CILEX EXAM Flashcards
Define Negligence
The leading case for negligence can be established in Blyth V Birmingham Waterworks which assess the standard of care that an ordinary prudent person should exercised. It is based on the act or omission that the reasonable man would or would not do given they were in the same situation.
Identify two examples of common law duties of care?
Road Users to Road Users - Nettleship V Western
Manufacturer to End Consumer - Donoghue V Stevenson
What is meant by a primary victim?
As established in Page V Smith and Dihleu V White. A primary victim is someone who is within the danger zone and feared for ones own safety. They must show that it was reasonably foreseeable that someone would suffer sudden shock from the defendants negligent act.
Identify whether the court will take an objective or subjective approach when assessing the standard of care.
Objective approach.
Explain when a claimant’s own act can break the chain of causation.
A claimant’s own act can break the chain of causation which is also known as a new intervening act, this is where they have not tried to mitigate their loss or worsened their situation. As seen in Mckew V Holland, the claimant acted recklessly and the injury could have been prevented.
Identify the three requirements which must be established for an employer to be held vicariously liable.
1) a relationship of control
2) a tort has been committed
3) the act must be in course of employment
Explain the requirements to establish the defence of contributory negligence.
Essentially, the burden of proof reverses. A partial defence of contributory negligence may be available where the defendant can prove that the claimant has not taken reasonable care or tried to mitigate their loss.
The requirements are:
1) The claimant has failed to take proper steps to take care of their own safety
2) Failure to take care contributed towards their damage
This was established in FROOM V BUTCHER
What statue covers contributory negligence?
Law Reform Contributory act 1945
Explain the effect of s.65 Consumer Rights Act 2015.
A Trader can exclude liabilty for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.
Define general damages
Unquantifiable loss - None Pecuniary loss
The loss includes Pain and Suffering, Loss of amenity, loss of enjoyment. These will be calculated from the date of the trial. Also known as future expense. This loss will be estimated and will be paid in one lump sum.
Identify two statutory torts
Animals Act 1971
Consumers Right Act 1987
explain the approach suggested by the Supreme Court to ‘novel duty’ situations in Robinson v CC of W Yorkshire (2018).
1) Was the type of harm reasonable foreseeability of harm?
2) sufficient proximity, time and space, or relationship of the parties
3) Is it fair just and reasonable to impose liability?
Explain, in the context of claims for psychiatric injury, what is meant by the ‘floodgates argument’
Examples where courts recognise the ‘floodgates’ argument include claims for pure psychiatric harm and claims against public bodies such as the police. They fear if they were to impose liabilty that it could lead to fraudulent claims and deter positive behaviour. This can be seen in Hill V West Cheif Constable.
Which two cases relates to imposing liabilty on a public body?
L V Reading Borough Council and Hill V Cheif Constable,
Identify the basic standard of care expected of those who owe a duty of care
The basic standard of care can be seen in Blyth V Birmingham Waterworks. This established the reasonable mans test. It is based on the ordinary prudent person. The Act or omission that a reasonable person would or would not do given they were in the same situation.
Explain what is meant by the ‘but for’ test.
The ‘but for’ test is based on Causation of Fact. The was established in Barnet V Kensington Hospital.
But for the negligent act of the defendant, would like claimaint or party at loss still have suffered the injury or loss in question? If yes, the defendant will not be held liable. If no, the defendant will be held liable.
This is based on the balance of probabilities. ‘More probable that not’
Explain what is meant by the ‘eggshell skull rule’.
The egg shell rule was defined in smith V leech. Essentially, you take your victim as you find them. You can not use the persons vulnerability to escape liabilty.
Identify and explain the test used when the court must decide whether an intentional wrong took place within the course of employment
Control test,
Organisation test,
and Sufficient relationship test.
Identify the standard limitation period for a claim in personal injury
3 years
Identify the standard limitation period for a tort claim.
6 years
Identify the standard limitation period for a defamation claim
1 year
Identify one statute which may affect the calculation of damages in a claim where the claimant has died as a result of the negligence alleged.
Law Reform Contributory negligence act 1945
the ‘three stage test’ for establishing a novel duty of care;
1) Foreseeability of Harm
2) sufficient proximity
3) fair just and reasonable to impose liabilty
what is the three stages to establish breach of duty of care
1) Duty of Care
2) Breach of Duty
3) Causation
