CIA 1.1: Applicable Guidance Flashcards
What are the Purposes of the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (“the Standards”)?
- Guide adherence with the mandatory elements of the IPPF.
- Provide a framework for performing and promoting a broad range of value-added internal audit activities.
- Establish the basis for evaluating internal auditing performance.
- Foster improved organizational processes and operations.
How does IIA define the mission of internal audit?
- “To enhance and protect organizational value by providing risk-based and objective assurance, advice, and insight.”
- Facilitating the achievement of this mission is the IPPF.
What kind of guidance does IPPF contain?
Mandatory and recommended guidance
What are the four elements of Mandatory guidance?
- The definition of Internal Audit
- The code of ethics
- The standards
- Core principles
What are the core principles in the IPPF?
The Core Principles are the basis for internal audit effectiveness. The internal audit function is effective if all principles are present and operating effectively. The
following are the Core Principles:
a. “Demonstrates integrity.
b. Demonstrates competence and due professional care.
c. Is objective and free from undue influence (independent).
d. Aligns with the strategies, objectives, and risks of the organization.
e. Is appropriately positioned and adequately resourced.
f. Demonstrates quality and continuous improvement.
g. Communicates effectively.
h. Provides risk-based assurance.
i. Is insightful, proactive, and future-focused.
j. Promotes organizational improvement.”
What is the definition of Internal Audit?
“Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.”
What purpose do the standards serve?
a. “Guide adherence with the mandatory elements of the International Professional Practices Framework.
b. Provide a framework for performing and promoting a broad range of value-added internal auditing services.
c. Establish the basis for the evaluation of internal audit performance.
d. Foster improved organizational processes and operations.”
What are attribute standards in the framework?
Attribute Standards govern the responsibilities, attitudes, and actions of the organization’s internal audit activity and the people who serve as internal auditors. They appear in boxes with green highlighting (example below) throughout this text.
Attribute Standard 1000
Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility
The purpose, authority, and responsibility of the internal audit activity must be formally defined in an internal audit charter, consistent with the Mission of Internal Audit and the mandatory elements of the International Professional Practices Framework (the Core Principles for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, the Standards, and the Definition of Internal Auditing). The chief audit executive must periodically review the internal audit charter and present it to senior management and the board for approval.
What are performance standards in the framework?
Performance Standards, numbered in the 2000s, govern the nature of internal auditing and provide quality criteria for evaluating the internal audit function’s performance. Performance Standards also appear in boxes with green highlighting (example below).
Performance Standard 2120
Risk Management
The internal audit activity must evaluate the effectiveness and contribute to the improvement of risk management processes.
What is interpretation of standard in the framework?
Interpretations are provided by The IIA to clarify terms and concepts referred to in Attribute or Performance Standards. Interpretations appear in boxes with blue highlighting (example below) throughout this text.
Interpretation of Standard 1000
The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity’s purpose, authority, and responsibility. The internal audit charter establishes the internal audit activity’s position within the organization, including the nature of the chief audit executive’s functional reporting relationship with the board; authorizes access to records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements; and defines the scope of internal audit activities. Final approval of the internal audit charter resides with the board.
What are implementation standards in the framework?
Implementation Standards expand upon the individual Attribute or Performance Standards by providing the requirements applicable to assurance (.A) or consulting (.C) services. Implementation Standards appear in boxes with gray highlighting (example below) throughout this text.
Implementation Standard 1110.A1
The internal audit activity must be free from interference in determining the scope of internal auditing, performing work, and communicating results. The chief audit executive must disclose such interference to the board and discuss the implications.
What is encompassed in the Code of Ethics and Standards?
The Core Principles and the Definition of Internal Auditing are encompassed in the Code of Ethics and the Standards. Thus, conformance with the Code and the Standards demonstrates conformance with all mandatory elements of the IPPF.
What are the elements of recommended guidance?
The pronouncements that constitute recommended guidance have been developed by The IIA through a formal approval process. They describe practices for effective implementation of the Core Principles, the Definition of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, and the Standards.
The two recommended elements of the IPPF are
- Implementation Guidance (IG) and
- Supplemental Guidance.
What do assurance services involve?
Per the Standards, assurance services involve the internal auditor’s objective assessment of evidence to provide opinions or conclusions regarding an entity, operation, function, process, system, or other subject matters. Accordingly, The IIA Glossary defines assurance services as an objective examination of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment on governance, risk management, and control processes for the organization.
Who determines the nature of scope of an assurance engagement?
The nature and scope of an assurance engagement are determined by the internal auditor.