generally – D brings 3d party claim against someone else
	2. Procedure – D1 impleads by serving summons & 3d party complaint; on exam note “assuming that they comply with the rules of service of process of the summons and complaint
	3. Insurer as Party – generally not a 3d party D in tort cases
24
Q

Addition or Substitution of Parties

A

FRCP 25

	1. Addition – subject to FRCP 15
	2. Procedure on Addition – served w/summons and complaint in same manner as original D
	3. Substitution – of new party for original party when original party dies, incompetent, transfers interests, no longer in position (government); court has broad authority to order
25
Q

Class Actions

A

FRCP 23

	1. Generally – still need SMJ through DJ or CAFA (minimal diversity (one named P from Ds), aggregate amount in controversy > $5m)
	2. Requirements – CULP
		a. Common Questions – Commonality; high level of cohesion of Ps’ claims; 23(a); Wal-Mart.
		b. Usual Claim – Typicality
		c. Large Membership – Numerosity; +20 in DJ; +100 in CAFA
		d. Protection – Adequacy of representation; lawyers good, named rep will adequately rep absent class members
	3. Examples – close question on bar exam: certification usually not appropriate, look for a form K
	4. Additional Factors
		a. Risks of Separate Actions – is class action superior device?
		b. Conduct of Opposing Party – whether appropriate to give injunctive relief to opposing side
		c. Common Questions – questions common to class must predominate
	5. Notice Requirements 
		a. In “Common Questions” – best notice practicable, including individualized notice where possible; absent members can opt out and pursue own individualized relief
		b. Not in “Common Questions” – common fund, Ps given notice but not allowed to opt out
26
Q

Intervention

A

FRCP 24; convince court that you will be practically and importantly affected by outcome of litigation; more than de minimus; treated as party to suit same as other parties; would be denied if will prejudice the parties or proceedings already before the court; ability to reopen past issues will depend on whether or not you should have been in the lawsuit in the first place

27
Q

Methods and Scope of Discovery

A
  1. Methods – PRIDE – Production of documents; Request for admission; Interrogatories; Depositions; Examinations (physical, mental)
    2. Timing and Sequence – absent court order or local rule, can proceed in any manner, speed after initial discover conference; mention that there is a local rule that may impact discovery order
    3. Discovery vs. Ex Parte Contacts – have to deal w/counsel; no inappropriate ex parte contact when compiling discovery; covers witnesses and experts; fact witness, lower-level EEs rules are relaxed a bit
    4. Scope of Discovery Generally – discovery rules are broad and liberal, and the scope is much broader than what would likely be admissible at trial; requires only that it be relevant, likely to lead to admissible evidence (thumb on the scale for discoverable)
    5. Privileges Apply – attorney-client; attorney work product most tested
    6. Protective Orders – to bar or limit discovery of certain documents that are DUOP – Duplicative, Unduly burdensome, Oppressive, or Protect secret processes, trade secrets (most common)
  2. Work-Product
    8. Insurance Availability – insurance Ks part of mandatory discovery, inadmissible as evidence of liability or negligence
    9. Using FOIA in Lieu of Discovery – when P has suit v. federal government; scope not broader
28
Q

Work-Product

A

a. What is Protected – documents, intangible items, photos, videos, charts, etc.; if prepared at request of attorney, protected; physical object itself is protected, but facts w/in are not, source of document; e.g., having access to the same witness
b. In Anticipation of Litigation – protected material must be produced in anticipation of any suit; even if not in process, potential is enough; hiring investigator/consultant protected
c. Distinguish from Attorney-Client Privilege – narrow category of communications; confidential communications between attorney and client; always applies
d. Court-Ordered Disclosure – showing “substantial need” will override work-product privilege; only source of the information
e. Legal Malpractice – no protections if work product directly at issue
f. Waiver by Disclosure to Witnesses – open door by showing witnesses work product; opposing counsel has right to examine/introduce materials used to refresh witnesses memories
g. Attorney’s Thought Processes – impressions, legal theories, strategies protected

29
Q

Discovery With Regard to Experts

A
  1. Testifying – can depose, cross-examine; qualified under Daubert; may be required to disclose subject matter, substance of opinion, grounds thereto
    2. Consulting – generally can take no discovery from a consulting expert; attorney work product
    3. Fact or “Occurrence” – lay/fact witnesses; not rising to Daubert level, but expertise based on factual involvement in case, not technological/scientific know-how
30
Q

Initial Disclosures

A

FRCP 26(a); list of things that must be disclosed w/in 14 days of initial discovery conference; intended to keep courts from having to monitor too closely: witnesses w/discoverable information, physical & electronic docs, tangible things a party may rely on, numerical computations of damages, expert’s qualifications, compensation, opinions, bases thereof

31
Q

Depositions

A

FRCP 30, 45

	1. Subpoena – from court where suit filed to gain power over deponent; subpoena duces tecum requires deponent to show up w/documents/evidence; parties can file to quash subpoenas
	2. Recording Testimony – typically videotaped now
	3. Transcript – testimony under oath; submitted to witness to make corrections prior to publication
	4. Conduct During Depositions – supposed to be professional; only object to privilege, form of Q or request protective order from court
	5. Use of Deposition as Evidence at Trial – hearsay; usually admissible under FRE 801 to impeach
32
Q

Interrogatories

A

FRCP 33

	1. Generally – written questions that have to be answered w/in 30 days; answers constitute admissions, not hearsay
	2. Scope of Inquiry – discovery scope applies; inquire about facts, not law
33
Q

Production of Documents

A

FRCP 34; request for documents have to be answered w/in 30 days; must provide location and access; a lot of discovery is done electronically now

34
Q

Physical and Mental Examinations

A

FRCP 35; possible for anyone who places physical/mental state at issue; agreed to by stipulation or ordered by court for good cause

35
Q

Requests for Admission

A

FRCP 36; deemed admitted if not affirmatively denied or objected to w/in 30 days; failure to respond timely = admission; can’t ask for an admission on pure issue of law

36
Q

Supplementation of Responses

A

FRCP 26(e) – no party generally has duty to supplement unless:

	1. Materially Incomplete or Incorrect – fuzzy standard
	2. Not Already Rectified – has not already been provided via other discovery, writing
37
Q

Discovery Abuse

A

POSE – court may impose discovery sanctions [FRCP 37]; must show tried to work it out w/counsel before moving for protective order

	1. Protective Orders – limit scope of discovery based on applicable law
	2. Orders Compelling Discovery – where party resists requests for discovery
	3. Sanctions for Violation of Order – if party refuses to comply w/protective order or compelling
		a. Discretion – broad; exclude evidence, find party in contempt, order payment of costs, fees
		b. Scale of Severity – costs & fees routine; harsher require explicit findings
		c. Ultimate Sanctions – dismissal w/prejudice for P; default for D
	4. Exclusion of Witness – if party fails to ID prior to trial, court can exclude
38
Q

Spoliation

A

duty to retain relevant info arises when it becomes apparent that opposing party has legal claim or defense likely involving evidence at issue

	1. In General – intentional destruction dealt w/harshly; sanctions and refusal to admit evidence
	2. Negative Inference – at minimum jury can draw negative inference from evidence of destruction; opposing counsel should receive a jury instruction
	3. Electronically Stored Documents – emails and text messages; social media, any digital evidence
	4. Implications for Practice – never destroy or advise client to do so
	5. Civil vs. Criminal Cases – state’s duty to preserve exculpatory evidence is D’s right to DP
39
Q

Preliminary Equitable Relief

A

FRCP 65(a) – Preliminary injunction; both parties present

	1. Requirements – RAMP
		a. Risk of Irreparable Harm – no adequate remedy at law; i.e., $ damages inadequate
		b. Appropriate Weight of Harm Distribution – P’s harm outweighs D’s harm if restrained
		c. Merits Success Likelihood – P likely to succeed on merits
		d. Public Interest – whether preliminary injunction will harm
	2. Temporary Restraining Order – issues if irreparable harm will occur before notice & opportunity to be heard; can petition ex parte 
		a. Showing Required – affidavit setting forth reasons why TRO should issue, efforts to notify opposing party and why it didn’t work
		b. Limited Duration – only 10 days before full briefing and consideration
40
Q

Dismissals

A
  1. Voluntary Dismissal – FRCP 41(a); by P unless D has asserted counterclaim, served answer, filed motion for SJ; 1st voluntary dismissal w/out prejudice, 2nd w/prejudice
    2. Involuntary Dismissal – FRCP 42(b); by D for failure to prosecute, undue delay, comply w/civil rule, comply w/court order; move @ close of P’s case; dismissal is w/prejudice
    3. Coordination With Statute of Limitations – dismissed under 41=treated as if never brought for SOL purposes; not tolled
41
Q

Summary Judgment

A

FRCP 56

  1. Motion – must show: 1) case presents no genuine issue of material fact; and 2) moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; 1=jury (Q of fact), 2=judge (Q of law)
  2. Issue of Material Fact
    a. Affirmative Showing – party opposing has to show case involves one or more genuine issue of material fact; evidence viewed in light most favorable to non-moving party
    b. Materiality – inconsequential issues do not preclude SJ
    c. Admissible Evidence – only consider evidence admissible at trial
    d. Self-Contradiction – cannot create genuine issue of material fact by self-contradicting
    e. Credibility – not considered (in theory and on bar exam)
    f. Typical Factual Issues – negligence, proximate cause, reasonableness, state of mind
    g. Any Doubt – in favor of trial
    3. Summary Judgment When Law Compels Result – when discovery reveals that one party will prevail, regardless of disputed issues of non-material facts
42
Q

Pre-Trial Conference

A

can only modify a final pre-trial order only by showing manifest injustice

43
Q

Burden of Proof

A
  1. More Likely Than Not – preponderance of the evidence required proof standard
    2. Special Situations – libel, slander, fraud require clear, cogent, and convincing
44
Q

Procedure

A
  1. Evidence Motion – motion in limine to determine admission
    2. Opening Statement – limited to facts to be presented
    3. Timeliness of Trial Objections – earliest practicable opportunity
    a. Rulings on Evidence – object before witness answers question
    b. Other Rulings – object during course of the trial “on the record”
    c. Constitutional Exception – constitutional questions can be raised any time, even on appeal
    4. Mistrials – unwarranted statements by counsel; abuse of cell phone use by jurors
    a. Motion – made during trial itself; if granted, trial is void; motion for new trial made at conclusion of trial
    b. Timeliness – made as soon as practicable after the misconduct occurs
45
Q

Jury Trials

A

FRCP 38; 7thA in federal courts

	1. Of Right – any party may demand affirmatively; if don’t demand, waiver
	2. Legal or Equitable Decisions – decide questions of fact; judges decide questions of law, equity
	3. Docket Designation – upon receiving jury demand, FRCP 39 requires trial to be placed on docket
46
Q

Jury Selection

A

6 to 12 members; voir dire process of selecting jurors; judges, attorneys as Qs

		a. Peremptory Challenge – don’t need to give reason; each party gets 3 in civil case
		b. Restriction – constitutional; can’t eliminate on basis of race, gender
		c. Challenge For Cause – LIB – no limit
			(1) Lack of Qualifications – <18, not USC, no English, convicted felon
			(2) Incapacity – unsound mind or body; minor
			(3) Bias, Actual or Implied – usual basis for challenge; where juror employed by/related to party in the case
47
Q

Jury Instructions

A

a. Generally – formal instructions given to jury by judge before deliberations; provided in writing; cover role of jury, BOP, elements of COAs, defenses, special instructions for case
b. Content of Instructions – accurately reflect applicable law; neutral, not argumentative
c. Timing and Procedure – submitted at trial after all evidence presented; each side can submit; usually governed by local rules; can also use pattern jury instructions – FRCP 51
d. Objections to Proposed Instructions – aka “exceptions”
(1) Timeliness – at earliest opportunity; otherwise waiver
(2) Preserve for Appeal – made and entered timely at trial; “on the record” if in chambers

48
Q

Counsel’s Closing Argument

A

party w/burden opens and closes, only on evidence presented

49
Q

Jury Deliberations

A

held in private; no one else can be in room; can’t do legal research; can’t discuss w/anyone else; only consider evidence in court

50
Q

Verdict

A

unanimous unless otherwise stipulated; in absence of verdict, a mistrial; polling after

51
Q

Jury Misconduct, Setting Aside the Verdict

A

a. Improper Actions – depends on severity of conduct and prejudice to losing party
b. Improper Reasoning or Thought Process – not enough; nor juror’s motives, intentions
c. Life Experiences – not enough; sharing w/other jurors
d. Bias or Prejudice – not enough, unless deliberately concealed during VD and expressed during deliberations or outside courtroom
e. Error in Recording or Reporting Verdict – clerical error can be enough to set aside
f. Procedure – brought as motion for new trial under FRCP 59

52
Q

JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

A

FRCP 50
A. Terminology – used to be call judgment notwithstanding the verdict, for a directed verdict
B. Purpose and Timing
1. Purpose – keep case from being decided by jury when no rational factual basis; where one party has failed to produce material evidence
2. Timing – after either party rests their case, or submission to jury; can only move (renew) for JMOL after jury has rendered verdict if made during proceedings; court can enter sua sponte
3. Comparison to Summary Judgment – essentially delayed motion for SJ
C. Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence
1. Generally – whether evidence is sufficient to submit the case to the jury; no evidence or reasonable inference therefrom to sustain a verdict against non-moving party
2. Burden on Motion – on moving party; motion admits truth of evidence offered by opposing party and all reasonable inferences therefrom; evidence interpreted in favor of non-moving party
3. Credibility Disregarded – on bar exam but not in practice
4. No Weighing of Evidence – by court

53
Q

VERDICTS AND JUDGMENTS (OTHER THAN JML)

A

A. Jury Trials – may ask jury to render general verdict in favor of one party or special verdict of answers to questions of fact; jury can also answer interrogatories
B. Bench (Judge) Trials – FRCP 52 – judge makes findings of facts and conclusions of law
C. Entry of Judgment – FRCP 58 – date “entered” starts time running for post-trial motions; occurs when judgment reduced to writing, signed by judge, delivered to clerk for filing
D. Costs and Attorney Fees
1. Litigation Costs – prevailing party usually entitled to recover; specified by statute
2. Attorney Fees – American rule (default): each side pays own fees, unless otherwise provided by statute or K

54
Q

POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

A

A. Motion for a New Trial – FRCP 59
1. Grounds – JET – irregularity in the proceedings, misconduct by persons involved in trial
a. Juror Misconduct
b. Errors of Law – same kind of error that can be raised on appeal
c. Timeliness – principle of timely objection applies; must object during trial and as soon as practicable after the event occurs
2. Timing and Procedure – no later than 28 days after entry of judgment
B. Motion to Vacate Judgment – FRCP 60
1. Grounds – clerical errors, excusable neglect, fraud, lack of jdx, newly discovered evidence not discoverable w/out diligence
2. Timing and Procedure – must be brought w/in reasonable time; at court’s discretion
C. Harmless Error – FRCP 61 – minor errors during trial don’t require reversal of judgment by appellate court; errors not affecting a party’s substantial rights usually disregarded

55
Q

When an Appeal is Allowed

A

Final Judgment Rule
1. Appeal as of Right – from final judgment or any other decision that terminates action
2. Collateral Order Doctrine – court has discretion to construe finality practically rather than technically; allow immediate review of interlocutory decisions of substantial importance to outcome of case
3. Discretionary Review – sometimes obtain interlocutory review of a decision that is not final if
obtain permission of district court and court of appeals; 28 USC 1292(b)
4. Extraordinary Writs – get review of district court action before primary judgment of DC
a. Writ of Mandamus – DC has gone rogue; when no other form of review is available to remedy error effectively and justice requires the writ to issue
b. Writ of Prohibition – orders DC to refrain from taking action that is contrary to law

56
Q

Appeal Procedure

A

FRAPs control

	1. Time for Notice of Appeal – FRAP 4 - jurisdictional; 30 days to file after entry of judgment to file w/DC; 60 days if govt is party; post-trial motions change deadline, 30 days post to file
	2. Extension – must show extraordinary circumstances; strong interest in finality prevails
	3. Standard of Review
		a. Pure Questions of Law – de novo review; no deference to DC
		b. Discretionary Rulings – abuse of discretion; rule is to defer to DC
		c. Factual Determinations – clear error; reversals of factual issues is rare
		d. Raised Below – unless jurisdiction or constitutional questions
		e. Sustain on Any Theory – any grounds w/in record
	4. Circuit Court of Appeals – appeal as of right, reviews DC decisions
	5. United States Supreme Court – review of court of appeals usually discretionary
		a. Conflict – circuit split or conflict w/SCOTUS decision
		b. Question of Law – must be significant
		c. Substantial Public Interest – requiring SCOTUS’s determination
57
Q

PRECLUSION

A

to achieve judicial economy, litigants should only in theory have one opportunity to try their case
A. Res Judicata – judgment is binding and conclusive between the same parties and any people in privity with those parties in a second lawsuit; no second bite at the apple allowed
1. Same Facts – same T/O can’t serve as basis for second lawsuit; claim-splitting not allowed by P; includes compulsory counterclaims by D
2. Claim Preclusion – claim is merged into the judgment; can’t sue again for more $ on same injury
3. Non party – new P is not usually bound by prior judgment even if they were relative of previous P
B. Collateral Estoppel – prevents relitigation of specific issues of fact or law between the parties that were necessary to the outcome of the first lawsuit
1. Same Issue – issue that was actually or necessarily decided in reaching final litigated judgment is not subject to relitigation between the same parties; non-parties not barred unless substantial legal relationship (e.g., successive property owners)
2. Issue Preclusion – e.g., once party is deemed unable to assert immunity, can’t raise in another case on the same matter
3. Offensive – Defensive Use – courts reluctant to allow offensive where D held previously liable; more inclined towards defensive use of non-mutual collateral estoppel where D previously exculpated; depends on how vigorously D litigated core liability issue in case #1