Civ Pro Flashcards
Diversity Jurisdiction
- 28 USC Sec. 1332
-The district court shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and is between (1) citizens of different states
(2) citizens of a state and citizens of a foreign state
Proper venue
Venue is proper in a judicial district in which
(1) any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state in which the district is located
(2) a substantial part of the events or omission on which the claim is based occurred
(3) a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is located
Federal question jurisdiction
- 28 USC Sec. 1331
-The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States
Supplemental Jurisidiction
- Governed by 28 USC Sec. 1367
- When a federal court has original jurisdiction over one claim in a civil action, it may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to that claim that they form part of the same case or controversy
Same case or controversy
Requires that the supplemental claim must arise from the common nucleus of operative fact as the freestanding claim
Subject-matter jurisdiction
Courts must have subject-matter jurisdiction over every claim in the case either through original or supplemental jurisdiction
Sec. 1367(c) factors that suggest that the court should decline jurisdiction
- Novel or complex issue of state law
- State law claim predominates
- Federal question claim dismissed
-Other reason
Erie doctrine re: federal courts in diversity cases
Federal courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law and federal procedural law
Pleadings (kinds, what makes it adequate, applicability)
- Governed by Rule 8
- A pleading is adequate if it contains a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief
- Generally applies to any claim brought in federal court
Bulge Provision (applicability)
Only applicable to…
- 3rd party defendant who is joined under Rule 14
- Required party who is joined under Rule 19
What does the bulge provision do?
A federal court has personal jurisdiction over a party who is served within a U.S. judicial district and not more than 100 miles from where the summons is issued, even if state law would otherwise not permit such service
Motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) (what is required for the nonmoving party to overcome the motion)
The complaint must state enough facts to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of the necessary element
Timing jury trial demand
Jury trial demand must be served within 14 days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue that is sought to be tried by a jury
Timing of motion for relief from a judgment that is based on newly discovered evidence
Must be filed within a reasonable time and no later than one year from the entry of the judgment
Federal inadvertent-waiver rule
Disclosure of such communications or information does not waive the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection if…
- disclosure was made in federal proceeding or to federal agency
- disclosure was inadvertent
- privilege holder took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure and
- privilege holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error
Timing of challenge to personal jurisdiction
- May be made in original answer
OR - in an amended answer made without the court’s permission within 21 days after the original answer was served
Compulsory joinder (FRCP 19)
Provided SMJ is preserved, a person must be joined in a lawsuit if their absence will
- prevent court from granting complete relief to existing parties
OR
- prejudice absent person’s interest
OR
- subject existing party to multiple or inconsistent obligations
Permissive joinder (FRCP 20)
Person may be joined in a lawsuit if…
- claims by or against person arise out of the same transaction or occurrence
AND
-common questions of fact OR law will arise
Aggregation of claims involving one P and one D
- Aggregation allowed and claim amounts will be added together
Aggregation of claims involving one P and multiple D’s
- Aggregation not allowed unless Ds are jointly liable
- AICs kept separate
Aggregation of claims involving multiple Ps and one D
- Aggregation not allowed unless Ps enforcing common or undivided interest (AICs kept separate)
FRCP 18
Allows a party to join as many claims as it has against an opposing party in a single lawsuit, even if the claims arise from different facts or occurrences