CIB012 Arson (no hints) Flashcards
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for the offence of
- Arson (danger to life)
Section 267(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961, 14 years imprisonment
- Intentionally (OR) Recklessly
- Damages by fire (OR) damages by means of any explosive
- Any property
- If he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue.
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for the offence of
- Arson (immovable property)
Section 267(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961, 14 years imprisonment
- Intentionally (OR) recklessly
- And without claim of right
- Damages by fire (OR) damages by means of any explosive
- Any immovable property (or any vehicle, ship or aircraft)
- In which that person has no interest.
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for the offence of
- Arson (obtain benefit or cause loss)
Section 267(1)(c) - Crimes Act 1961 - 14 years imprisonment
- Intentionally
- Damages by fire (OR) damages by means of any explosive
- Any immovable property (or any vehicle, ship or aircraft)
- With intent to obtain any benefit, or to cause loss to any other person.
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for the offence of
- Attempted Arson
Section 268, Crimes Act 1961
10 years imprisonment
- Every one who
- Attempts to commit arson
- In respect of any immovable property or any vehicle, ship, or aircraft.
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for the offence of
- Arson (no interest - other than property referred to in ss1)
Section 267(2)(a), Crimes Act 1961, 7 years imprisonment
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- And without claim of right
- Damages by fire OR damages by means of any explosive
- Any property
- In which that person has no interest (other than property referred to in ss1)
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for other than property referred to in ss(1)
- Arson (obtain benefit) OR (cause loss)
Section 267(2)(b), Crimes Act 1961, 7 years imprisonment
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- Damages by fire OR by means of any explosive
- Any property (other than property referred to in ss(1))
- With intent to obtain any benefit OR with intent to cause loss to any other person.
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for
- Arson with reckless disregard for the safety of other property
Section 267(3), Crimes Act 1961, 5 years imprisonment
- Intentionally
- Damages by fire OR by damages by means of any explosive
- Any property
- With reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for
- Intentional damage - danger to life
Section 269(1), Crimes Act 1961, 10 years imprisonment
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- If he or she knows, or ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for
- Intentional damage - no interest
Section 269(2)(a), Crimes Act 1961, 7 years imprionment.
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- And without claim of right
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- In which that person has no interest
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for
- Intentional damage - obtain benefit or cause loss
Section 269(2)(b), Crimes Act 1961, 7 years imprisonment
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- Without claim of right
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- With intent to obtain any benefit OR to cause loss to any other person
Give the act, section, penalty and elements for
- Intentional damage - reckless disregard
Section 269(3), Crimes Act 1961, 7 years imprisonment
- Intentionally
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- With reckless disregard for the safety of other property
Define the term property
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest.
Only tangible property is capable of being damaged by fire or explosive
An element of 267(1) is that the defendant knowingly puts a person’s life at risk
What is the definition of ‘knowing’?
What two tests should be proven?
Simester and Brookbanks suggest ‘knowing’ means: “knowing or correctly believing. The defendant may believe something wrongly, but cannot ‘know’ something that is false.”
This provision involves a subjective / objective test in relation to the defendant’s degree of knowledge
The subjective test: - what was the defendant thinking at the time? Did the defendant know that human life was likely to be endangered by his actions?
If there is insufficient evidence that the defendant was conscious of the risk, the next question is:
The objective test: - what would a reasonable person have thought in the circumstances? Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?
Define claim of right
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
A belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
Define vehicle
Section 2, LTA 1998
(a) means a contrivance equipped with wheels, tracks or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved
(b) includes a hovercraft, skateboard, skates
Define ship
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
Ship means every description of vessel used in navigation, however propelled; and includes any barge, lighter, dinghy, raft or like vessel.
Define aircraft
Section 2, Civil Aviation Act 1990
Any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from reactions of the air otherwise than by the reactions of the air against the surface of the earth.
Define interest
“Interest” in property is not defined by legislation, however the courts have held that tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it.
What is the definition of ‘danger to life’?
“Life” in this context means human life, and the danger must be to the life of someone other than the defendant.
Outline the circumstances and findings of the key case law in regards to INTEREST in property.
In R v Wilson, the defendant was attempting to manufacture methamphetamine at his rented property. The clan lab ignited and the house burned down. In addition to drugs charges, Wilson was charged with recklessly damaging the house by fire under s267(1)(b).
The Court of Appeal ruled that he could not be convicted of arson as his tenancy of property was an interest in that property and therefore provided him with a defence.
Outline the legislative definition of Attempts
Section 72(1), Crimes Act 1961
Attempts:
Everyone who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.
Legally you are allowed to set fire to or damage your own property, however, there are exceptions to the general rule. What are these exceptions?
- You intend to cause loss to someone else as a result of the fire
- You know or ought to know that the fire will endanger life
- You know that the fire is likely to destroy or damage someone else’s property as a consequence
Define benefit
Section 267(4), Crimes Act 1961 Any property, privilege, service, benefit, pecuniary advantage, or valuable consideration.
In the context of arson, this includes damage to the defendant’s own property if it was done with the intention of incurring a benefit
Define person
Gender neutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.
Define pecuniary advantage
“Pecuniary advantage” means anything that improves the defendant’s financial position.
Define person
Gender neutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
The legislation provides a wide definition of person to include not only real people, but also companies, public bodies, authorities and other organisations ; i.e. Police organisation is a ‘person’ under this wider definition
Define loss
Loss is not defined by statute; in most cases it will involve financial detriment to the victim.
The relevant case law is R v Morley:
‘Loss … is assessed by the extent to which the complainant’s position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired.’
R v Morley
Loss … is assessed by the extent to which the complainant’s position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired.
What intent must be proven in attempts to commit arson?
The crown must prove that the defendant intended to commit the full act of arson, and acted for the purposes of achieving that aim.
To be guilty of an attempt to commit an offence, what two things must a person do?
The Crown must prove that the defendant:
- INTENDED to commit the full offence, and
- Took a REAL & SUBSTANTIAL STEP to achieving their aim
Section 42(2)(a-f), Fire and Emergency New Zealand Act 2017 infers powers to the person in charge of the Fire Service at a fire.
What are those powers?
The right to:
(a) enter any land, building, or structure
(b) break into any building or structure that may be on fire or otherwise endangered or that is near the emergency
(c) take or send any equipment or machine required to be used into, through, or upon any land, building, or structure
(d) remove from any land, building, or structure that is on fire or otherwise endangered, or that is near the emergency, any flammable, combustible, explosive, or dangerous material found in the building or structure
(e) cause any building or structure that is on fire or otherwise endangered, or that is adjacent to or in the vicinity of any building or structure that is on fire or otherwise endangered, to be pulled down or shored up (either in whole or in part)
(f) cause any building or structure to be pulled down or shored up (either in whole or in part) at the time of the emergency or within a reasonable time afterwards.
R v Wilson
Tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it.
Application: interest in property
List five common methods of setting fires.
- Candles
- Chemical igniters
- Molotov cocktails
- Matches and cigarettes
- Readily combustible material (rubbish)
The Fire Service Special Investigator will liaise with the designated Police Fire Investigation Liaison Officer or other members of Police in relation to four specific matters. What are they?
- Handover of the fire scene
- Access to the fire scene
- Process for examination and investigation
- Identification and collection of evidence at the fire scene.
R v Harpur
’‘(The Court may) have regard to (the defendant’s) conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point where the conduct in question stops …. the defendant’s conduct (may) be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done … is always relevant, though not determinative’.
List seven signs that an accelerant may have been used
- Containers
- Unusually rapid spread or intensity of fire
- Traces in debris
- Smell
- Burning under or behind boards where the liquid has run through the cracks
- Uneven burning
- Multiple seats of fire
What are you aiming to find out when conducting a preliminary interview of an owner or occupier of a premises?
- When the premises were last secured, and by whom
- Whether he or she knows the cause of the fire
- Actions leading up to the fire
- Type of business
- The details of any suspects and any insurance