Choice of Law Flashcards
When does a choice of law issue arise?
(1) The lawsuit involves factual connections with multiple states, and
(2) the multiple states have different laws leading to different results.
What is the general rule for what state’s law will govern in a choice of law problem in state court?
The governing law will be the law selected by the forum state according to its choice of law rules, assuming no applicable constitutional or statutory restrictions.
What is the general rule for what state’s law governs in a diversity case in federal court?
In a diversity case, the federal court will apply the choice of law approach of the state in which it sits. If the diversity case is transferred, the transferee federal court applies the choice of law approach of the transferor court.
What are the two kinds of limitations on a court’s power to apply a given law?
(1) Constitutional
(2) Statutory
What is the potential Constitutional limitation on a forum court’s choice of law?
The Constitution places very limited restrictions on a state court’s choice of law determinations. The due process clause dictates that a forum state may apply its own law only where it has sufficiently significant and substantial contact with the parties and transaction in question. The full faith and credit clause also occasionally dictates that the court give full faith and credit to a foreign state’s substantive law (in addition to their court judgments).
On the bar exam, when dealing with due process or full faith and credit limitations on state choice of law, what should you conclude?
Generally speaking, if the forum state has any significant contacts with the parties or subject matter of the action whereby it has a legitimate interest in regulating the outcome of the litigation, it is not Constitutionally bound to apply the foreign state’s law. Only when the forum state has no contact at all with the parties or the subject matter of the dispute would it be required to apply a foreign state’s conflicting law by reason of either the Due Process Clause or the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution.
What statutory restrictions might limit a state’s choice of law approach?
Some states have statutes directing a choice of law. If such a statute exists, the court should apply that.
What are the three possible choice of law approaches a state might apply?
(1) the vested rights approach (the 1st Restatement approach)
(2) interest analysis
(3) the most significant relationship approach (the 2nd Restatement approach)
What is the vested rights approach generally?
From the 1st Restatement. The operative law will be the that of the state in which the parties’ rights vested. Under this approach the court will apply the law of that state mandated by the applicable vesting rule for the relevant substantive area of law.
What is the analytical process applied in the vested rights approach?
(1) Categorize the substantive area of law
(2) Apply the right vesting rule based on the area of law
(3) Localize the rule to be applied
How does a forum state characterize an area of law for purposes of vested rights analysis?
(1) first determine whether it is substantive or procedural (the forum should apply its own procedural law!)
(2) then, use its own law to characterize the law at issue as, e.g., torts or contracts
What is the interest analysis approach generally?
Under this approach the court will consider which states have a legitimate interest in the outcome of the forum. The forum court will apply its own law as long as it has legitimate interest. if the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state.
Start with the assumption that the forum applies its own law and ask whether it has an interest in the litigation. If it doesn’t then it is a false conflict and the law of the interest forum applies. If the forum has a legitimate interest, then the forum state’s law is applied
What is the analytical process for the interest analysis approach?
(1) Discuss which states have legitimate interests
(2) Characterize the type of conflict as either a false conflict (only one state has a legitimate interest) or a true conflict (2+ states have a legitimate interest)
(3) Choose the governing law accordingly. If only one state has a legitimate interest, apply that state’s law. If the forum state has a legitimate interest, apply the forum state’s law.
(4) Apply the governing law to determine the result.
What is the most significant relationship approach?
Under this approach the court will apply the law of the state which is most significantly related to the outcome of the litigation. To determine this, the court will consider connecting facts (where) and policy principles (why).
Consider the connecting facts in a given case and whether the following policy principles should be considered: (1) The needs of interstate/international systems (2) Relevant policies and interests of the forum (3) The policies and interests of other jurisdictions (4) Are there justifiable expectations of the parties involved (5) the policies underlying the substantive area (6) uniformity of result
What is the analytical process for the most significant relationship approach (2d Restatement)?
(1) Discuss connecting facts
(2) Discuss policy principles
(3) Choose governing law based on the most significant relationship
(4) Apply the governing law
Is choice of law analysis applied on a claim by claim or issue by issue basis?
Claim by claim under the first restatement (vesting), but issues may be analyzed separately under the other two approaches.
In the substantive area of torts, how is the first restatement vesting rule applied?
The governing law is the law where the injury occurred.
In the substantive area of torts, how is the second restatement most significant relationship analysis applied?
For factual connection analysis, look to the place of injury, the place of the conduct causing the injury, the place where the parties are at home, and the place where the parties’ relationship is centered.
For policy analysis, look at the relevant policies of the forum state and of other connected states.
In the substantive area of torts, how is the interest analysis approach applied?
the same across all substantive areas
The governing law in torts is virtually always the law of the place of injury. One notable exception arises where?
Where the rule at issue is a loss distribution rule (as opposed to a conduct regulation rule) and the parties in the case share a common domicile. Examples of these rules include damage caps, vicarious liability, and immunity rules.
When the law in question is a speed limit, what law is applied?
The law of the place of conduct regardless of the analytical approach used?
Under interest analysis, how are interests in laws regarding damages interpreted?
The state of the plaintiff’s domicile has a legitimate interest in having its law applied
Under the 2d Restatement’s most significant relationship approach, how are rules regarding contribution among joint tortfeasors analyzed?
The usual rule about most significant relationships applies, but if both tortfeasors are domiciled in the same state, this might be the most significantly related state, especially if there is a special relationship between them
In a wrongful death, what is the place where the wrong occurred?
The place of injury leading to death, not the place of death
What happens if the tort injury occurs in multiple states?
Majority rule the law of plaintiff’s domicile applies, assuming the injury also occurred there