Civ Pro Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when is claim compulsory

A

same transaction or occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how do you get personal jdx

A

General: resident ∆ or served in state

Specific: minimum contacts and evidence of purposeful availment. Must satisfy traditional notions of FairPlay and substantial justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do you get subject matter jdx

A

federal question

diversity

supplemental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when can you not do supplemental even if you have the same common nucleus of operative fact

A

diversity: destroys diversity

federal question: state claim substantially predominates or federal claims all dismissed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

where can ∆ remove to

A

anywhere that π could have filed originally

but can’t remove if ∆ already has home state advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

where is venue proper

A

I. all ∆s live in same state: any district where a ∆ resides

ii. where substantial part of events occurred

iii. if none of the above, anywhere with jdx over one ∆

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what if venue was proper but there’s a better one

A

court can transfer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what if venue was improper

A

can transfer or dismiss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when does eerie occur

A

federal diversity or supplemental claim based on state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

rule for eerie

A

federal court must apply federal procedural and state substantive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

test for if it is substantive

A

is it outcome determinative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

some stuff that is always substantive

A

SOL, elements of claims or defenses, burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what conflict of law rules does federal court apply

A

the state it is in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

requirements for class action

A
  1. numerosity
  2. commonality
  3. typicality
  4. adequacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

diversity rules for class action

A
  1. regular case: one diverse class rep and over 75k
  2. class action fairness act: at least 100 members, 5million, and any π is diverse from any ∆
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how long do you have for service of process

A

90 days from complaint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

methods of service

A

To ∆,
∆’s place of abode if left with person of suitable age and discretion,
or ∆’s agent

To corporation ∆, office is ok

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how long does ∆ have to reply to complaint

A

21 days or 60 if waives service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what does TRO do

A

Preserves status quo until court can decide

Good for up to 14 days, then need consent or good cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

when can TRO be issued without notice to ∆

A
  • Immediate and irreparable injury will result
  • Movant’s attorney certifies that they tried to give notice
  • And gives reason why notice shouldn’t be required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

when is preliminary injunction issued

A
  • Π is likely to succeed on the merits
  • Π is likely to suffer irreparable harm without it
  • Balance of equities is in π’s favor
  • Injunction is in public interests
22
Q

test for motion to dismiss

A

1) reject all legal conclusions, 2) treat all well pleaded facts as true and see if there’s a viable case

23
Q

test for motion for judgment on pleadings

A

if nothing is in dispute

24
Q

when can you amend

A

once as of right within 21 days but court should freely give leave

25
Q

rule for relating back for a claim

A

relates back to date of original if amendment asserts claim or defense that arose out of same transaction or occurrence

26
Q

rule for relating back for a new ∆

A

works if

  • New party receives notice within 90 days of original complaint being filed
  • ∆ knew or should’ve known about action but for mistake of identity
27
Q

what does attorney signing warrant for rule 11

A

 Not improper
 Warranted by law or nonfrivolous argument for law change
 Have or will have evidentiary support
 Denials are warranted or reasonably based on belief

28
Q

what is the safe harbor

A

have to give attorney 21 days to fix it before filing rule 11 sanctions

29
Q

how long do you have to appeal

A

within 30 days of judgment

30
Q

how long do you have to file renewed judgment as matter of law

A

within 28 days after judgement (must have already raised it once)

31
Q

what does interpleader do

A

Allows person holding property (stakeholder) to force all claimaints into one suit

32
Q

Federal interpleader rule

A

o Ps: persons with claims that may expose π to liability can be forced to come together in one suit though they lack common origin and are adverse and independent

o Ds: exposed to similar liability may seek interpleader through cross or counter claim

33
Q

what is impleader

A

Defending party can implead nonparty for liability on original claim

Can be asserted any time but need permission if more than 14 days after original answer

Must have original subject matter jdx OR supplemental jdx

34
Q

how many written interrogatories per party?

how many oral depositions per party?

A

25 written

10 oral

35
Q

when is summary judgement granted

A

No genuine dispute as to any material fact

Court will construe all facts in favor of nonmovant and decide

36
Q

standard of review for review of trial court’s factual findings

A

clearly erroneous

37
Q

standard of review for review of legal rulings

A

de novo

38
Q

standard of review for - review of discretionary rulings:

A

abuse of discretion

39
Q

elements of claim preclusion (res judicator)

A

o Valid final judgement on merits
o Same claim
o Same parties

40
Q

elements of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel)

A

o Same issue
o Actually litigated
o Valid final judgment
o Issue was essential to judgement

41
Q

final judgement rule

A

can only appeal after final judgements

few exceptions:
multiple claims, court says no reason to delay,
injunction,
certification,
bankruptcy

42
Q

what is a special verdict

A

Written finding made by jury on each issue of ultimate fact

Then judge determines legal consequence of those facts

43
Q

what is a general verdict

A

Normal kind

Jury decides who wins, and damages

44
Q

what is a general verdict with special interrogatories

A

Combines both special and general, ensures the jury evaluates each material fact

45
Q

what if the interrogatory answers are not consistent with general verdict

A

court can:
Approve a judgement consistent with the answers

Direct jury to reconsider

Order new trial

46
Q

a temporary restraining order must have

A

i. reasons why issued
ii. reasonable description of prohibited acts
iii. specific terms

47
Q

requirements for compulsory joinder of parties

A
  1. party must be necessary
  2. must be PJ over new party
  3. must be SMJ over new party (can’t destroy diversity)
48
Q

what if adding new party would destroy diversity (compulsory joinder)

A

party is indispensable: court has to dismiss
party not indispensable: go ahead without them

49
Q

what is a necessary party for joinder

A
  1. court can’t give full relief without that party
  2. party might be harmed by not joining
  3. risk of inconsistent judgement or double liability
50
Q

factors to determine if party is indispensable for joinder

A
  1. extent to which it would prejudice parties not to have them
  2. extent to which prejudice could be reduced or avoided by protective provisions
  3. whether judgement rendered would be adequate
  4. whether plaintiff would have adequate remedy if court dismissed for this