CIK Questions Flashcards
Your prompt initial action at a serious crime scene has led to the apprehension of a male nearby who is acting suspiciously. During a preliminary interview with him you should: Choose 2.
a) Make a notebook entry of his details and his demeanour.
b) Get him to draw a sketch to aid your scene reconstruction.
c) Give him his rights and gather sufficient information to details.
OR
d) arrest him and transport him to the Police Station
e) ask him to show you where he has been in the crime scene
f) consider conducting a preliminary interview
a) Make a notebook entry of his details and his demeanour.
and/or
f) consider conducting a preliminary interview
If a suspect’s right to ‘consult and instruct a lawyer without delay and in private’ cannot be facilitated immediately by Police, what action is required first?
a) Arrange for their lawyer to attend at a time suiting the circumstances
b) Advise the suspect of that fact and proceed to interview
c) Advise the suspect of that fact and the reason for the delay
c) Advise the suspect of that fact and the reason for the delay
Which of the following behaviours demonstrated by a lawyer at interview would be unacceptable?
a) Challenging the interviewer on the validity of the allegations made
b) Challenging a question put to their client that they believe to be improper
c) Challenging the manner in which a question is put to their client
a) Challenging the interviewer on the validity of the allegations made.
You have arrested an adult male and want to interview him further. Which of the following statements is most correct?
a) You can interview him while being mindful of the need to proceed to court as soon as possible
b) You can interview him at length to gather any evidence with which to progress the charge against him
c) You can interview him for a short time only as he must be fairly and reasonably treated while in custody
a) You can interview him while being mindful of the need to proceed to court as soon as possible.
After charging a shoplifter with theft and lodging her in the cells, you receive information leading you to suspect her of further thefts. According to Chief Justice Practice Note Guideline 2 you should:
a) Reconvene the interview, caution her and ask questions relating to both offences
b) Interview her again on video, caution again and question her about the new allegations
c) Reconvene the interview, question her further about all the stolen items
b) Interview her again on video, caution again and question her about the new allegations
When a witness signs the declaration on a witness statement the interviewer must ensure the witness understands they are agreeing that - To the best of their knowledge and belief their statement is true and:
a) They have read over what is written, agree they have been fairly treated but have nothing more to add
b) They know how the statement may be used and the consequences of giving false or misleading information
c) They have been told how their statement will be used and are prepared to give evidence in court if required
b) They know how the statement may be used and the consequences of giving false or misleading information
In relation to cross examination which of the following answers is correct?
a) Where it is obvious that a person is lying, repetitive questions will elicit the truth
b) Questions aimed at establishing further facts from answers give are acceptable
c) Police may use any means of questioning to elicit the truth from an offender
b) Questions aimed at establishing further facts from answers give are acceptable
When planning an interview with a special consideration witness (vulnerable) witness the investigator should:
a) Consult a supervisor to make decisions about the interview
b) Conduct the interview promptly to avoid memory loss
c) Prepare to use Conversation Management to maximise the witness account
a) Consult a supervisor to make decisions about the interview
Representation refers to the behaviour of the interviewer who:
a) Promises a favour in return for a requested action
b) Does not advise the suspect of the right to a lawyer
c) Allows the suspect to have a support person in the interview
a) Promises a favour in return for a requested action
The ‘truth may be elusive, so you may need to be persistent’. In this statement ‘persistent’ refers to interviewer behaviour and means.
a) Asking questions for as long as it takes to get a full and truthful account from the suspect. ?????
b) Asking a question in many different ways so that any lies told will become more apparent.
c) Asking questions in a manner that will stand up to the scrutiny of the court.
Asking questions in a manner that will stand up to the scrutiny of the court
You are interviewing an offender arrested for ‘receiving’. While attempting to establish the identity of the original thief the offender begins to tell conflicting accounts. You now decide to change interview styles and being to very strongly put questions to him demanding explanations and answers to your questions. He eventually gives the identity of the thief and other evidence against himself. Would the above evidence by your offender be admissible in Court?
a) No, because the offender was in custody and questions must not amount to cross-examination.
b) Yes, because demanding answers to questions and using your personality.
c) No, once a person has been arrested for an offence they cannot be interviewed about the original offence.
a) No, because the offender was in custody and questions must not amount to cross-examination.
When explaining the caution to an adult suspect who suffers from an intellectual disability you should give them their rights and:
a) Ask them to repeat the caution so you can check their understanding
b) Ask their support person to repeat the caution to confirm the suspect understands
c) Ask them to tell you in their own words what the caution means to them
c) Ask them to tell you in their own words what the caution means to them
According to Criminal Justice Practice Note Guideline 4, when you are questioning a suspect about statements made by a witness you should:
a) Explain the substance or nature of the witness statements to them
b) Tell the suspect you have a witness statement that incriminates them
c) Read the entire witness’s statement word for word to the suspect
a) Explain the substance or nature of the witness statements to them
When a DVD of an adult witness interview is to be used as evidence-in-chief then the O/C case must ensure:
a) All matters that may be the subject of cross-examination are covered in the video
b) A support person was present in the interview room during the interview
c) The witness has viewed the video and given their signed consent for it to be used
c) The witness has viewed the video and given their signed consent for it to be used
When conducting a suspect interview at the police station you are informed that a lawyer has arrived saying she is to act for the suspect and asking to see him. The suspect has given you no indication that he wishes to speak to a lawyer. What action should you take?
a) Ask the suspect if he wants a lawyer, and if not, advise the lawyer of that fact
b) Ensure the lawyer is told the suspect has not asked for a lawyer and continue
c) Tell the suspect the lawyer is at the station to see him and act on the suspect’s wishes
c) Tell the suspect the lawyer is at the station to see him and act on the suspect’s wishes
Immediately before you ask a suspect to give their account of the events in question, you should explain:
a) The evidence you have and its significance for the suspect.
b) The events leading to the suspect agreeing to be interviewed.
c) What will happen with the video record after the interview.
b) The events leading to the suspect agreeing to be interviewed.
When should an investigator visually record a witness interview?
a) Whenever an interviewing suite and required resources are available.
b) Whenever the witness is identified as a special consideration witness.
c) When the interview is needed for completeness and accuracy of evidence.
a) Whenever an interviewing suite and required resources are available.
When a witness has provided a description that matches the suspect, the best way to present this as a challenge during the suspect interview is to say:
a) “We have evidence from witnesses that you were at the scene”
b) “A witness has identified you as the person who committed the offence”
c) “A witnesses has provided details of an offender that fits your description”.
c) “A witness has provided details of an offender that fits your description”.
You and a colleague are separately interviewing two suspects at the station. Your suspect is uncooperative so you leave the room, return five minutes later and tell him that his friend has admitted taking part in the burglary. He shrugs, readily admits his involvement and later pleads guilty. Would the above admission by your suspect be admissible in Court?
a) No, because your suspect was not given a written statement from the other suspect.
b) No because the admission was obtained by misrepresenting the truth to your suspect.
c) Yes, because there was no duress and the suspect freely made the admission of guilt.
b) No because the admission was obtained by misrepresenting the truth to your suspect.
Which of the following statements about the Free Recall (FR) model is generally true? When using the FR model the interviewer:
a) Does not explain the ground rules
b) Does not include a challenge phase
c) Does not ask probing questions
b) Does not include a challenge phase
According to the investigative interviewing doctrine which of the following statements about probing questions is correct.
a) An interviewer must follow a witness account with probing questions.
b) An interviewer should initiate a suspect account with a probing question.
c) An interviewer should avoid asking probing questions beginning with why.
c) An interviewer should avoid asking probing questions beginning with why.
An appropriate support person for a special consideration adult witness should be present in the room during interview when the interviewer:
a) Requires the support person to interpret
b) Decides it is in the interest of the witness.
c) Decides it is in their own interests.
b) Decides it is in the interest of the witness.
After witnessing an assault you approach and arrest the offender. He refuses to say anything to you. 30 minutes later at the station the offender states that he wishes to speak to you about the incident. When interviewed he tells you why the assault took place. At what point during this incident should this offender have received the Rights/Caution/.
a) At the time the offender was arrested for assaulting the other person, and prior to any interview when he was in custody.
b) At this time of arrest only because once an offender is arrested the Rights/Caution lasts for the next two hours.
c) At the start of the interview while he was in custody and upon the offender eventually admitting the assault.
a) At the time the offender was arrested for assaulting the other person, and prior to any interview when he was in custody.
Should a person who is intoxicated at interview be treated as a special consideration witness?
a) Yes because their ability to give accurate information is affected.
b) No because alcohol only temporarily impairs their ability to talk.
c) Yes because they will not fully understand the reason for the interview.
c) Yes because they will not fully understand the reason for the interview.