Choice of Law Flashcards
When a court hears a case that involves parties from or activities in more than one state, it must decide which state’s law to apply. To make that decision, it generally applies what?
the state’s choice of law doctrine.
What are the three prevailing choice of law doctrines?
the vested rights approach; the interest analysis approach; and the most significant relationship approach.
The vest rights approach is also referred to as the . . .
territorial approach
Under the vested rights approach, what law applies?
the law of the place where the parties’ rights vested; i.e. where the last event occurred that was necessary to create a cause of action.
What law applies in a vested rights jurisdiction where a torts action is being brought?
the law of the place where the injury occurred.
What law applies in a vested rights jurisdiction where a contracts action is being brought?
the law of the place where the contract was made or was to be performed.
What law applies in a vested rights jurisdiction where a procedural action is being brought?
the law of the state where the action is brought; i.e. the forum.
Where a case could be characterized as both a torts and a contracts case, or a torts and procedure case, what result?
you should apply both tests. The court may manipulate the case to get its desired outcome.
Under the interest analysis approach, courts will look to . . .
the laws and policies of the interested states to determine which law should apply.
In an interest analysis jurisdiction, what law is presumed to be applied?
the law of the forum, but if a party requests, an interest analysis of all interested states will be performed.
In an interest analysis jurisdiction, where the laws of two or more states conflict, but the underlying policies do not, what law will be applied?
the law of the only interested state.
In an interest analysis jurisdiction, where the laws and policies of two or more states conflict, what law is applied?
the law of the forum.
In an interest analysis jurisdiction, where neither the law nor the policies of two or more states conflict, what law is applied?
the law of the forum.
Under the most significant relationship approach, what law is applied?
the law of the state which has the most significant relationship to the occurrence or transaction and the parties.
In a most significant relationship jurisdiction, what is taken into consideration in determining which state has the most significant relationship to a transaction or occurrence?
1) relevant policies of the forum; 2) relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states in the determination of the particular issue; 3) the protection of justified expectations; 4) certainty, predictability, and uniformity of result; and 5) the ease of determining and applying the law chosen.
In a most significant relationship jurisdiction where a tort case is being brought, what should be considered in determining the states whose policies should be considered?
place of injury, place of conduct, parties’ domiciles, residence, place of incorporation, place of business, place where parties’ relationship is centered.
In a most significant relationship jurisdiction where a contracts case is being brought, what should be considered in determining the states whose policies should be considered?
the place of contracting, negotiation, performance or subject matter of the contract; place of parties’ domicile, residence, place of incorporation.
In a diversity case in a federal district court, you should apply the choice of law doctrine of what state?
the law where the federal court is sitting.
In a case transferred to federal court from a state court, whose choice of law rules are applied?
the choice of law rules of the transferring jurisdiction.
The most significant relationship approach is also referred to as what?
the Second Restatement Approach, since it is the approach espoused by the Second Restatement of Conflicts of Law.
Where a tort case is regarding laws that regulate conduct, what law is applied?
the law of the place of the wrong.