CIPM Flashcards
What is the best way to understand the location, use and importance of personal data within an organization?
A. By analyzing the data inventory.
B. By testing the security of data systems.
C. By evaluating methods for collecting data.
D. By interviewing employees tasked with data entry.
By analyzing the data inventory.
Analyzing the data inventory involves creating a comprehensive record of all the personal data that the organization collects, processes, and stores. This includes information about where the data is located, how it is used, who has access to it, and why it is important for the organization’s operations. By conducting a thorough data inventory, the organization can gain insights into the scope of its data holdings, identify potential risks and compliance issues, and develop effective data management and protection strategies.
What are you doing if you succumb to “overgeneralization” when analyzing data from metrics?
A. Using data that is too broad to capture specific meanings.
B. Possessing too many types of data to perform a valid analysis.
C. Using limited data in an attempt to support broad conclusions.
D. Trying to use several measurements to gauge one aspect of a program.
Using limited data
Overgeneralization in data analysis occurs when conclusions or insights are drawn from a dataset that are too broad or universal, based on a limited sample or specific conditions.
In addition to regulatory requirements and business practices, what important factors must a global privacy strategy consider?
A. Monetary exchange.
B. Geographic features.
C. Political history.
D. Cultural norms.
Cultural norms
The CIPM highlights the importance of understanding the context you are working in, i.e. not seeing data protection as a standalone issue, but something which responds to the context of the organisation you are working for. So issues like the wider organisational context, type of business, cultural norms, risk appetite of your organisation, and so on, are all factors in ensuring that the privacy program is positioned to respond to those needs as well as the more privacy/data protection specific legal and regulatory requirements.
What have experts identified as an important trend in privacy program development?
A. The narrowing of regulatory definitions of personal information.
B. The rollback of ambitious programs due to budgetary restraints.
C. The movement beyond crisis management to proactive prevention.
D. The stabilization of programs as the pace of new legal mandates slows.
The movement beyond crisis management to proactive prevention.
SCENARIO -
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Manasa is a product manager at Omnipresent Omnimedia, where she is responsible for leading the development of the company’s flagship product, the Handy Helper. The Handy Helper is an application that can be used in the home to manage family calendars, do online shopping, and schedule doctor appointments. After having had a successful launch in the United States, the Handy Helper is about to be made available for purchase worldwide.
The packaging and user guide for the Handy Helper indicate that it is a “privacy friendly” product suitable for the whole family, including children, but does not provide any further detail or privacy notice. In order to use the application, a family creates a single account, and the primary user has access to all information about the other users. Upon start up, the primary user must check a box consenting to receive marketing emails from Omnipresent Omnimedia and selected marketing partners in order to be able to use the application.
Sanjay, the head of privacy at Omnipresent Omnimedia, was working on an agreement with a European distributor of Handy Helper when he fielded many questions about the product from the distributor. Sanjay needed to look more closely at the product in order to be able to answer the questions as he was not involved in the product development process.
In speaking with the product team, he learned that the Handy Helper collected and stored all of a user’s sensitive medical information for the medical appointment scheduler. In fact, all of the user’s information is stored by Handy Helper for the additional purpose of creating additional products and to analyze usage of the product. This data is all stored in the cloud and is encrypted both during transmission and at rest.
Consistent with the CEO’s philosophy that great new product ideas can come from anyone, all Omnipresent Omnimedia employees have access to user data under a program called Eureka. Omnipresent Omnimedia is hoping that at some point in the future, the data will reveal insights that could be used to create a fully automated application that runs on artificial intelligence, but as of yet, Eureka is not well-defined and is considered a long-term goal.
What step in the system development process did Manasa skip?
A. Obtain express written consent from users of the Handy Helper regarding marketing.
B. Work with Sanjay to review any necessary privacy requirements to be built into the product.
C. Certify that the Handy Helper meets the requirements of the EU-US Privacy Shield Framework.
D. Build the artificial intelligence feature so that users would not have to input sensitive information into the Handy Helper.
Work with Sanjay to review any necessary privacy requirements to be built into the product.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Manasa is a product manager at Omnipresent Omnimedia, where she is responsible for leading the development of the company’s flagship product, the Handy Helper. The Handy Helper is an application that can be used in the home to manage family calendars, do online shopping, and schedule doctor appointments. After having had a successful launch in the United States, the Handy Helper is about to be made available for purchase worldwide.
The packaging and user guide for the Handy Helper indicate that it is a “privacy friendly” product suitable for the whole family, including children, but does not provide any further detail or privacy notice. In order to use the application, a family creates a single account, and the primary user has access to all information about the other users. Upon start up, the primary user must check a box consenting to receive marketing emails from Omnipresent Omnimedia and selected marketing partners in order to be able to use the application.
Sanjay, the head of privacy at Omnipresent Omnimedia, was working on an agreement with a European distributor of Handy Helper when he fielded many questions about the product from the distributor. Sanjay needed to look more closely at the product in order to be able to answer the questions as he was not involved in the product development process.
In speaking with the product team, he learned that the Handy Helper collected and stored all of a user’s sensitive medical information for the medical appointment scheduler. In fact, all of the user’s information is stored by Handy Helper for the additional purpose of creating additional products and to analyze usage of the product. This data is all stored in the cloud and is encrypted both during transmission and at rest.
Consistent with the CEO’s philosophy that great new product ideas can come from anyone, all Omnipresent Omnimedia employees have access to user data under a program called Eureka. Omnipresent Omnimedia is hoping that at some point in the future, the data will reveal insights that could be used to create a fully automated application that runs on artificial intelligence, but as of yet, Eureka is not well-defined and is considered a long-term goal.
What administrative safeguards should be implemented to protect the collected data while in use by Manasa and her product management team?
A. Document the data flows for the collected data.
B. Conduct a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) to evaluate the risks involved.
C. Implement a policy restricting data access on a “need to know” basis.
D. Limit data transfers to the US by keeping data collected in Europe within a local data center.
Implement a policy restricting data access on a “need to know” basis.
Manasa is a product manager at Omnipresent Omnimedia, where she is responsible for leading the development of the company’s flagship product, the Handy Helper. The Handy Helper is an application that can be used in the home to manage family calendars, do online shopping, and schedule doctor appointments. After having had a successful launch in the United States, the Handy Helper is about to be made available for purchase worldwide.
The packaging and user guide for the Handy Helper indicate that it is a “privacy friendly” product suitable for the whole family, including children, but does not provide any further detail or privacy notice. In order to use the application, a family creates a single account, and the primary user has access to all information about the other users. Upon start up, the primary user must check a box consenting to receive marketing emails from Omnipresent Omnimedia and selected marketing partners in order to be able to use the application.
Sanjay, the head of privacy at Omnipresent Omnimedia, was working on an agreement with a European distributor of Handy Helper when he fielded many questions about the product from the distributor. Sanjay needed to look more closely at the product in order to be able to answer the questions as he was not involved in the product development process.
In speaking with the product team, he learned that the Handy Helper collected and stored all of a user’s sensitive medical information for the medical appointment scheduler. In fact, all of the user’s information is stored by Handy Helper for the additional purpose of creating additional products and to analyze usage of the product. This data is all stored in the cloud and is encrypted both during transmission and at rest.
Consistent with the CEO’s philosophy that great new product ideas can come from anyone, all Omnipresent Omnimedia employees have access to user data under a program called Eureka. Omnipresent Omnimedia is hoping that at some point in the future, the data will reveal insights that could be used to create a fully automated application that runs on artificial intelligence, but as of yet, Eureka is not well-defined and is considered a long-term goal.
What element of the Privacy by Design (PbD) framework might the Handy Helper violate?
A. Failure to obtain opt-in consent to marketing.
B. Failure to observe data localization requirements.
C. Failure to implement the least privilege access standard.
D. Failure to integrate privacy throughout the system development life cycle.
Failure to integrate privacy throughout the system development life cycle.
PbD is about integrating privacy requirements at the design phase of new systems, processes and projects undertaken.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Manasa is a product manager at Omnipresent Omnimedia, where she is responsible for leading the development of the company’s flagship product, the Handy Helper. The Handy Helper is an application that can be used in the home to manage family calendars, do online shopping, and schedule doctor appointments. After having had a successful launch in the United States, the Handy Helper is about to be made available for purchase worldwide.
The packaging and user guide for the Handy Helper indicate that it is a “privacy friendly” product suitable for the whole family, including children, but does not provide any further detail or privacy notice. In order to use the application, a family creates a single account, and the primary user has access to all information about the other users. Upon start up, the primary user must check a box consenting to receive marketing emails from Omnipresent Omnimedia and selected marketing partners in order to be able to use the application.
Sanjay, the head of privacy at Omnipresent Omnimedia, was working on an agreement with a European distributor of Handy Helper when he fielded many questions about the product from the distributor. Sanjay needed to look more closely at the product in order to be able to answer the questions as he was not involved in the product development process.
In speaking with the product team, he learned that the Handy Helper collected and stored all of a user’s sensitive medical information for the medical appointment scheduler. In fact, all of the user’s information is stored by Handy Helper for the additional purpose of creating additional products and to analyze usage of the product. This data is all stored in the cloud and is encrypted both during transmission and at rest.
Consistent with the CEO’s philosophy that great new product ideas can come from anyone, all Omnipresent Omnimedia employees have access to user data under a program called Eureka. Omnipresent Omnimedia is hoping that at some point in the future, the data will reveal insights that could be used to create a fully automated application that runs on artificial intelligence, but as of yet, Eureka is not well-defined and is considered a long-term goal.
What can Sanjay do to minimize the risks of offering the product in Europe?
A. Sanjay should advise the distributor that Omnipresent Omnimedia has certified to the Privacy Shield Framework and there should be no issues.
B. Sanjay should work with Manasa to review and remediate the Handy Helper as a gating item before it is released.
C. Sanjay should document the data life cycle of the data collected by the Handy Helper.
D. Sanjay should write a privacy policy to include with the Handy Helper user guide.
Sanjay should work with Manasa to review and remediate the Handy Helper as a gating item before it is released.
First assess the gap to understand whether the app is fit to release in EU considering the privacy norms in that region.
Which statement is FALSE regarding the use of technical security controls?
A. Technical security controls are part of a data governance strategy.
B. Technical security controls deployed for one jurisdiction often satisfy another jurisdiction.
C. Most privacy legislation lists the types of technical security controls that must be implemented.
D. A person with security knowledge should be involved with the deployment of technical security controls.
Most privacy legislation lists the types of technical security controls that must be implemented.
The choice of specific technical security controls is left to the organizations themselves, considering their unique circumstances and the nature of the data they handle.
An organization’s privacy officer was just notified by the benefits manager that she accidentally sent out the retirement enrollment report of all employees to a wrong vendor.
Which of the following actions should the privacy officer take first?
A. Perform a risk of harm analysis.
B. Report the incident to law enforcement.
C. Contact the recipient to delete the email.
D. Send firm-wide email notification to employees.
A. Perform a risk of harm analysis.
Henry Home Furnishings has built high-end furniture for nearly forty years. However, the new owner, Anton, has found some degree of disorganization after touring the company headquarters. His uncle Henry had always focused on production – not data processing – and Anton is concerned. In several storage rooms, he has found paper files, disks, and old computers that appear to contain the personal data of current and former employees and customers. Anton knows that a single break-in could irrevocably damage the company’s relationship with its loyal customers. He intends to set a goal of guaranteed zero loss of personal information.
To this end, Anton originally planned to place restrictions on who was admitted to the physical premises of the company. However, Kenneth – his uncle’s vice president and longtime confidante – wants to hold off on Anton’s idea in favor of converting any paper records held at the company to electronic storage. Kenneth believes this process would only take one or two years. Anton likes this idea; he envisions a password-protected system that only he and Kenneth can access.
Anton also plans to divest the company of most of its subsidiaries. Not only will this make his job easier, but it will simplify the management of the stored data. The heads of subsidiaries like the art gallery and kitchenware store down the street will be responsible for their own information management. Then, any unneeded subsidiary data still in Anton’s possession can be destroyed within the next few years.
After learning of a recent security incident, Anton realizes that another crucial step will be notifying customers. Kenneth insists that two lost hard drives in question are not cause for concern; all of the data was encrypted and not sensitive in nature. Anton does not want to take any chances, however. He intends on sending notice letters to all employees and customers to be safe.
Anton must also check for compliance with all legislative, regulatory, and market requirements related to privacy protection. Kenneth oversaw the development of the company’s online presence about ten years ago, but Anton is not confident about his understanding of recent online marketing laws. Anton is assigning another trusted employee with a law background the task of the compliance assessment. After a thorough analysis, Anton knows the company should be safe for another five years, at which time he can order another check. Documentation of this analysis will show auditors due diligence.
Anton has started down a long road toward improved management of the company, but he knows the effort is worth it. Anton wants his uncle’s legacy to continue for many years to come.
To improve the facility’s system of data security, Anton should consider following through with the plan for which of the following?
A. Customer communication.
B. Employee access to electronic storage.
C. Employee advisement regarding legal matters.
D. Controlled access at the company headquarters.
Controlled access at the company headquarters
Henry Home Furnishings has built high-end furniture for nearly forty years. However, the new owner, Anton, has found some degree of disorganization after touring the company headquarters. His uncle Henry had always focused on production – not data processing – and Anton is concerned. In several storage rooms, he has found paper files, disks, and old computers that appear to contain the personal data of current and former employees and customers. Anton knows that a single break-in could irrevocably damage the company’s relationship with its loyal customers. He intends to set a goal of guaranteed zero loss of personal information.
To this end, Anton originally planned to place restrictions on who was admitted to the physical premises of the company. However, Kenneth – his uncle’s vice president and longtime confidante – wants to hold off on Anton’s idea in favor of converting any paper records held at the company to electronic storage. Kenneth believes this process would only take one or two years. Anton likes this idea; he envisions a password-protected system that only he and Kenneth can access.
Anton also plans to divest the company of most of its subsidiaries. Not only will this make his job easier, but it will simplify the management of the stored data. The heads of subsidiaries like the art gallery and kitchenware store down the street will be responsible for their own information management. Then, any unneeded subsidiary data still in Anton’s possession can be destroyed within the next few years.
After learning of a recent security incident, Anton realizes that another crucial step will be notifying customers. Kenneth insists that two lost hard drives in question are not cause for concern; all of the data was encrypted and not sensitive in nature. Anton does not want to take any chances, however. He intends on sending notice letters to all employees and customers to be safe.
Anton must also check for compliance with all legislative, regulatory, and market requirements related to privacy protection. Kenneth oversaw the development of the company’s online presence about ten years ago, but Anton is not confident about his understanding of recent online marketing laws. Anton is assigning another trusted employee with a law background the task of the compliance assessment. After a thorough analysis, Anton knows the company should be safe for another five years, at which time he can order another check. Documentation of this analysis will show auditors due diligence.
Anton has started down a long road toward improved management of the company, but he knows the effort is worth it. Anton wants his uncle’s legacy to continue for many years to come.
Which of Anton’s plans for improving the data management of the company is most unachievable?
A. His initiative to achieve regulatory compliance.
B. His intention to transition to electronic storage.
C. His objective for zero loss of personal information.
D. His intention to send notice letters to customers and employees.
His objective for zero loss of personal information
Henry Home Furnishings has built high-end furniture for nearly forty years. However, the new owner, Anton, has found some degree of disorganization after touring the company headquarters. His uncle Henry had always focused on production – not data processing – and Anton is concerned. In several storage rooms, he has found paper files, disks, and old computers that appear to contain the personal data of current and former employees and customers. Anton knows that a single break-in could irrevocably damage the company’s relationship with its loyal customers. He intends to set a goal of guaranteed zero loss of personal information.
To this end, Anton originally planned to place restrictions on who was admitted to the physical premises of the company. However, Kenneth – his uncle’s vice president and longtime confidante – wants to hold off on Anton’s idea in favor of converting any paper records held at the company to electronic storage. Kenneth believes this process would only take one or two years. Anton likes this idea; he envisions a password-protected system that only he and Kenneth can access.
Anton also plans to divest the company of most of its subsidiaries. Not only will this make his job easier, but it will simplify the management of the stored data. The heads of subsidiaries like the art gallery and kitchenware store down the street will be responsible for their own information management. Then, any unneeded subsidiary data still in Anton’s possession can be destroyed within the next few years.
After learning of a recent security incident, Anton realizes that another crucial step will be notifying customers. Kenneth insists that two lost hard drives in question are not cause for concern; all of the data was encrypted and not sensitive in nature. Anton does not want to take any chances, however. He intends on sending notice letters to all employees and customers to be safe.
Anton must also check for compliance with all legislative, regulatory, and market requirements related to privacy protection. Kenneth oversaw the development of the company’s online presence about ten years ago, but Anton is not confident about his understanding of recent online marketing laws. Anton is assigning another trusted employee with a law background the task of the compliance assessment. After a thorough analysis, Anton knows the company should be safe for another five years, at which time he can order another check. Documentation of this analysis will show auditors due diligence.
Anton has started down a long road toward improved management of the company, but he knows the effort is worth it. Anton wants his uncle’s legacy to continue for many years to come.
Which important principle of Data Lifecycle Management (DLM) will most likely be compromised if Anton executes his plan to limit data access to himself and Kenneth?
A. Practicing data minimalism.
B. Ensuring data retrievability.
C. Implementing clear policies.
D. Ensuring adequacy of infrastructure.
Ensuring data retrievability
Data retrievability refers to the ability to access and use data when needed for business purposes or legal obligations1 It involves maintaining the availability, integrity, and usability of data throughout its lifecycle2 However, if Anton restricts data access to only himself and Kenneth, he will create a single point of failure and a bottleneck for data retrieval. This could pose several risks and challenges for the company, such as: Losing data if Anton or Kenneth forgets the password or leaves the company without sharing it with others. Delaying data retrieval if Anton or Kenneth is unavailable or unresponsive when someone else needs the data urgently. Violating data protection laws or regulations that require data access by certain parties or authorities under certain circumstances. Reducing data quality or accuracy if Anton or Kenneth fails to update or maintain the data properly. Missing business opportunities or insights if Anton or Kenneth does not share the data with other relevant stakeholders or department
Henry Home Furnishings has built high-end furniture for nearly forty years. However, the new owner, Anton, has found some degree of disorganization after touring the company headquarters. His uncle Henry had always focused on production – not data processing – and Anton is concerned. In several storage rooms, he has found paper files, disks, and old computers that appear to contain the personal data of current and former employees and customers. Anton knows that a single break-in could irrevocably damage the company’s relationship with its loyal customers. He intends to set a goal of guaranteed zero loss of personal information.
To this end, Anton originally planned to place restrictions on who was admitted to the physical premises of the company. However, Kenneth – his uncle’s vice president and longtime confidante – wants to hold off on Anton’s idea in favor of converting any paper records held at the company to electronic storage. Kenneth believes this process would only take one or two years. Anton likes this idea; he envisions a password-protected system that only he and Kenneth can access.
Anton also plans to divest the company of most of its subsidiaries. Not only will this make his job easier, but it will simplify the management of the stored data. The heads of subsidiaries like the art gallery and kitchenware store down the street will be responsible for their own information management. Then, any unneeded subsidiary data still in Anton’s possession can be destroyed within the next few years.
After learning of a recent security incident, Anton realizes that another crucial step will be notifying customers. Kenneth insists that two lost hard drives in question are not cause for concern; all of the data was encrypted and not sensitive in nature. Anton does not want to take any chances, however. He intends on sending notice letters to all employees and customers to be safe.
Anton must also check for compliance with all legislative, regulatory, and market requirements related to privacy protection. Kenneth oversaw the development of the company’s online presence about ten years ago, but Anton is not confident about his understanding of recent online marketing laws. Anton is assigning another trusted employee with a law background the task of the compliance assessment. After a thorough analysis, Anton knows the company should be safe for another five years, at which time he can order another check. Documentation of this analysis will show auditors due diligence.
Anton has started down a long road toward improved management of the company, but he knows the effort is worth it. Anton wants his uncle’s legacy to continue for many years to come.
In terms of compliance with regulatory and legislative changes, Anton has a misconception regarding?
A. The timeline for monitoring.
B. The method of recordkeeping.
C. The use of internal employees.
D. The type of required qualifications.
Timeline for monitoring.
Regulatory and legislative changes can occur at any time, and it is crucial to monitor compliance on an ongoing basis to ensure that the company remains in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Henry Home Furnishings has built high-end furniture for nearly forty years. However, the new owner, Anton, has found some degree of disorganization after touring the company headquarters. His uncle Henry had always focused on production – not data processing – and Anton is concerned. In several storage rooms, he has found paper files, disks, and old computers that appear to contain the personal data of current and former employees and customers. Anton knows that a single break-in could irrevocably damage the company’s relationship with its loyal customers. He intends to set a goal of guaranteed zero loss of personal information.
To this end, Anton originally planned to place restrictions on who was admitted to the physical premises of the company. However, Kenneth – his uncle’s vice president and longtime confidante – wants to hold off on Anton’s idea in favor of converting any paper records held at the company to electronic storage. Kenneth believes this process would only take one or two years. Anton likes this idea; he envisions a password-protected system that only he and Kenneth can access.
Anton also plans to divest the company of most of its subsidiaries. Not only will this make his job easier, but it will simplify the management of the stored data. The heads of subsidiaries like the art gallery and kitchenware store down the street will be responsible for their own information management. Then, any unneeded subsidiary data still in Anton’s possession can be destroyed within the next few years.
After learning of a recent security incident, Anton realizes that another crucial step will be notifying customers. Kenneth insists that two lost hard drives in question are not cause for concern; all of the data was encrypted and not sensitive in nature. Anton does not want to take any chances, however. He intends on sending notice letters to all employees and customers to be safe.
Anton must also check for compliance with all legislative, regulatory, and market requirements related to privacy protection. Kenneth oversaw the development of the company’s online presence about ten years ago, but Anton is not confident about his understanding of recent online marketing laws. Anton is assigning another trusted employee with a law background the task of the compliance assessment. After a thorough analysis, Anton knows the company should be safe for another five years, at which time he can order another check. Documentation of this analysis will show auditors due diligence.
Anton has started down a long road toward improved management of the company, but he knows the effort is worth it. Anton wants his uncle’s legacy to continue for many years to come.
What would the company’s legal team most likely recommend to Anton regarding his planned communication with customers?
A. To send consistent communication.
B. To shift to electronic communication.
C. To delay communications until local authorities are informed.
D. To consider under what circumstances communication is necessary.
To consider under what circumstances communication is necessary.
Why were the nongovernmental privacy organizations, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), established?
A. To promote consumer confidence in the Internet industry.
B. To improve the user experience during online shopping.
C. To protect civil liberties and raise consumer awareness.
D. To promote security on the Internet through strong encryption.
To protect civil liberties and raise consumer awareness
What is the main function of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Privacy Framework?
A. Enabling regional data transfers.
B. Protecting data from parties outside the region.
C. Establishing legal requirements for privacy protection in the region.
D. Marketing privacy protection technologies developed in the region.
Enabling regional data trasfers
Overall, the function of the APEC Privacy Framework is to promote the protection of personal information while facilitating cross-border trade and commerce in the Asia-Pacific region, and to encourage cooperation and capacity building among APEC member economies in the area of privacy protection.
Which of the following is TRUE about the Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) process as required under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)?
A. The DPIA result must be reported to the corresponding supervisory authority.
B. The DPIA report must be published to demonstrate the transparency of the data processing.
C. The DPIA must include a description of the proposed processing operation and its purpose.
D. The DPIA is required if the processing activity entails risk to the rights and freedoms of an EU individual.
The DPIA must include a description of the proposed processing operation and its purpose.
As a Data Protection Officer (DPO), one of your roles entails monitoring changes in laws and regulations and updating policies accordingly.
How would you most effectively execute this responsibility?
A. Consult an external lawyer.
B. Regularly engage regulators.
C. Attend workshops and interact with other professionals.
D. Subscribe to email list-serves that report on regulatory change
D. Subscribe to email list-serves that report on regulatory change
John is the new privacy officer at the prestigious international law firm – A&M LLP. A&M LLP is very proud of its reputation in the practice areas of Trusts & Estates and Merger & Acquisition in both U.S. and Europe. During lunch with a colleague from the Information Technology department, John heard that the Head of IT, Derrick, is about to outsource the firm’s email continuity service to their existing email security vendor – MessageSafe. Being successful as an email hygiene vendor, MessageSafe is expanding its business by leasing cloud infrastructure from Cloud Inc. to host email continuity service for A&M LLP.
John is very concerned about this initiative. He recalled that MessageSafe was in the news six months ago due to a security breach. Immediately, John did a quick research of MessageSafe’s previous breach and learned that the breach was caused by an unintentional mistake by an IT administrator. He scheduled a meeting with Derrick to address his concerns.
At the meeting, Derrick emphasized that email is the primary method for the firm’s lawyers to communicate with clients, thus it is critical to have the email continuity service to avoid any possible email downtime. Derrick has been using the anti-spam service provided by MessageSafe for five years and is very happy with the quality of service provided by MessageSafe. In addition to the significant discount offered by MessageSafe, Derrick emphasized that he can also speed up the onboarding process since the firm already has a service contract in place with MessageSafe. The existing on-premises email continuity solution is about to reach its end of life very soon and he doesn’t have the time or resource to look for another solution. Furthermore, the off-premises email continuity service will only be turned on when the email service at A&M LLP’s primary and secondary data centers are both down, and the email messages stored at MessageSafe site for continuity service will be automatically deleted after 30 days.
Which of the following is the most effective control to enforce MessageSafe’s implementation of appropriate technical countermeasures to protect the personal data received from A&M LLP?
A. MessageSafe must apply due diligence before trusting Cloud Inc. with the personal data received from A&M LLP.
B. MessageSafe must flow-down its data protection contract terms with A&M LLP to Cloud Inc.
C. MessageSafe must apply appropriate security controls on the cloud infrastructure.
D. MessageSafe must notify A&M LLP of a data breach.
MessageSafe must flow-down its data protection contract terms with A&M LLP to Cloud Inc.
John is the new privacy officer at the prestigious international law firm – A&M LLP. A&M LLP is very proud of its reputation in the practice areas of Trusts & Estates and Merger & Acquisition in both U.S. and Europe. During lunch with a colleague from the Information Technology department, John heard that the Head of IT, Derrick, is about to outsource the firm’s email continuity service to their existing email security vendor – MessageSafe. Being successful as an email hygiene vendor, MessageSafe is expanding its business by leasing cloud infrastructure from Cloud Inc. to host email continuity service for A&M LLP.
John is very concerned about this initiative. He recalled that MessageSafe was in the news six months ago due to a security breach. Immediately, John did a quick research of MessageSafe’s previous breach and learned that the breach was caused by an unintentional mistake by an IT administrator. He scheduled a meeting with Derrick to address his concerns.
At the meeting, Derrick emphasized that email is the primary method for the firm’s lawyers to communicate with clients, thus it is critical to have the email continuity service to avoid any possible email downtime. Derrick has been using the anti-spam service provided by MessageSafe for five years and is very happy with the quality of service provided by MessageSafe. In addition to the significant discount offered by MessageSafe, Derrick emphasized that he can also speed up the onboarding process since the firm already has a service contract in place with MessageSafe. The existing on-premises email continuity solution is about to reach its end of life very soon and he doesn’t have the time or resource to look for another solution. Furthermore, the off- premises email continuity service will only be turned on when the email service at A&M LLP’s primary and secondary data centers are both down, and the email messages stored at MessageSafe site for continuity service will be automatically deleted after 30 days.
Which of the following is a TRUE statement about the relationship among the organizations?
A. Cloud Inc. must notify A&M LLP of a data breach immediately.
B. MessageSafe is liable if Cloud Inc. fails to protect data from A&M LLP.
C. Cloud Inc. should enter into a data processor agreement with A&M LLP.
D. A&M LLP’s service contract must be amended to list Cloud Inc. as a sub-processor.
A&M LLP’s service contract must be amended to list Cloud Inc. as a sub-processor.
John is the new privacy officer at the prestigious international law firm – A&M LLP. A&M LLP is very proud of its reputation in the practice areas of Trusts & Estates and Merger & Acquisition in both U.S. and Europe. During lunch with a colleague from the Information Technology department, John heard that the Head of IT, Derrick, is about to outsource the firm’s email continuity service to their existing email security vendor – MessageSafe. Being successful as an email hygiene vendor, MessageSafe is expanding its business by leasing cloud infrastructure from Cloud Inc. to host email continuity service for A&M LLP.
John is very concerned about this initiative. He recalled that MessageSafe was in the news six months ago due to a security breach. Immediately, John did a quick research of MessageSafe’s previous breach and learned that the breach was caused by an unintentional mistake by an IT administrator. He scheduled a meeting with Derrick to address his concerns.
At the meeting, Derrick emphasized that email is the primary method for the firm’s lawyers to communicate with clients, thus it is critical to have the email continuity service to avoid any possible email downtime. Derrick has been using the anti-spam service provided by MessageSafe for five years and is very happy with the quality of service provided by MessageSafe. In addition to the significant discount offered by MessageSafe, Derrick emphasized that he can also speed up the onboarding process since the firm already has a service contract in place with MessageSafe. The existing on-premises email continuity solution is about to reach its end of life very soon and he doesn’t have the time or resource to look for another solution. Furthermore, the off- premises email continuity service will only be turned on when the email service at A&M LLP’s primary and secondary data centers are both down, and the email messages stored at MessageSafe site for continuity service will be automatically deleted after 30 days.
Which of the following is NOT an obligation of MessageSafe as the email continuity service provider for A&M LLP?
A. Privacy compliance.
B. Security commitment.
C. Certifications to relevant frameworks.
D. Data breach notification to A&M LLP.
Certifications to relevant frameworks.
In privacy protection, what is a “covered entity”?
A. Personal data collected by a privacy organization.
B. An organization subject to the privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
C. A privacy office or team fully responsible for protecting personal information.
D. Hidden gaps in privacy protection that may go unnoticed without expert analysis.
An organization subject to the privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
Which of the following best describes proper compliance for an international organization using Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) as a controller or processor?
A. Employees must sign an ad hoc contractual agreement each time personal data is exported.
B. All employees are subject to the rules in their entirety, regardless of where the work is taking place.
C. All employees must follow the privacy regulations of the jurisdictions where the current scope of their work is established.
D. Employees who control personal data must complete a rigorous certification procedure, as they are exempt from legal enforcement.
All employees are subject to the rules in their entirety, regardless of where the work is taking place.
Richard McAdams recently graduated law school and decided to return to the small town of Lexington, Virginia to help run his aging grandfather’s law practice. The elder McAdams desired a limited, lighter role in the practice, with the hope that his grandson would eventually take over when he fully retires. In addition to hiring Richard, Mr. McAdams employs two paralegals, an administrative assistant, and a part-time IT specialist who handles all of their basic networking needs. He plans to hire more employees once Richard gets settled and assesses the office’s strategies for growth.
Immediately upon arrival, Richard was amazed at the amount of work that needed to done in order to modernize the office, mostly in regard to the handling of clients’ personal data. His first goal is to digitize all the records kept in file cabinets, as many of the documents contain personally identifiable financial and medical data. Also, Richard has noticed the massive amount of copying by the administrative assistant throughout the day, a practice that not only adds daily to the number of files in the file cabinets, but may create security issues unless a formal policy is firmly in place Richard is also concerned with the overuse of the communal copier/printer located in plain view of clients who frequent the building. Yet another area of concern is the use of the same fax machine by all of the employees. Richard hopes to reduce its use dramatically in order to ensure that personal data receives the utmost security and protection, and eventually move toward a strict Internet faxing policy by the year’s end.
Richard expressed his concerns to his grandfather, who agreed, that updating data storage, data security, and an overall approach to increasing the protection of personal data in all facets is necessary Mr. McAdams granted him the freedom and authority to do so. Now Richard is not only beginning a career as an attorney, but also functioning as the privacy officer of the small firm. Richard plans to meet with the IT employee the following day, to get insight into how the office computer system is currently set-up and managed.
Richard believes that a transition from the use of fax machine to Internet faxing provides all of the following security benefits EXCEPT?
A. Greater accessibility to the faxes at an off-site location.
B. The ability to encrypt the transmitted faxes through a secure server.
C. Reduction of the risk of data being seen or copied by unauthorized personnel.
D. The ability to store faxes electronically, either on the user’s PC or a password-protected network server.
Greater accessibility to the faxes at an off-site location.
Richard McAdams recently graduated law school and decided to return to the small town of Lexington, Virginia to help run his aging grandfather’s law practice. The elder McAdams desired a limited, lighter role in the practice, with the hope that his grandson would eventually take over when he fully retires. In addition to hiring Richard, Mr. McAdams employs two paralegals, an administrative assistant, and a part-time IT specialist who handles all of their basic networking needs. He plans to hire more employees once Richard gets settled and assesses the office’s strategies for growth.
Immediately upon arrival, Richard was amazed at the amount of work that needed to done in order to modernize the office, mostly in regard to the handling of clients’ personal data. His first goal is to digitize all the records kept in file cabinets, as many of the documents contain personally identifiable financial and medical data. Also, Richard has noticed the massive amount of copying by the administrative assistant throughout the day, a practice that not only adds daily to the number of files in the file cabinets, but may create security issues unless a formal policy is firmly in place Richard is also concerned with the overuse of the communal copier/printer located in plain view of clients who frequent the building. Yet another area of concern is the use of the same fax machine by all of the employees. Richard hopes to reduce its use dramatically in order to ensure that personal data receives the utmost security and protection, and eventually move toward a strict Internet faxing policy by the year’s end.
Richard expressed his concerns to his grandfather, who agreed, that updating data storage, data security, and an overall approach to increasing the protection of personal data in all facets is necessary Mr. McAdams granted him the freedom and authority to do so. Now Richard is not only beginning a career as an attorney, but also functioning as the privacy officer of the small firm. Richard plans to meet with the IT employee the following day, to get insight into how the office computer system is currently set-up and managed.
As Richard begins to research more about Data Lifecycle Management (DLM), he discovers that the law office can lower the risk of a data breach by doing what?
A. Prioritizing the data by order of importance.
B. Minimizing the time it takes to retrieve the sensitive data.
C. Reducing the volume and the type of data that is stored in its system.
D. Increasing the number of experienced staff to code and categorize the incoming data.
Reducing the volume and the type of data that is stored in its system.
Richard McAdams recently graduated law school and decided to return to the small town of Lexington, Virginia to help run his aging grandfather’s law practice. The elder McAdams desired a limited, lighter role in the practice, with the hope that his grandson would eventually take over when he fully retires. In addition to hiring Richard, Mr. McAdams employs two paralegals, an administrative assistant, and a part-time IT specialist who handles all of their basic networking needs. He plans to hire more employees once Richard gets settled and assesses the office’s strategies for growth.
Immediately upon arrival, Richard was amazed at the amount of work that needed to done in order to modernize the office, mostly in regard to the handling of clients’ personal data. His first goal is to digitize all the records kept in file cabinets, as many of the documents contain personally identifiable financial and medical data. Also, Richard has noticed the massive amount of copying by the administrative assistant throughout the day, a practice that not only adds daily to the number of files in the file cabinets, but may create security issues unless a formal policy is firmly in place Richard is also concerned with the overuse of the communal copier/printer located in plain view of clients who frequent the building. Yet another area of concern is the use of the same fax machine by all of the employees. Richard hopes to reduce its use dramatically in order to ensure that personal data receives the utmost security and protection, and eventually move toward a strict Internet faxing policy by the year’s end.
Richard expressed his concerns to his grandfather, who agreed, that updating data storage, data security, and an overall approach to increasing the protection of personal data in all facets is necessary Mr. McAdams granted him the freedom and authority to do so. Now Richard is not only beginning a career as an attorney, but also functioning as the privacy officer of the small firm. Richard plans to meet with the IT employee the following day, to get insight into how the office computer system is currently set-up and managed.
Which of the following policy statements needs additional instructions in order to further protect the personal data of their clients?
A. All faxes sent from the office must be documented and the phone number used must be double checked to ensure a safe arrival.
B. All unused copies, prints, and faxes must be discarded in a designated recycling bin located near the work station and emptied daily.
C. Before any copiers, printers, or fax machines are replaced or resold, the hard drives of these devices must be deleted before leaving the office.
D. When sending a print job containing personal data, the user must not leave the information visible on the computer screen following the print command and must retrieve the printed document immediately.
B. All unused copies, prints, and faxes must be discarded in a designated recycling bin located near the work station and emptied daily.
but ppl are saying D!!
Richard McAdams recently graduated law school and decided to return to the small town of Lexington, Virginia to help run his aging grandfather’s law practice. The elder McAdams desired a limited, lighter role in the practice, with the hope that his grandson would eventually take over when he fully retires. In addition to hiring Richard, Mr. McAdams employs two paralegals, an administrative assistant, and a part-time IT specialist who handles all of their basic networking needs. He plans to hire more employees once Richard gets settled and assesses the office’s strategies for growth.
Immediately upon arrival, Richard was amazed at the amount of work that needed to done in order to modernize the office, mostly in regard to the handling of clients’ personal data. His first goal is to digitize all the records kept in file cabinets, as many of the documents contain personally identifiable financial and medical data. Also, Richard has noticed the massive amount of copying by the administrative assistant throughout the day, a practice that not only adds daily to the number of files in the file cabinets, but may create security issues unless a formal policy is firmly in place Richard is also concerned with the overuse of the communal copier/printer located in plain view of clients who frequent the building. Yet another area of concern is the use of the same fax machine by all of the employees. Richard hopes to reduce its use dramatically in order to ensure that personal data receives the utmost security and protection, and eventually move toward a strict Internet faxing policy by the year’s end.
Richard expressed his concerns to his grandfather, who agreed, that updating data storage, data security, and an overall approach to increasing the protection of personal data in all facets is necessary Mr. McAdams granted him the freedom and authority to do so. Now Richard is not only beginning a career as an attorney, but also functioning as the privacy officer of the small firm. Richard plans to meet with the IT employee the following day, to get insight into how the office computer system is currently set-up and managed.
Richard needs to closely monitor the vendor in charge of creating the firm’s database mainly because of what?
A. The vendor will be required to report any privacy violations to the appropriate authorities.
B. The vendor may not be aware of the privacy implications involved in the project.
C. The vendor may not be forthcoming about the vulnerabilities of the database.
D. The vendor will be in direct contact with all of the law firm’s personal data.
The vendor may not be aware of the privacy implications involved in the project.
What should be the first major goal of a company developing a new privacy program?
A. To survey potential funding sources for privacy team resources.
B. To schedule conversations with executives of affected departments.
C. To identify potential third-party processors of the organization’s information.
D. To create Data Lifecycle Management policies and procedures to limit data collection.
to identify potential 3rd party processors of the organization’s information
Which is TRUE about the scope and authority of data protection oversight authorities?
A. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) of Canada has the right to impose financial sanctions on violators.
B. All authority in the European Union rests with the Data Protection Commission (DPC).
C. No one agency officially oversees the enforcement of privacy regulations in the United States.
D. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Privacy Frameworks require all member nations to designate a national data protection authority.
No one agency officially oversees the enforcement of privacy regulations in the United States.
What should a privacy professional keep in mind when selecting which metrics to collect?
A. Metrics should be reported to the public.
B. The number of metrics should be limited at first.
C. Metrics should reveal strategies for increasing company earnings.
D. A variety of metrics should be collected before determining their specific functions.
The number of metrics should be limited at first.
Amira is thrilled about the sudden expansion of NatGen. As the joint Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with her long-time business partner Sadie, Amira has watched the company grow into a major competitor in the green energy market. The current line of products includes wind turbines, solar energy panels, and equipment for geothermal systems. A talented team of developers means that NatGen’s line of products will only continue to grow.
With the expansion, Amira and Sadie have received advice from new senior staff members brought on to help manage the company’s growth. One recent suggestion has been to combine the legal and security functions of the company to ensure observance of privacy laws and the company’s own privacy policy. This sounds overly complicated to Amira, who wants departments to be able to use, collect, store, and dispose of customer data in ways that will best suit their needs. She does not want administrative oversight and complex structuring to get in the way of people doing innovative work.
Sadie has a similar outlook. The new Chief Information Officer (CIO) has proposed what Sadie believes is an unnecessarily long timetable for designing a new privacy program. She has assured him that NatGen will use the best possible equipment for electronic storage of customer and employee data. She simply needs a list of equipment and an estimate of its cost. But the CIO insists that many issues are necessary to consider before the company gets to that stage.
Regardless, Sadie and Amira insist on giving employees space to do their jobs. Both CEOs want to entrust the monitoring of employee policy compliance to low-level managers. Amira and Sadie believe these managers can adjust the company privacy policy according to what works best for their particular departments. NatGen’s CEOs know that flexible interpretations of the privacy policy in the name of promoting green energy would be highly unlikely to raise any concerns with their customer base, as long as the data is always used in course of normal business activities.
Perhaps what has been most perplexing to Sadie and Amira has been the CIO’s recommendation to institute a privacy compliance hotline. Sadie and Amira have relented on this point, but they hope to compromise by allowing employees to take turns handling reports of privacy policy violations. The implementation will be easy because the employees need no special preparation. They will simply have to document any concerns they hear.
Sadie and Amira are aware that it will be challenging to stay true to their principles and guard against corporate culture strangling creativity and employee morale. They hope that all senior staff will see the benefit of trying a unique approach.
What Data Lifecycle Management (DLM) principle should the company follow if they end up allowing departments to interpret the privacy policy differently?
A. Prove the authenticity of the company’s records.
B. Arrange for official credentials for staff members.
C. Adequately document reasons for inconsistencies.
D. Create categories to reflect degrees of data importance.
Adequately document reasons for inconsistencies.
Amira is thrilled about the sudden expansion of NatGen. As the joint Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with her long-time business partner Sadie, Amira has watched the company grow into a major competitor in the green energy market. The current line of products includes wind turbines, solar energy panels, and equipment for geothermal systems. A talented team of developers means that NatGen’s line of products will only continue to grow.
With the expansion, Amira and Sadie have received advice from new senior staff members brought on to help manage the company’s growth. One recent suggestion has been to combine the legal and security functions of the company to ensure observance of privacy laws and the company’s own privacy policy. This sounds overly complicated to Amira, who wants departments to be able to use, collect, store, and dispose of customer data in ways that will best suit their needs. She does not want administrative oversight and complex structuring to get in the way of people doing innovative work.
Sadie has a similar outlook. The new Chief Information Officer (CIO) has proposed what Sadie believes is an unnecessarily long timetable for designing a new privacy program. She has assured him that NatGen will use the best possible equipment for electronic storage of customer and employee data. She simply needs a list of equipment and an estimate of its cost. But the CIO insists that many issues are necessary to consider before the company gets to that stage.
Regardless, Sadie and Amira insist on giving employees space to do their jobs. Both CEOs want to entrust the monitoring of employee policy compliance to low-level managers. Amira and Sadie believe these managers can adjust the company privacy policy according to what works best for their particular departments. NatGen’s CEOs know that flexible interpretations of the privacy policy in the name of promoting green energy would be highly unlikely to raise any concerns with their customer base, as long as the data is always used in course of normal business activities.
Perhaps what has been most perplexing to Sadie and Amira has been the CIO’s recommendation to institute a privacy compliance hotline. Sadie and Amira have relented on this point, but they hope to compromise by allowing employees to take turns handling reports of privacy policy violations. The implementation will be easy because the employees need no special preparation. They will simply have to document any concerns they hear.
Sadie and Amira are aware that it will be challenging to stay true to their principles and guard against corporate culture strangling creativity and employee morale. They hope that all senior staff will see the benefit of trying a unique approach.
What is the most likely reason the Chief Information Officer (CIO) believes that generating a list of needed IT equipment is NOT adequate?
A. The company needs to have policies and procedures in place to guide the purchasing decisions.
B. The privacy notice for customers and the Business Continuity Plan (BCP) still need to be reviewed.
C. Staff members across departments need time to review technical information concerning any new databases.
D. Senior staff members need to first commit to adopting a minimum number of Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs).
The company needs to have policies and procedures in place to guide the purchasing decisions.
Amira is thrilled about the sudden expansion of NatGen. As the joint Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with her long-time business partner Sadie, Amira has watched the company grow into a major competitor in the green energy market. The current line of products includes wind turbines, solar energy panels, and equipment for geothermal systems. A talented team of developers means that NatGen’s line of products will only continue to grow.
With the expansion, Amira and Sadie have received advice from new senior staff members brought on to help manage the company’s growth. One recent suggestion has been to combine the legal and security functions of the company to ensure observance of privacy laws and the company’s own privacy policy. This sounds overly complicated to Amira, who wants departments to be able to use, collect, store, and dispose of customer data in ways that will best suit their needs. She does not want administrative oversight and complex structuring to get in the way of people doing innovative work.
Sadie has a similar outlook. The new Chief Information Officer (CIO) has proposed what Sadie believes is an unnecessarily long timetable for designing a new privacy program. She has assured him that NatGen will use the best possible equipment for electronic storage of customer and employee data. She simply needs a list of equipment and an estimate of its cost. But the CIO insists that many issues are necessary to consider before the company gets to that stage.
Regardless, Sadie and Amira insist on giving employees space to do their jobs. Both CEOs want to entrust the monitoring of employee policy compliance to low-level managers. Amira and Sadie believe these managers can adjust the company privacy policy according to what works best for their particular departments. NatGen’s CEOs know that flexible interpretations of the privacy policy in the name of promoting green energy would be highly unlikely to raise any concerns with their customer base, as long as the data is always used in course of normal business activities.
Perhaps what has been most perplexing to Sadie and Amira has been the CIO’s recommendation to institute a privacy compliance hotline. Sadie and Amira have relented on this point, but they hope to compromise by allowing employees to take turns handling reports of privacy policy violations. The implementation will be easy because the employees need no special preparation. They will simply have to document any concerns they hear.
Sadie and Amira are aware that it will be challenging to stay true to their principles and guard against corporate culture strangling creativity and employee morale. They hope that all senior staff will see the benefit of trying a unique approach.
If Amira and Sadie’s ideas about adherence to the company’s privacy policy go unchecked, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could potentially take action against NatGen for what?
A. Deceptive practices.
B. Failing to institute the hotline.
C. Failure to notify of processing.
D. Negligence in consistent training.
Deceptive practices.
Amira is thrilled about the sudden expansion of NatGen. As the joint Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with her long-time business partner Sadie, Amira has watched the company grow into a major competitor in the green energy market. The current line of products includes wind turbines, solar energy panels, and equipment for geothermal systems. A talented team of developers means that NatGen’s line of products will only continue to grow.
With the expansion, Amira and Sadie have received advice from new senior staff members brought on to help manage the company’s growth. One recent suggestion has been to combine the legal and security functions of the company to ensure observance of privacy laws and the company’s own privacy policy. This sounds overly complicated to Amira, who wants departments to be able to use, collect, store, and dispose of customer data in ways that will best suit their needs. She does not want administrative oversight and complex structuring to get in the way of people doing innovative work.
Sadie has a similar outlook. The new Chief Information Officer (CIO) has proposed what Sadie believes is an unnecessarily long timetable for designing a new privacy program. She has assured him that NatGen will use the best possible equipment for electronic storage of customer and employee data. She simply needs a list of equipment and an estimate of its cost. But the CIO insists that many issues are necessary to consider before the company gets to that stage.
Regardless, Sadie and Amira insist on giving employees space to do their jobs. Both CEOs want to entrust the monitoring of employee policy compliance to low-level managers. Amira and Sadie believe these managers can adjust the company privacy policy according to what works best for their particular departments. NatGen’s CEOs know that flexible interpretations of the privacy policy in the name of promoting green energy would be highly unlikely to raise any concerns with their customer base, as long as the data is always used in course of normal business activities.
Perhaps what has been most perplexing to Sadie and Amira has been the CIO’s recommendation to institute a privacy compliance hotline. Sadie and Amira have relented on this point, but they hope to compromise by allowing employees to take turns handling reports of privacy policy violations. The implementation will be easy because the employees need no special preparation. They will simply have to document any concerns they hear.
Sadie and Amira are aware that it will be challenging to stay true to their principles and guard against corporate culture strangling creativity and employee morale. They hope that all senior staff will see the benefit of trying a unique approach.
Based on the scenario, what additional change will increase the effectiveness of the privacy compliance hotline?
A. Outsourcing the hotline.
B. A system for staff education.
C. Strict communication channels.
D. An ethics complaint department.
A system for staff education.
If an organization maintains a separate ethics office, to whom would its officer typically report to in order to retain the greatest degree of independence?
A. The Board of Directors.
B. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
C. The Human Resources (HR) Director.
D. The organization’s General Counsel.
The Board of Directors.
What is a key feature of the privacy metric template adapted from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)?
A. It provides suggestions about how to collect and measure data.
B. It can be tailored to an organization’s particular needs.
C. It is updated annually to reflect changes in government policy.
D. It is focused on organizations that do business internationally.
It provides suggestions about how to collect and measure data.
What United States federal law requires financial institutions to declare their personal data collection practices?
A. The Kennedy-Hatch Disclosure Act of 1997.
B. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.
C. SUPCLA, or the federal Superprivacy Act of 2001.
D. The Financial Portability and Accountability Act of 2006.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program’s sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company’s “old guard” among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient “buy-in” to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?
How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
How can the company’s privacy training program best be further developed?
A. Through targeted curricula designed for specific departments.
B. By adopting e-learning to reduce the need for instructors.
C. By using industry standard off-the-shelf programs.
D. Through a review of recent data breaches.
Through targeted curricula designed for specific departments.
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program’s sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company’s “old guard” among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient “buy-in” to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?
How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
Which of the following would be most effectively used as a guide to a systems approach to implementing data protection?
A. Data Lifecycle Management Standards.
B. United Nations Privacy Agency Standards.
C. International Organization for Standardization 9000 Series.
D. International Organization for Standardization 27000 Series.
International Organization for Standardization 27000 Series.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program’s sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company’s “old guard” among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient “buy-in” to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?
How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
What stage of the privacy operational life cycle best describes the company’s current privacy program?
A. Assess.
B. Protect.
C. Respond.
D. Sustain.
Sustain
Please use the following to answer the next question:
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program’s sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company’s “old guard” among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient “buy-in” to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?
How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
What practice would afford the Director the most rigorous way to check on the program’s compliance with laws, regulations and industry best practices?
A. Auditing.
B. Monitoring.
C. Assessment.
D. Forensics.
Auditing
Please use the following to answer the next question:
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program’s sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company’s “old guard” among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient “buy-in” to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?
How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
What analytic can be used to track the financial viability of the program as it develops?
A. Cost basis.
B. Gap analysis.
C. Return to investment.
D. Breach impact modeling.
Return to investment.
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program’s sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company’s “old guard” among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient “buy-in” to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?
How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
What process could most effectively be used to add privacy protections to a new, comprehensive program being developed at the company?
A. Privacy by Design (PbD).
B. Privacy Step Assessment.
C. Information Security Planning.
D. Innovation Privacy Standards.
Privacy by Design (PbD).
Which of the following indicates you have developed the right privacy framework for your organization?
A. It includes a privacy assessment of each major system.
B. It improves the consistency of the privacy program.
C. It works at a different type of organization.
D. It identifies all key stakeholders by name.
It improves the consistency of the privacy program
Rationalizing requirements in order to comply with the various privacy requirements required by applicable law and regulation does NOT include which of the following?
A. Harmonizing shared obligations and privacy rights across varying legislation and/or regulators.
B. Implementing a solution that significantly addresses shared obligations and privacy rights.
C. Applying the strictest standard for obligations and privacy rights that doesn’t violate privacy laws elsewhere.
D. Addressing requirements that fall outside the common obligations and rights (outliers) on a case-by-case basis.
Applying the strictest standard for obligations and privacy rights that doesn’t violate privacy laws elsewhere.
What is the name for the privacy strategy model that describes delegated decision making?
A. De-centralized.
B. De-functionalized.
C. Hybrid.
D. Matrix.
De-centralized.
Which of the following controls does the PCI DSS framework NOT require?
A. Implement strong asset control protocols.
B. Implement strong access control measures.
C. Maintain an information security policy.
D. Maintain a vulnerability management program.
Implement strong asset control protocols.
Which of the following privacy frameworks are legally binding?
A. Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs).
B. Generally Accepted Privacy Principles (GAPP).
C. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Privacy Framework.
D. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines.
Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs).
Which of the following is an example of Privacy by Design (PbD)?
A. A company hires a professional to structure a privacy program that anticipates the increasing demands of new laws.
B. The human resources group develops a training program for employees to become certified in privacy policy.
C. A labor union insists that the details of employers’ data protection methods be documented in a new contract.
D. The information technology group uses privacy considerations to inform the development of new networking software.
D. The information technology group uses privacy considerations to inform the development of new networking software.
In regards to the collection of personal data conducted by an organization, what must the data subject be allowed to do?
A. Evaluate the qualifications of a third-party processor before any data is transferred to that processor.
B. Obtain a guarantee of prompt notification in instances involving unauthorized access of the data.
C. Set a time-limit as to how long the personal data may be stored by the organization.
D. Challenge the authenticity of the personal data and have it corrected if needed.
D. Challenge the authenticity of the personal data and have it corrected if needed
It’s just what you were afraid of. Without consulting you, the information technology director at your organization launched a new initiative to encourage employees to use personal devices for conducting business. The initiative made purchasing a new, high-specification laptop computer an attractive option, with discounted laptops paid for as a payroll deduction spread over a year of paychecks. The organization is also paying the sales taxes. It’s a great deal, and after a month, more than half the organization’s employees have signed on and acquired new laptops. Walking through the facility, you see them happily customizing and comparing notes on their new computers, and at the end of the day, most take their laptops with them, potentially carrying personal data to their homes or other unknown locations. It’s enough to give you data-protection nightmares, and you’ve pointed out to the information technology Director and many others in the organization the potential hazards of this new practice, including the inevitability of eventual data loss or theft.
Today you have in your office a representative of the organization’s marketing department who shares with you, reluctantly, a story with potentially serious consequences. The night before, straight from work, with laptop in hand, he went to the Bull and Horn Pub to play billiards with his friends. A fine night of sport and socializing began, with the laptop “safely” tucked on a bench, beneath his jacket. Later that night, when it was time to depart, he retrieved the jacket, but the laptop was gone. It was not beneath the bench or on another bench nearby. The waitstaff had not seen it. His friends were not playing a joke on him. After a sleepless night, he confirmed it this morning, stopping by the pub to talk to the cleanup crew. They had not found it. The laptop was missing. Stolen, it seems. He looks at you, embarrassed and upset.
You ask him if the laptop contains any personal data from clients, and, sadly, he nods his head, yes. He believes it contains files on about 100 clients, including names, addresses and governmental identification numbers. He sighs and places his head in his hands in despair.
Which is the best way to ensure that data on personal equipment is protected?
A. User risk training.
B. Biometric security.
C. Encryption of the data.
D. Frequent data backups
Encryption of the data.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
It’s just what you were afraid of. Without consulting you, the information technology director at your organization launched a new initiative to encourage employees to use personal devices for conducting business. The initiative made purchasing a new, high-specification laptop computer an attractive option, with discounted laptops paid for as a payroll deduction spread over a year of paychecks. The organization is also paying the sales taxes. It’s a great deal, and after a month, more than half the organization’s employees have signed on and acquired new laptops. Walking through the facility, you see them happily customizing and comparing notes on their new computers, and at the end of the day, most take their laptops with them, potentially carrying personal data to their homes or other unknown locations. It’s enough to give you data-protection nightmares, and you’ve pointed out to the information technology Director and many others in the organization the potential hazards of this new practice, including the inevitability of eventual data loss or theft.
Today you have in your office a representative of the organization’s marketing department who shares with you, reluctantly, a story with potentially serious consequences. The night before, straight from work, with laptop in hand, he went to the Bull and Horn Pub to play billiards with his friends. A fine night of sport and socializing began, with the laptop “safely” tucked on a bench, beneath his jacket. Later that night, when it was time to depart, he retrieved the jacket, but the laptop was gone. It was not beneath the bench or on another bench nearby. The waitstaff had not seen it. His friends were not playing a joke on him. After a sleepless night, he confirmed it this morning, stopping by the pub to talk to the cleanup crew. They had not found it. The laptop was missing. Stolen, it seems. He looks at you, embarrassed and upset.
You ask him if the laptop contains any personal data from clients, and, sadly, he nods his head, yes. He believes it contains files on about 100 clients, including names, addresses and governmental identification numbers. He sighs and places his head in his hands in despair.
From a business standpoint, what is the most productive way to view employee use of personal equipment for work-related tasks?
A. The use of personal equipment is a cost-effective measure that leads to no greater security risks than are always present in a modern organization.
B. Any computer or other equipment is company property whenever it is used for company business.
C. While the company may not own the equipment, it is required to protect the business-related data on any equipment used by its employees.
D. The use of personal equipment must be reduced as it leads to inevitable security risks.
While the company may not own the equipment, it is required to protect the business-related data on any equipment used by its employees.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
It’s just what you were afraid of. Without consulting you, the information technology director at your organization launched a new initiative to encourage employees to use personal devices for conducting business. The initiative made purchasing a new, high-specification laptop computer an attractive option, with discounted laptops paid for as a payroll deduction spread over a year of paychecks. The organization is also paying the sales taxes. It’s a great deal, and after a month, more than half the organization’s employees have signed on and acquired new laptops. Walking through the facility, you see them happily customizing and comparing notes on their new computers, and at the end of the day, most take their laptops with them, potentially carrying personal data to their homes or other unknown locations. It’s enough to give you data-protection nightmares, and you’ve pointed out to the information technology Director and many others in the organization the potential hazards of this new practice, including the inevitability of eventual data loss or theft.
Today you have in your office a representative of the organization’s marketing department who shares with you, reluctantly, a story with potentially serious consequences. The night before, straight from work, with laptop in hand, he went to the Bull and Horn Pub to play billiards with his friends. A fine night of sport and socializing began, with the laptop “safely” tucked on a bench, beneath his jacket. Later that night, when it was time to depart, he retrieved the jacket, but the laptop was gone. It was not beneath the bench or on another bench nearby. The waitstaff had not seen it. His friends were not playing a joke on him. After a sleepless night, he confirmed it this morning, stopping by the pub to talk to the cleanup crew. They had not found it. The laptop was missing. Stolen, it seems. He looks at you, embarrassed and upset.
You ask him if the laptop contains any personal data from clients, and, sadly, he nods his head, yes. He believes it contains files on about 100 clients, including names, addresses and governmental identification numbers. He sighs and places his head in his hands in despair.
In order to determine the best course of action, how should this incident most productively be viewed?
A. As the accidental loss of personal property containing data that must be restored.
B. As a potential compromise of personal information through unauthorized access.
C. As an incident that requires the abrupt initiation of a notification campaign.
D. As the premeditated theft of company data, until shown otherwise.
As a potential compromise of personal information through unauthorized access.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
It’s just what you were afraid of. Without consulting you, the information technology director at your organization launched a new initiative to encourage employees to use personal devices for conducting business. The initiative made purchasing a new, high-specification laptop computer an attractive option, with discounted laptops paid for as a payroll deduction spread over a year of paychecks. The organization is also paying the sales taxes. It’s a great deal, and after a month, more than half the organization’s employees have signed on and acquired new laptops. Walking through the facility, you see them happily customizing and comparing notes on their new computers, and at the end of the day, most take their laptops with them, potentially carrying personal data to their homes or other unknown locations. It’s enough to give you data-protection nightmares, and you’ve pointed out to the information technology Director and many others in the organization the potential hazards of this new practice, including the inevitability of eventual data loss or theft.
Today you have in your office a representative of the organization’s marketing department who shares with you, reluctantly, a story with potentially serious consequences. The night before, straight from work, with laptop in hand, he went to the Bull and Horn Pub to play billiards with his friends. A fine night of sport and socializing began, with the laptop “safely” tucked on a bench, beneath his jacket. Later that night, when it was time to depart, he retrieved the jacket, but the laptop was gone. It was not beneath the bench or on another bench nearby. The waitstaff had not seen it. His friends were not playing a joke on him. After a sleepless night, he confirmed it this morning, stopping by the pub to talk to the cleanup crew. They had not found it. The laptop was missing. Stolen, it seems. He looks at you, embarrassed and upset.
You ask him if the laptop contains any personal data from clients, and, sadly, he nods his head, yes. He believes it contains files on about 100 clients, including names, addresses and governmental identification numbers. He sighs and places his head in his hands in despair.
What should you do first to ascertain additional information about the loss of data?
A. Interview the person reporting the incident following a standard protocol.
B. Call the police to investigate even if you are unsure a crime occurred.
C. Investigate the background of the person reporting the incident.
D. Check company records of the latest backups to see what data may be recoverable.
Interview the person reporting the incident following a standard protocol.
Which is NOT an influence on the privacy environment external to an organization?
A. Management team priorities.
B. Regulations.
C. Consumer demand.
D. Technological advances.
Management team priorities.
How are individual program needs and specific organizational goals identified in privacy framework development?
A. By employing metrics to align privacy protection with objectives.
B. Through conversations with the privacy team.
C. By employing an industry-standard needs analysis.
D. Through creation of the business case.
By employing metrics to align privacy protection with objectives.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Natalia, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Nationwide Grill restaurant chain, had never seen her fellow executives so anxious. Last week, a data processing firm used by the company reported that its system may have been hacked, and customer data such as names, addresses, and birthdays may have been compromised. Although the attempt was proven unsuccessful, the scare has prompted several Nationwide Grill executives to question the company’s privacy program at today’s meeting.
Alice, a Vice President (VP), said that the incident could have opened the door to lawsuits, potentially damaging Nationwide Grill’s market position. The Chief Information Officer (CIO), Brendan, tried to assure her that even if there had been an actual breach, the chances of a successful suit against the company were slim. But Alice remained unconvinced.
Spencer – a former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and currently a senior advisor – said that he had always warned against the use of contractors for data processing. At the very least, he argued, they should be held contractually liable for telling customers about any security incidents. In his view, Nationwide Grill should not be forced to soil the company name for a problem it did not cause.
One of the Business Development (BD) executives, Haley, then spoke, imploring everyone to see reason. “Breaches can happen, despite organizations’ best efforts,” she remarked. “Reasonable preparedness is key.” She reminded everyone of the incident seven years ago when the large grocery chain Tinkerton’s had its financial information compromised after a large order of Nationwide Grill frozen dinners. As a long-time BD executive with a solid understanding of Tinkerton’s’s corporate culture, built up through many years of cultivating relationships, Haley was able to successfully manage the company’s incident response.
Spencer replied that acting with reason means allowing security to be handled by the security functions within the company – not BD staff. In a similar way, he said, Human Resources (HR) needs to do a better job training employees to prevent incidents. He pointed out that Nationwide Grill employees are overwhelmed with posters, emails, and memos from both HR and the ethics department related to the company’s privacy program. Both the volume and the duplication of information means that it is often ignored altogether.
Spencer said, “The company needs to dedicate itself to its privacy program and set regular in-person trainings for all staff once a month.”
Alice responded that the suggestion, while well-meaning, is not practical. With many locations, local HR departments need to have flexibility with their training schedules. Silently, Natalia agreed.
What is the most realistic step the organization can take to help diminish liability in the event of another incident?
A. Requiring the vendor to perform periodic internal audits.
B. Specifying mandatory data protection practices in vendor contracts.
C. Keeping the majority of processing activities within the organization.
D. Obtaining customer consent for any third-party processing of personal data.
Specifying mandatory data protection practices in vendor contracts
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Natalia, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Nationwide Grill restaurant chain, had never seen her fellow executives so anxious. Last week, a data processing firm used by the company reported that its system may have been hacked, and customer data such as names, addresses, and birthdays may have been compromised. Although the attempt was proven unsuccessful, the scare has prompted several Nationwide Grill executives to question the company’s privacy program at today’s meeting.
Alice, a Vice President (VP), said that the incident could have opened the door to lawsuits, potentially damaging Nationwide Grill’s market position. The Chief Information Officer (CIO), Brendan, tried to assure her that even if there had been an actual breach, the chances of a successful suit against the company were slim. But Alice remained unconvinced.
Spencer – a former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and currently a senior advisor – said that he had always warned against the use of contractors for data processing. At the very least, he argued, they should be held contractually liable for telling customers about any security incidents. In his view, Nationwide Grill should not be forced to soil the company name for a problem it did not cause.
One of the Business Development (BD) executives, Haley, then spoke, imploring everyone to see reason. “Breaches can happen, despite organizations’ best efforts,” she remarked. “Reasonable preparedness is key.” She reminded everyone of the incident seven years ago when the large grocery chain Tinkerton’s had its financial information compromised after a large order of Nationwide Grill frozen dinners. As a long-time BD executive with a solid understanding of Tinkerton’s’s corporate culture, built up through many years of cultivating relationships, Haley was able to successfully manage the company’s incident response.
Spencer replied that acting with reason means allowing security to be handled by the security functions within the company – not BD staff. In a similar way, he said, Human Resources (HR) needs to do a better job training employees to prevent incidents. He pointed out that Nationwide Grill employees are overwhelmed with posters, emails, and memos from both HR and the ethics department related to the company’s privacy program. Both the volume and the duplication of information means that it is often ignored altogether.
Spencer said, “The company needs to dedicate itself to its privacy program and set regular in-person trainings for all staff once a month.”
Alice responded that the suggestion, while well-meaning, is not practical. With many locations, local HR departments need to have flexibility with their training schedules. Silently, Natalia agreed.
Based on the scenario, Nationwide Grill needs to create better employee awareness of the company’s privacy program by doing what?
A. Varying the modes of communication.
B. Communicating to the staff more often.
C. Improving inter-departmental cooperation.
D. Requiring acknowledgment of company memos.
Varying the modes of communication
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Natalia, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Nationwide Grill restaurant chain, had never seen her fellow executives so anxious. Last week, a data processing firm used by the company reported that its system may have been hacked, and customer data such as names, addresses, and birthdays may have been compromised. Although the attempt was proven unsuccessful, the scare has prompted several Nationwide Grill executives to question the company’s privacy program at today’s meeting.
Alice, a Vice President (VP), said that the incident could have opened the door to lawsuits, potentially damaging Nationwide Grill’s market position. The Chief Information Officer (CIO), Brendan, tried to assure her that even if there had been an actual breach, the chances of a successful suit against the company were slim. But Alice remained unconvinced.
Spencer – a former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and currently a senior advisor – said that he had always warned against the use of contractors for data processing. At the very least, he argued, they should be held contractually liable for telling customers about any security incidents. In his view, Nationwide Grill should not be forced to soil the company name for a problem it did not cause.
One of the Business Development (BD) executives, Haley, then spoke, imploring everyone to see reason. “Breaches can happen, despite organizations’ best efforts,” she remarked. “Reasonable preparedness is key.” She reminded everyone of the incident seven years ago when the large grocery chain Tinkerton’s had its financial information compromised after a large order of Nationwide Grill frozen dinners. As a long-time BD executive with a solid understanding of Tinkerton’s’s corporate culture, built up through many years of cultivating relationships, Haley was able to successfully manage the company’s incident response.
Spencer replied that acting with reason means allowing security to be handled by the security functions within the company – not BD staff. In a similar way, he said, Human Resources (HR) needs to do a better job training employees to prevent incidents. He pointed out that Nationwide Grill employees are overwhelmed with posters, emails, and memos from both HR and the ethics department related to the company’s privacy program. Both the volume and the duplication of information means that it is often ignored altogether.
Spencer said, “The company needs to dedicate itself to its privacy program and set regular in-person trainings for all staff once a month.”
Alice responded that the suggestion, while well-meaning, is not practical. With many locations, local HR departments need to have flexibility with their training schedules. Silently, Natalia agreed.
How could the objection to Spencer’s training suggestion be addressed?
A. By requiring training only on an as-needed basis.
B. By offering alternative delivery methods for trainings.
C. By introducing a system of periodic refresher trainings.
D. By customizing training based on length of employee tenure.
By offering alternative delivery methods for trainings.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Natalia, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Nationwide Grill restaurant chain, had never seen her fellow executives so anxious. Last week, a data processing firm used by the company reported that its system may have been hacked, and customer data such as names, addresses, and birthdays may have been compromised. Although the attempt was proven unsuccessful, the scare has prompted several Nationwide Grill executives to question the company’s privacy program at today’s meeting.
Alice, a Vice President (VP), said that the incident could have opened the door to lawsuits, potentially damaging Nationwide Grill’s market position. The Chief Information Officer (CIO), Brendan, tried to assure her that even if there had been an actual breach, the chances of a successful suit against the company were slim. But Alice remained unconvinced.
Spencer – a former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and currently a senior advisor – said that he had always warned against the use of contractors for data processing. At the very least, he argued, they should be held contractually liable for telling customers about any security incidents. In his view, Nationwide Grill should not be forced to soil the company name for a problem it did not cause.
One of the Business Development (BD) executives, Haley, then spoke, imploring everyone to see reason. “Breaches can happen, despite organizations’ best efforts,” she remarked. “Reasonable preparedness is key.” She reminded everyone of the incident seven years ago when the large grocery chain Tinkerton’s had its financial information compromised after a large order of Nationwide Grill frozen dinners. As a long-time BD executive with a solid understanding of Tinkerton’s’s corporate culture, built up through many years of cultivating relationships, Haley was able to successfully manage the company’s incident response.
Spencer replied that acting with reason means allowing security to be handled by the security functions within the company – not BD staff. In a similar way, he said, Human Resources (HR) needs to do a better job training employees to prevent incidents. He pointed out that Nationwide Grill employees are overwhelmed with posters, emails, and memos from both HR and the ethics department related to the company’s privacy program. Both the volume and the duplication of information means that it is often ignored altogether.
Spencer said, “The company needs to dedicate itself to its privacy program and set regular in-person trainings for all staff once a month.”
Alice responded that the suggestion, while well-meaning, is not practical. With many locations, local HR departments need to have flexibility with their training schedules. Silently, Natalia agreed.
The senior advisor, Spencer, has a misconception regarding?
A. The amount of responsibility that a data controller retains.
B. The appropriate role of an organization’s security department.
C. The degree to which training can lessen the number of security incidents.
D. The role of Human Resources employees in an organization’s privacy program.
The amount of responsibility that a data controller retains
Formosa International operates in 20 different countries including the United States and France.
What organizational approach would make complying with a number of different regulations easier?
A. Data mapping.
B. Fair Information Practices.
C. Rationalizing requirements.
D. Decentralized privacy management.
Rationalizing requirements is an organizational approach that involves identifying and harmonizing the common elements of different privacy regulations and standards. This can make compliance easier and more efficient, as well as reduce the risk of conflicts or gaps in privacy protection. Rationalizing requirements can also help to create a consistent privacy policy and culture across different jurisdictions and business units.
When implementing Privacy by Design (PbD), what would NOT be a key consideration?
A. Collection limitation.
B. Data minimization.
C. Limitations on liability.
D. Purpose specification.
Limitations on liability.
For an organization that has just experienced a data breach, what might be the least relevant metric for a company’s privacy and governance team?
A. The number of security patches applied to company devices.
B. The number of privacy rights requests that have been exercised.
C. The number of Privacy Impact Assessments that have been completed.
D. The number of employees who have completed data awareness training.
The number of privacy rights requests that have been exercised
In which situation would a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) be the least likely to be required?
A. If a company created a credit-scoring platform five years ago.
B. If a health-care professional or lawyer processed personal data from a patient’s file.
C. If a social media company created a new product compiling personal data to generate user profiles.
D. If an after-school club processed children’s data to determine which children might have food allergies.
If a company created a credit-scoring platform five years ago.
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), what must be included in a written agreement between the controller and processor in relation to processing conducted on the controller’s behalf?
A. An obligation on the processor to report any personal data breach to the controller within 72 hours.
B. An obligation on both parties to report any serious personal data breach to the supervisory authority.
C. An obligation on both parties to agree to a termination of the agreement if the other party is responsible for a personal data breach.
D. An obligation on the processor to assist the controller in complying with the controller’s obligations to notify the supervisory authority about personal data breaches.
An obligation on the processor to assist the controller in complying with the controller’s obligations to notify the supervisory authority about personal data breaches.
Perhaps Jack Kelly should have stayed in the U.S. He enjoys a formidable reputation inside the company, Special Handling Shipping, for his work in reforming certain “rogue” offices. Last year, news broke that a police sting operation had revealed a drug ring operating in the Providence, Rhode Island office in the United States. Video from the office’s video surveillance cameras leaked to news operations showed a drug exchange between Special Handling staff and undercover officers.
In the wake of this incident, Kelly had been sent to Providence to change the “hands off” culture that upper management believed had let the criminal elements conduct their illicit transactions. After a few weeks under Kelly’s direction, the office became a model of efficiency and customer service. Kelly monitored his workers’ activities using the same cameras that had recorded the illegal conduct of their former co-workers.
Now Kelly has been charged with turning around the office in Cork, Ireland, another trouble spot. The company has received numerous reports of the staff leaving the office unattended. When Kelly arrived, he found that even when present, the staff often spent their days socializing or conducting personal business on their mobile phones. Again, he observed their behaviors using surveillance cameras. He issued written reprimands to six staff members based on the first day of video alone.
Much to Kelly’s surprise and chagrin, he and the company are now under investigation by the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland for allegedly violating the privacy rights of employees. Kelly was told that the company’s license for the cameras listed facility security as their main use, but he does not know why this matters. He has pointed out to his superiors that the company’s training programs on privacy protection and data collection mention nothing about surveillance video.
You are a privacy protection consultant, hired by the company to assess this incident, report on the legal and compliance issues, and recommend next steps.
What does this example best illustrate about training requirements for privacy protection?
A. Training needs must be weighed against financial costs.
B. Training on local laws must be implemented for all personnel.
C. Training must be repeated frequently to respond to new legislation.
D. Training must include assessments to verify that the material is mastered.
Training on local laws must be implemented for all personnel
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Perhaps Jack Kelly should have stayed in the U.S. He enjoys a formidable reputation inside the company, Special Handling Shipping, for his work in reforming certain “rogue” offices. Last year, news broke that a police sting operation had revealed a drug ring operating in the Providence, Rhode Island office in the United States. Video from the office’s video surveillance cameras leaked to news operations showed a drug exchange between Special Handling staff and undercover officers.
In the wake of this incident, Kelly had been sent to Providence to change the “hands off” culture that upper management believed had let the criminal elements conduct their illicit transactions. After a few weeks under Kelly’s direction, the office became a model of efficiency and customer service. Kelly monitored his workers’ activities using the same cameras that had recorded the illegal conduct of their former co-workers.
Now Kelly has been charged with turning around the office in Cork, Ireland, another trouble spot. The company has received numerous reports of the staff leaving the office unattended. When Kelly arrived, he found that even when present, the staff often spent their days socializing or conducting personal business on their mobile phones. Again, he observed their behaviors using surveillance cameras. He issued written reprimands to six staff members based on the first day of video alone.
Much to Kelly’s surprise and chagrin, he and the company are now under investigation by the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland for allegedly violating the privacy rights of employees. Kelly was told that the company’s license for the cameras listed facility security as their main use, but he does not know why this matters. He has pointed out to his superiors that the company’s training programs on privacy protection and data collection mention nothing about surveillance video.
You are a privacy protection consultant, hired by the company to assess this incident, report on the legal and compliance issues, and recommend next steps.
Knowing that the regulator is now investigating, what would be the best step to take?
A. Consult an attorney experienced in privacy law and litigation.
B. Use your background and knowledge to set a course of action.
C. If you know the organization is guilty, advise it to accept the punishment.
D. Negotiate the terms of a settlement before formal legal action takes place.
Consult an attorney experienced in privacy law and litigation.
SCENARIO:
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Perhaps Jack Kelly should have stayed in the U.S. He enjoys a formidable reputation inside the company, Special Handling Shipping, for his work in reforming certain “rogue” offices. Last year, news broke that a police sting operation had revealed a drug ring operating in the Providence, Rhode Island office in the United States. Video from the office’s video surveillance cameras leaked to news operations showed a drug exchange between Special Handling staff and undercover officers.
In the wake of this incident, Kelly had been sent to Providence to change the “hands off” culture that upper management believed had let the criminal elements conduct their illicit transactions. After a few weeks under Kelly’s direction, the office became a model of efficiency and customer service. Kelly monitored his workers’ activities using the same cameras that had recorded the illegal conduct of their former co-workers.
Now Kelly has been charged with turning around the office in Cork, Ireland, another trouble spot. The company has received numerous reports of the staff leaving the office unattended. When Kelly arrived, he found that even when present, the staff often spent their days socializing or conducting personal business on their mobile phones. Again, he observed their behaviors using surveillance cameras. He issued written reprimands to six staff members based on the first day of video alone.
Much to Kelly’s surprise and chagrin, he and the company are now under investigation by the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland for allegedly violating the privacy rights of employees. Kelly was told that the company’s license for the cameras listed facility security as their main use, but he does not know why this matters. He has pointed out to his superiors that the company’s training programs on privacy protection and data collection mention nothing about surveillance video.
You are a privacy protection consultant, hired by the company to assess this incident, report on the legal and compliance issues, and recommend next steps.
What should you advise this company regarding the status of security cameras at their offices in the United States?
Add security cameras at facilities that are now without them.
Set policies about the purpose and use of the security cameras.
Reduce the number of security cameras located inside the building.
Restrict access to surveillance video taken by the security cameras and destroy the recordings after a designated period of time.
Set policies about the purpose and use of the security cameras.
ou would like your organization to be independently audited to demonstrate compliance with international privacy standards and to identify gaps for remediation.
Which type of audit would help you achieve this objective?
First-party audit.
Second-party audit.
Third-party audit.
Fourth-party audit.
Third-party audit.
An organization’s business continuity plan or disaster recovery plan does NOT typically include what?
A. Recovery time objectives.
B. Emergency response guidelines.
C. Statement of organizational responsibilities.
D. Retention schedule for storage and destruction of information.
Retention schedule for storage and destruction of information.
SCENARIO:
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Edufox has hosted an annual convention of users of its famous e-learning software platform, and over time, it has become a grand event. It fills one of the large downtown conference hotels and overflows into the others, with several thousand attendees enjoying three days of presentations, panel discussions and networking. The convention is the centerpiece of the company’s product rollout schedule and a great training opportunity for current users. The sales force also encourages prospective clients to attend to get a better sense of the ways in which the system can be customized to meet diverse needs and understand that when they buy into this system, they are joining a community that feels like family.
This year’s conference is only three weeks away, and you have just heard news of a new initiative supporting it: a smartphone app for attendees. The app will support late registration, highlight the featured presentations and provide a mobile version of the conference program. It also links to a restaurant reservation system with the best cuisine in the areas featured. “It’s going to be great,” the developer, Deidre Hoffman, tells you, “if, that is, we actually get it working!” She laughs nervously but explains that because of the tight time frame she’d been given to build the app, she outsourced the job to a local firm. “It’s just three young people,” she says, “but they do great work.” She describes some of the other apps they have built. When asked how they were selected for this job, Deidre shrugs. “They do good work, so I chose them.”
Deidre is a terrific employee with a strong track record. That’s why she’s been charged to deliver this rushed project. You’re sure she has the best interests of the company at heart, and you don’t doubt that she’s under pressure to meet a deadline that cannot be pushed back. However, you have concerns about the app’s handling of personal data and its security safeguards. Over lunch in the break room, you start to talk to her about it, but she quickly tries to reassure you, “I’m sure with your help we can fix any security issues if we have to, but I doubt there’ll be any. These people build apps for a living, and they know what they’re doing. You worry too much, but that’s why you’re so good at your job!”
Since it is too late to restructure the contract with the vendor or prevent the app from being deployed, what is the best step for you to take next?
A. Implement a more comprehensive suite of information security controls than the one used by the vendor.
B. Ask the vendor for verifiable information about their privacy protections so weaknesses can be identified.
C. Develop security protocols for the vendor and mandate that they be deployed.
D. Insist on an audit of the vendor’s privacy procedures and safeguards.
Ask the vendor for verifiable information about their privacy protections so weaknesses can be identified.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Edufox has hosted an annual convention of users of its famous e-learning software platform, and over time, it has become a grand event. It fills one of the large downtown conference hotels and overflows into the others, with several thousand attendees enjoying three days of presentations, panel discussions and networking. The convention is the centerpiece of the company’s product rollout schedule and a great training opportunity for current users. The sales force also encourages prospective clients to attend to get a better sense of the ways in which the system can be customized to meet diverse needs and understand that when they buy into this system, they are joining a community that feels like family.
This year’s conference is only three weeks away, and you have just heard news of a new initiative supporting it: a smartphone app for attendees. The app will support late registration, highlight the featured presentations and provide a mobile version of the conference program. It also links to a restaurant reservation system with the best cuisine in the areas featured. “It’s going to be great,” the developer, Deidre Hoffman, tells you, “if, that is, we actually get it working!” She laughs nervously but explains that because of the tight time frame she’d been given to build the app, she outsourced the job to a local firm. “It’s just three young people,” she says, “but they do great work.” She describes some of the other apps they have built. When asked how they were selected for this job, Deidre shrugs. “They do good work, so I chose them.”
Deidre is a terrific employee with a strong track record. That’s why she’s been charged to deliver this rushed project. You’re sure she has the best interests of the company at heart, and you don’t doubt that she’s under pressure to meet a deadline that cannot be pushed back. However, you have concerns about the app’s handling of personal data and its security safeguards. Over lunch in the break room, you start to talk to her about it, but she quickly tries to reassure you, “I’m sure with your help we can fix any security issues if we have to, but I doubt there’ll be any. These people build apps for a living, and they know what they’re doing. You worry too much, but that’s why you’re so good at your job!”
Which is the best first step in understanding the data security practices of a potential vendor?
A. Requiring the vendor to complete a questionnaire assessing International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 27001 compliance.
B. Conducting a physical audit of the vendor’s facilities.
C. Conducting a penetration test of the vendor’s data security structure.
D. Examining investigation records of any breaches the vendor has experienced.
Requiring the vendor to complete a questionnaire assessing International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 27001 compliance.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Edufox has hosted an annual convention of users of its famous e-learning software platform, and over time, it has become a grand event. It fills one of the large downtown conference hotels and overflows into the others, with several thousand attendees enjoying three days of presentations, panel discussions and networking. The convention is the centerpiece of the company’s product rollout schedule and a great training opportunity for current users. The sales force also encourages prospective clients to attend to get a better sense of the ways in which the system can be customized to meet diverse needs and understand that when they buy into this system, they are joining a community that feels like family.
This year’s conference is only three weeks away, and you have just heard news of a new initiative supporting it: a smartphone app for attendees. The app will support late registration, highlight the featured presentations and provide a mobile version of the conference program. It also links to a restaurant reservation system with the best cuisine in the areas featured. “It’s going to be great,” the developer, Deidre Hoffman, tells you, “if, that is, we actually get it working!” She laughs nervously but explains that because of the tight time frame she’d been given to build the app, she outsourced the job to a local firm. “It’s just three young people,” she says, “but they do great work.” She describes some of the other apps they have built. When asked how they were selected for this job, Deidre shrugs. “They do good work, so I chose them.”
Deidre is a terrific employee with a strong track record. That’s why she’s been charged to deliver this rushed project. You’re sure she has the best interests of the company at heart, and you don’t doubt that she’s under pressure to meet a deadline that cannot be pushed back. However, you have concerns about the app’s handling of personal data and its security safeguards. Over lunch in the break room, you start to talk to her about it, but she quickly tries to reassure you, “I’m sure with your help we can fix any security issues if we have to, but I doubt there’ll be any. These people build apps for a living, and they know what they’re doing. You worry too much, but that’s why you’re so good at your job!”
What safeguard can most efficiently ensure that privacy protection is a dimension of relationships with vendors?
A. Include appropriate language about privacy protection in vendor contracts.
B. Perform a privacy audit on any vendor under consideration.
C. Require that a person trained in privacy protection be part of all vendor selection teams.
D. Do business only with vendors who are members of privacy trade associations.
Including appropriate language about privacy protection in vendor contracts.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Edufox has hosted an annual convention of users of its famous e-learning software platform, and over time, it has become a grand event. It fills one of the large downtown conference hotels and overflows into the others, with several thousand attendees enjoying three days of presentations, panel discussions and networking. The convention is the centerpiece of the company’s product rollout schedule and a great training opportunity for current users. The sales force also encourages prospective clients to attend to get a better sense of the ways in which the system can be customized to meet diverse needs and understand that when they buy into this system, they are joining a community that feels like family.
This year’s conference is only three weeks away, and you have just heard news of a new initiative supporting it: a smartphone app for attendees. The app will support late registration, highlight the featured presentations and provide a mobile version of the conference program. It also links to a restaurant reservation system with the best cuisine in the areas featured. “It’s going to be great,” the developer, Deidre Hoffman, tells you, “if, that is, we actually get it working!” She laughs nervously but explains that because of the tight time frame she’d been given to build the app, she outsourced the job to a local firm. “It’s just three young people,” she says, “but they do great work.” She describes some of the other apps they have built. When asked how they were selected for this job, Deidre shrugs. “They do good work, so I chose them.”
Deidre is a terrific employee with a strong track record. That’s why she’s been charged to deliver this rushed project. You’re sure she has the best interests of the company at heart, and you don’t doubt that she’s under pressure to meet a deadline that cannot be pushed back. However, you have concerns about the app’s handling of personal data and its security safeguards. Over lunch in the break room, you start to talk to her about it, but she quickly tries to reassure you, “I’m sure with your help we can fix any security issues if we have to, but I doubt there’ll be any. These people build apps for a living, and they know what they’re doing. You worry too much, but that’s why you’re so good at your job!”
You want to point out that normal protocols have NOT been followed in this matter. Which process in particular has been neglected?
Forensic inquiry.
Data mapping.
Privacy breach prevention.
Vendor due diligence vetting.
Vendor due diligence vetting
Edufox has hosted an annual convention of users of its famous e-learning software platform, and over time, it has become a grand event. It fills one of the large downtown conference hotels and overflows into the others, with several thousand attendees enjoying three days of presentations, panel discussions and networking. The convention is the centerpiece of the company’s product rollout schedule and a great training opportunity for current users. The sales force also encourages prospective clients to attend to get a better sense of the ways in which the system can be customized to meet diverse needs and understand that when they buy into this system, they are joining a community that feels like family.
This year’s conference is only three weeks away, and you have just heard news of a new initiative supporting it: a smartphone app for attendees. The app will support late registration, highlight the featured presentations and provide a mobile version of the conference program. It also links to a restaurant reservation system with the best cuisine in the areas featured. “It’s going to be great,” the developer, Deidre Hoffman, tells you, “if, that is, we actually get it working!” She laughs nervously but explains that because of the tight time frame she’d been given to build the app, she outsourced the job to a local firm. “It’s just three young people,” she says, “but they do great work.” She describes some of the other apps they have built. When asked how they were selected for this job, Deidre shrugs. “They do good work, so I chose them.”
Deidre is a terrific employee with a strong track record. That’s why she’s been charged to deliver this rushed project. You’re sure she has the best interests of the company at heart, and you don’t doubt that she’s under pressure to meet a deadline that cannot be pushed back. However, you have concerns about the app’s handling of personal data and its security safeguards. Over lunch in the break room, you start to talk to her about it, but she quickly tries to reassure you, “I’m sure with your help we can fix any security issues if we have to, but I doubt there’ll be any. These people build apps for a living, and they know what they’re doing. You worry too much, but that’s why you’re so good at your job!”
You see evidence that company employees routinely circumvent the privacy officer in developing new initiatives.
How can you best draw attention to the scope of this problem?
A. Insist upon one-on-one consultation with each person who works around the privacy officer.
B. Develop a metric showing the number of initiatives launched without consultation and include it in reports, presentations, and consultation.
C.Hold discussions with the department head of anyone who fails to consult with the privacy officer.
D. Take your concerns straight to the Chief Executive Officer.
develop a metric showing the number of initiatives launched without consultation and include it in reports, presentations, and consultations.
What is one obligation that the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) imposes on data processors?
A. To honor all data access requests from data subjects.
B. To inform data subjects about the identity and contact details of the controller.
C. To implement appropriate technical and organizational measures that ensure an appropriate level of security.
D. To carry out data protection impact assessments in cases where processing is likely to result in high risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals.
To implement appropriate technical and organizational measures that ensure an appropriate level of security.
An executive for a multinational online retail company in the United States is looking for guidance in developing her company’s privacy program beyond what is specifically required by law.
What would be the most effective resource for the executive to consult?
A. Internal auditors.
b. Industry frameworks.
c. Oversight organizations.
d. Breach notifications from competitors.
Industry frameworks
What is one reason the European Union has enacted more comprehensive privacy laws than the United States?
To ensure adequate enforcement of existing laws.
To ensure there is adequate funding for enforcement.
To allow separate industries to set privacy standards.
To allow the free movement of data between member countries.
To allow the free movement of data between member countries.
All of the following changes will likely trigger a data inventory update EXCEPT?
Outsourcing the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) function.
Acquisition of a new subsidiary.
Onboarding of a new vendor.
Passage of a new privacy regulation.
Passage of a new privacy regulation.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Paul Daniels, with years of experience as a CEO, is worried about his son Carlton’s successful venture, Gadgo. A technological innovator in the communication industry that quickly became profitable, Gadgo has moved beyond its startup phase. While it has retained its vibrant energy, Paul fears that under Carlton’s direction, the company may not be taking its risks or obligations as seriously as it needs to. Paul has hired you, a Privacy Consultant, to assess the company and report to both father and son. “Carlton won’t listen to me,” Paul says, “but he may pay attention to an expert.”
Gadgo’s workplace is a clubhouse for innovation, with games, toys, snacks. espresso machines, giant fish tanks and even an iguana who regards you with little interest. Carlton, too, seems bored as he describes to you the company’s procedures and technologies for data protection. It’s a loose assemblage of controls, lacking consistency and with plenty of weaknesses. “This is a technology company,” Carlton says. “We create. We innovate. I don’t want unnecessary measures that will only slow people down and clutter their thoughts.”
The meeting lasts until early evening. Upon leaving, you walk through the office it looks as if a strong windstorm has recently blown through, with papers scattered across desks and tables and even the floor. A “cleaning crew” of one teenager is emptying the trash bins. A few computers have been left on for the night, others are missing. Carlton takes note of your attention to this: “Most of my people take their laptops home with them, or use their own tablets or phones. I want them to use whatever helps them to think and be ready day or night for that great insight. It may only come once!”
What would be the best kind of audit to recommend for Gadgo?
A supplier audit.
An internal audit.
A third-party audit.
A self-certification.
third-party audit
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Paul Daniels, with years of experience as a CEO, is worried about his son Carlton’s successful venture, Gadgo. A technological innovator in the communication industry that quickly became profitable, Gadgo has moved beyond its startup phase. While it has retained its vibrant energy, Paul fears that under Carlton’s direction, the company may not be taking its risks or obligations as seriously as it needs to. Paul has hired you, a Privacy Consultant, to assess the company and report to both father and son. “Carlton won’t listen to me,” Paul says, “but he may pay attention to an expert.”
Gadgo’s workplace is a clubhouse for innovation, with games, toys, snacks. espresso machines, giant fish tanks and even an iguana who regards you with little interest. Carlton, too, seems bored as he describes to you the company’s procedures and technologies for data protection. It’s a loose assemblage of controls, lacking consistency and with plenty of weaknesses. “This is a technology company,” Carlton says. “We create. We innovate. I don’t want unnecessary measures that will only slow people down and clutter their thoughts.”
The meeting lasts until early evening. Upon leaving, you walk through the office it looks as if a strong windstorm has recently blown through, with papers scattered across desks and tables and even the floor. A “cleaning crew” of one teenager is emptying the trash bins. A few computers have been left on for the night, others are missing. Carlton takes note of your attention to this: “Most of my people take their laptops home with them, or use their own tablets or phones. I want them to use whatever helps them to think and be ready day or night for that great insight. It may only come once!”
What phase in the Privacy Maturity Model (PMM) does Gadgo’s privacy program best exhibit?
Ad hoc.
Defined.
Repeatable.
Managed.
Ad hoc. In the Ad hoc phase, privacy controls are often inconsistent, informal, and reactive, as is evident from the described state of Gadgo’s data protection practice
Incipia Corporation just trained the last of its 300 employees on their new privacy policies and procedures.
If Incipia wanted to analyze the effectiveness of the training over the next 6 months, which form of trend analysis should they use?
Cyclical.
Irregular.
Statistical.
Standard variance.
Statistical. Statistical trend analysis involves using data to identify patterns or trends over time. By collecting and analyzing data related to privacy compliance (such as incidents of non-compliance, employee feedback, or assessment scores), Incipia can evaluate how the training impacts behavior and identify areas for improvement.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Ben works in the IT department of IgNight, Inc., a company that designs lighting solutions for its clients. Although IgNight’s customer base consists primarily of offices in the US, some individuals have been so impressed by the unique aesthetic and energy-saving design of the light fixtures that they have requested IgNight’s installations in their homes across the globe.
One Sunday morning, while using his work laptop to purchase tickets for an upcoming music festival, Ben happens to notice some unusual user activity on company files. From a cursory review, all the data still appears to be where it is meant to be but he can’t shake off the feeling that something is not right. He knows that it is a possibility that this could be a colleague performing unscheduled maintenance, but he recalls an email from his company’s security team reminding employees to be on alert for attacks from a known group of malicious actors specifically targeting the industry.
Ben is a diligent employee and wants to make sure that he protects the company but he does not want to bother his hard-working colleagues on the weekend. He is going to discuss the matter with this manager first thing in the morning but wants to be prepared so he can demonstrate his knowledge in this area and plead his case for a promotion.
To determine the steps to follow, what would be the most appropriate internal guide for Ben to review?
Incident Response Plan.
Code of Business Conduct.
IT Systems and Operations Handbook.
Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan.
Incident Response Plan.
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Ben works in the IT department of IgNight, Inc., a company that designs lighting solutions for its clients. Although IgNight’s customer base consists primarily of offices in the US, some individuals have been so impressed by the unique aesthetic and energy-saving design of the light fixtures that they have requested IgNight’s installations in their homes across the globe.
One Sunday morning, while using his work laptop to purchase tickets for an upcoming music festival, Ben happens to notice some unusual user activity on company files. From a cursory review, all the data still appears to be where it is meant to be but he can’t shake off the feeling that something is not right. He knows that it is a possibility that this could be a colleague performing unscheduled maintenance, but he recalls an email from his company’s security team reminding employees to be on alert for attacks from a known group of malicious actors specifically targeting the industry.
Ben is a diligent employee and wants to make sure that he protects the company but he does not want to bother his hard-working colleagues on the weekend. He is going to discuss the matter with this manager first thing in the morning but wants to be prepared so he can demonstrate his knowledge in this area and plead his case for a promotion.
If this were a data breach, how is it likely to be categorized?
Availability Breach.
Authenticity Breach.
Confidentiality Breach.
Integrity Breach.
Confidentiality breach
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Ben works in the IT department of IgNight, Inc., a company that designs lighting solutions for its clients. Although IgNight’s customer base consists primarily of offices in the US, some individuals have been so impressed by the unique aesthetic and energy-saving design of the light fixtures that they have requested IgNight’s installations in their homes across the globe.
One Sunday morning, while using his work laptop to purchase tickets for an upcoming music festival, Ben happens to notice some unusual user activity on company files. From a cursory review, all the data still appears to be where it is meant to be but he can’t shake off the feeling that something is not right. He knows that it is a possibility that this could be a colleague performing unscheduled maintenance, but he recalls an email from his company’s security team reminding employees to be on alert for attacks from a known group of malicious actors specifically targeting the industry.
Ben is a diligent employee and wants to make sure that he protects the company but he does not want to bother his hard-working colleagues on the weekend. He is going to discuss the matter with this manager first thing in the morning but wants to be prepared so he can demonstrate his knowledge in this area and plead his case for a promotion.
Going forward, what is the best way for IgNight to prepare its IT team to manage these kind of security events?
Tabletop exercises.
Update its data inventory.
IT security awareness training.
Share communications relating to scheduled maintenance.
Tabletop exercises
These are simulated scenarios where team members work through potential security incidents in a controlled environment. Tabletop exercises help teams practice their response procedures, identify gaps in their plans, and improve coordination and decision-making during actual events. They are particularly useful for preparing teams to handle complex or unexpected security incidents.
Which of the following is NOT typically a function of a Privacy Officer?
A. Managing an organization’s information security infrastructure.
B. serving as an interdepartmental liaison for privacy concerns.
C. Monitoring an organization’s compliance with privacy laws.
D. Responding to information access requests from the public.
Managing an organization’s information security infrastructure.
What is the main reason to begin with 3-5 key metrics during the program development process?
To avoid undue financial costs.
To keep the focus on the main organizational objectives.
To minimize selective data use.
To keep the process limited to as few people as possible.
To keep the focus on the main organizational objectives.
What is the main purpose of a privacy program audit?
To mitigate the effects of a privacy breach.
To justify a privacy department budget increase.
To make decisions on privacy staff roles and responsibilities.
To ensure the adequacy of data protection procedures.
to ensure the adequacy of data protection procedures.
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), when would a data subject have the right to require the erasure of his or her data without undue delay?
When the data subject is a public authority.
When the erasure is in the public interest.
When the processing is carried out by automated means.
When the data is no longer necessary for its original purpose.
When the data is no longer necessary for its original purpose.
What is the key factor that lays the foundation for all other elements of a privacy program?
A. The applicable privacy regulations
B. The structure of a privacy team
C. A privacy mission statement
D. A responsible internal stakeholder
The applicable privacy regulations
Please use the following to answer the next question:
For 15 years, Albert has worked at Treasure Box – a mail order company in the United States (U.S.) that used to sell decorative candles around the world, but has recently decided to limit its shipments to customers in the 48 contiguous states. Despite his years of experience, Albert is often overlooked for managerial positions. His frustration about not being promoted, coupled with his recent interest in issues of privacy protection, have motivated Albert to be an agent of positive change.
He will soon interview for a newly advertised position, and during the interview, Albert plans on making executives aware of lapses in the company’s privacy program. He feels certain he will be rewarded with a promotion for preventing negative consequences resulting from the company’s outdated policies and procedures.
For example, Albert has learned about the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountans)/CICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) Privacy Maturity Model (PMM). Albert thinks the model is a useful way to measure Treasure Box’s ability to protect personal data. Albert has noticed that Treasure Box fails to meet the requirements of the highest level of maturity of this model; at his interview, Albert will pledge to assist the company with meeting this level in order to provide customers with the most rigorous security available.
Albert does want to show a positive outlook during his interview. He intends to praise the company’s commitment to the security of customer and employee personal data against external threats. However, Albert worries about the high turnover rate within the company, particularly in the area of direct phone marketing. He sees many unfamiliar faces every day who are hired to do the marketing, and he often hears complaints in the lunch room regarding long hours and low pay, as well as what seems to be flagrant disregard for company procedures.
In addition, Treasure Box has had two recent security incidents. The company has responded to the incidents with internal audits and updates to security safeguards. However, profits still seem to be affected and anecdotal evidence indicates that many people still harbor mistrust. Albert wants to help the company recover. He knows there is at least one incident the public in unaware of, although Albert does not know the details. He believes the company’s insistence on keeping the incident a secret could be a further detriment to its reputation. One further way that Albert wants to help Treasure Box regain its stature is by creating a toll-free number for customers, as well as a more efficient procedure for responding to customer concerns by postal mail.
In addition to his suggestions for improvement, Albert believes that his knowledge of the company’s recent business maneuvers will also impress the interviewers. For example, Albert is aware of the company’s intention to acquire a medical supply company in the coming weeks.
With his forward thinking, Albert hopes to convince the managers who will be interviewing him that he is right for the job.
In consideration of the company’s new initiatives, which of the following laws and regulations would be most appropriate for Albert to mention at the interview as a priority concern for the privacy team?
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
HIPAA
SCENARIO:
Please use the following to answer the next question:
For 15 years, Albert has worked at Treasure Box – a mail order company in the United States (U.S.) that used to sell decorative candles around the world, but has recently decided to limit its shipments to customers in the 48 contiguous states. Despite his years of experience, Albert is often overlooked for managerial positions. His frustration about not being promoted, coupled with his recent interest in issues of privacy protection, have motivated Albert to be an agent of positive change.
He will soon interview for a newly advertised position, and during the interview, Albert plans on making executives aware of lapses in the company’s privacy program. He feels certain he will be rewarded with a promotion for preventing negative consequences resulting from the company’s outdated policies and procedures.
For example, Albert has learned about the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountans)/CICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) Privacy Maturity Model (PMM). Albert thinks the model is a useful way to measure Treasure Box’s ability to protect personal data. Albert has noticed that Treasure Box fails to meet the requirements of the highest level of maturity of this model; at his interview, Albert will pledge to assist the company with meeting this level in order to provide customers with the most rigorous security available.
Albert does want to show a positive outlook during his interview. He intends to praise the company’s commitment to the security of customer and employee personal data against external threats. However, Albert worries about the high turnover rate within the company, particularly in the area of direct phone marketing. He sees many unfamiliar faces every day who are hired to do the marketing, and he often hears complaints in the lunch room regarding long hours and low pay, as well as what seems to be flagrant disregard for company procedures.
In addition, Treasure Box has had two recent security incidents. The company has responded to the incidents with internal audits and updates to security safeguards. However, profits still seem to be affected and anecdotal evidence indicates that many people still harbor mistrust. Albert wants to help the company recover. He knows there is at least one incident the public in unaware of, although Albert does not know the details. He believes the company’s insistence on keeping the incident a secret could be a further detriment to its reputation. One further way that Albert wants to help Treasure Box regain its stature is by creating a toll-free number for customers, as well as a more efficient procedure for responding to customer concerns by postal mail.
In addition to his suggestions for improvement, Albert believes that his knowledge of the company’s recent business maneuvers will also impress the interviewers. For example, Albert is aware of the company’s intention to acquire a medical supply company in the coming weeks.
With his forward thinking, Albert hopes to convince the managers who will be interviewing him that he is right for the job.
On which of the following topics does Albert most likely need additional knowledge?
The role of privacy in retail companies
The necessary maturity level of privacy programs
The possibility of delegating responsibilities related to privacy
The requirements for a managerial position with privacy protection duties
The requirements for a managerial position with privacy protection duties
Please use the following to answer the next question:
For 15 years, Albert has worked at Treasure Box – a mail order company in the United States (U.S.) that used to sell decorative candles around the world, but has recently decided to limit its shipments to customers in the 48 contiguous states. Despite his years of experience, Albert is often overlooked for managerial positions. His frustration about not being promoted, coupled with his recent interest in issues of privacy protection, have motivated Albert to be an agent of positive change.
He will soon interview for a newly advertised position, and during the interview, Albert plans on making executives aware of lapses in the company’s privacy program. He feels certain he will be rewarded with a promotion for preventing negative consequences resulting from the company’s outdated policies and procedures.
For example, Albert has learned about the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountans)/CICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) Privacy Maturity Model (PMM). Albert thinks the model is a useful way to measure Treasure Box’s ability to protect personal data. Albert has noticed that Treasure Box fails to meet the requirements of the highest level of maturity of this model; at his interview, Albert will pledge to assist the company with meeting this level in order to provide customers with the most rigorous security available.
Albert does want to show a positive outlook during his interview. He intends to praise the company’s commitment to the security of customer and employee personal data against external threats. However, Albert worries about the high turnover rate within the company, particularly in the area of direct phone marketing. He sees many unfamiliar faces every day who are hired to do the marketing, and he often hears complaints in the lunch room regarding long hours and low pay, as well as what seems to be flagrant disregard for company procedures.
In addition, Treasure Box has had two recent security incidents. The company has responded to the incidents with internal audits and updates to security safeguards. However, profits still seem to be affected and anecdotal evidence indicates that many people still harbor mistrust. Albert wants to help the company recover. He knows there is at least one incident the public in unaware of, although Albert does not know the details. He believes the company’s insistence on keeping the incident a secret could be a further detriment to its reputation. One further way that Albert wants to help Treasure Box regain its stature is by creating a toll-free number for customers, as well as a more efficient procedure for responding to customer concerns by postal mail.
In addition to his suggestions for improvement, Albert believes that his knowledge of the company’s recent business maneuvers will also impress the interviewers. For example, Albert is aware of the company’s intention to acquire a medical supply company in the coming weeks.
With his forward thinking, Albert hopes to convince the managers who will be interviewing him that he is right for the job.
Based on Albert’s observations, executive leadership should most likely pay closer attention to what?
Awareness campaigns with confusing information
Obsolete data processing systems
Outdated security frameworks
Potential in-house threats
Outdated security frameworks
