Civ Pro Flashcards
Unless a different time is set by court order or stipulation, within _____ days after the meeting the parties must provide names, addresses, the telephone number of individuals who have discoverable information that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses (unless needed solely for impeachment)
14
During discovery, electronically stored information doesn’t need to be produced if the responding party identifies it as
not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost
Generally, the work product made by a party or representative of a party (like party’s attorney) is NOT discoverable if it is made _____ unless the party requesting discovery can show substantial need and undue hardship if disclosure is not ordered
in anticipation of litigation
the opinion of an expert consulted in anticipation of litigation is discoverable IF a party ____
BUT if this expert is NOT expected to testify at trial (like a consulting witness) then it is discoverable ONLY upon a showing of exceptional circumstances under which it is impractible to obtain facts or opinions by other means
intends to call the expert as a TRIAL WITNESS
Generally, a party may obtain discovery regarding any matter that is ______ and that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense, provided that the matter is not subject to a privilege or exception for trial preparation materials, also called work product
proportional to the needs of the case
In a situation where desired information may be ascertained from the business records of the party on whom the interrogatory was served, and where the burden of finding the information is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to provide ___
the serving party with reasonable opportunity to examine the records
PJ the big question is does the defendant have ________so that the exercise of personal jurisdiction is fair and reasonable?
sufficient contacts with the forum state
two step analysis for PJ:
(1) Exercise of PJ must first fall within a ___
(2) the exercise of PJ must satisfy ______
(1) state statute
(2) the Constitution (DP)
the PJ analysis is the same for state and ______
federal court
Each state has a “long arm” statute granting PJ over _____ who perform or cause certain things within the state
nonresidents
If you see a MEE question that gives you a statute, just apply it. BUT if you do not have a statute in the question, just note that ___
you need a state statute and you’re going to assume the statutory requirement has been satisfied
then move on to the constituonal analysis
Constitutional analysis we ask - does the D have such _______ so jdx does not offend ___
3 factors:
FRC
minimum contacts with the forum
traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?
(1) contact
(2) relatedness
(3) fairness
PJ:
Contact means there must be relevant ____ b/w the defendant and the forum state
The two factors to be addressed here are
minimum contacts
(1) purposeful availment and
(2) foreseeability
purposeful availment means the D must _____ and the contact must result from this targeting of the forum
reach out to the forum
Can the D purposefully avail w/o setting foot in forum?
yes by causing an effect in the forum
PJ:
Forseeability means after finding that the D arguably availed herself of the forum, we must ask - is it foreseeable that
D could be sued in that forum?
Relatedness means that once we have concluded there is arguable a relevant contact, we move to relatedness.
We ask - does Plaintiff’s claim arise from or relate to D’s ____?
If yes, then the case involves_____. If no, the only way to proceed is if the court has “general PJ”
contacts with the forum?
Specific PJ
If the “relatedness” test is satisfied, then the case will be assessed for ___ and we jump to step C and assess whether the exercise of jdx would be fair or reasonable
specific PJ
if the “relatedness” test is NOT satisfied (meaning that P’s claim does NOT arise out of or relate to D’s contacts) then the only way to proceed is with ____
IF _____ exists, then D can be sued in the forum on a claim that arise anywhere in the world.
To have ____, the D must be _____ in the forum
Where is a human always _____? A human is _____ where she is domiciled.
general PJ
at home
Venue is considered to be waived unless a timely obejction (in a _______) is made to the improper venue
pre-pleading motion or, when no such motion is made, in the answer
Unlike jurisdiction over subject matter (cannot be waived), venue may
be waived by the parties
For venue purposes, a business entity defendant is deemed to RESIDE in
ANY judicial districtt in which the D is subejct to the court’s PJ with respect to the ACTION IN QUESTION
Can parties agree to which venue they want?
yes
Can parties agree to what SMJ they want?
NO
SMJ cannot be conferred by
agreement
SMJ is the power of the court to adjudicate the matter before it, whereas venue relates to the
proper geographic district to which to bring the action
When a transfer is based on the ground that the venue was IMPROPER – the LAW that applies in the transferee court is the law of
the transferee court
A transfer on convenience grounds means that the law of the ______ court will continue to apply
transferor
to be “at home” in a state, a defendant corporation must be ______ in the state or have its _____
incorporated
PBP
For specific jurisdiction, it must be determined whether the state has a ____authorizing jdx and whether the statute is _____
long arm statute
constitutional
PUrsuant to Rule 12(b), improper venue must be raised in a defendant’s FIRST RESPONSE - either in its timely MTD before the _____, OR in the ____, whatever is first
answer
no strict time limit
Trick #1: The plaintiff can’t fucking remove the case.
The defendant removes. NOT the plaintiff.
Trick #2: The defendant can’t fucking remove to their own home state in a diversity action.
They just can’t.
But here’s the actual trick… in a _____… the defendant CAN remove to the same state they are from.
Federal Question action
FEDERAL QUESTION CASE = DEFENDANT CAN REMOVE TO THE SAME STATE THEY’RE FROM
DIVERSITY CASE = DEFENDANT ___ REMOVE TO THE SAME STATE THEY’RE FROM
cannot
Defendant has 30 days to remove or 30 days from WHEN
THAT SHIT BECOMES REMOVABLE
Trick #3: Cases Have to “___” Under Federal Law to Get That Federal Question Status
arise
____ service means you are not making the other side formally serve your dumbass a complaint and summons to court.
waiving
why would you want to waive service?
Normally you get 21 days to respond to a complaint with an answer, but if you waive service you get 60 days!
If you are a foreign defendant you get 90 days to respond to the answer instead of 21.
But here’s the actual trick they like: Let’s say you request someone waives service, and they don’t respond. You still have to
fucking serve them.
Trick #5: _____: The Buzz-Word That Changed the World
Anytime the judge has a CHOICE on what to do… and makes a little judgment call based on his understanding of the law and facts… it will be reviewed by the appellate courts using the _____ standard
ABUSE OF DISCRETION
Anyway… how will we know the question is “hinting” at abuse of discretion?
PERMITTED
“the judge/corut PERMITED”
Trick #6: Default Judgment: What happens when someone doesn’t show up. I’m keeping this simple.
The main fucking thing we need to know is who can actually enter the default judgment if no one shows up: we have two options
- ____
2._______
- Daddy Judge
- Baby boy Clerk
Scenario #1: Nobody shows up and doesn’t file a single goddamn thing. ____ enters judgment.
If they never show up, ___ required.
baby clerk
no notice
Scenario #2: Somebody shows up once then stops showing up: _____ must enter the default after a hearing.
daddy judge
IF DEFENDANT NEVER SHOWS UP + SUM CERTAIN = ___ ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT
clerk
IF THEY SHOW UP ONCE = OTHER PARTY MUST SERVE THEM ______ OF DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST ___ DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING!!
notice
7
TRIED TO THE COURT = ____ = ONLY JUDGE AND NO JURY
bench trial
The trick on the MBE is that the judge will get a little cocky. At the end of the trial he will just say some brief shit like “Judgment is entered for Goat. See y’all later.”
is thsi allowed?
NO because he needs to talk about the FINDINGS of fact and state the CONCLUSIONS of law separately
You can voluntarily dismiss a case ONCE
But then a SECOND voluntary dismissal operates as an ______ = your shitty pro se lawsuit is. now dismissed _______
adjudication on the mereits