CHP 10 Flashcards
what is another term used to describe probative evidence, or evidence that proves or helps tp prove that defendants committed the crimes with which they are charged
good evidence
the exclusionary rule bans illegally obtained evidence from what part of a criminal trial
the case in chief
initially the exclusionary rule only applied to which of the following
the federal law enforcement officers
what exception allows the use of illegally obtained evidence in nontrial proceedings
the collateral use exception
how often does evidence seized illegally result in dismissals in criminal trials
rarely
justification of the exclusionary rule is based on which of the following
constitutional rights, deterring officers from breaking laws and preservation of judicial integrity
in what case did SCOTUS hold that failure to comply with the knock and announce rule never violates the exclusionary rule if officers have a valid warrant to search a home
hudson v michigan
the exclusionary rule applies to all of the following except
cross-examination of the defendant
which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial, if the poisonous connection between the illegal police actions and the evidence weakend sufficiently
the attenuation exception
which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial if the officials law breaking behavior did not cause the seizure of the evidence?
the independent source exception
which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial, if the officials would have the evidence anyway
the inevitable exception
the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine refers to
the expansion of the exclusionary rule to ban evidence indirectly based on illegal government activity
SCOTUS has ruled that the exclusionary rule does not apply:
to collateral proceedings
in what case that reversed wolf v colorado and made the states follow the exclusionary rule was
Mapp v Ohio
what justification stems from the ancient legal saying “there is no right without a remedy”
constitutional right