Choice of Law Flashcards
When a Choice of Law Question Arises
When (1) the lawsuit involves factual connections with multiple states and (2) the multiples states have different laws leading to different results
Which State’s Law Governs
The governing law is the law selected by the forum court according to its choice of law approach (assuming no applicable statutory or constitutional restrictions), UNLESS it’s a diversity case in federal court (then that state applies) or a transfer diversity case (then transferor court applies)
Restrictions that Sometimes Occasionally Limit the Forum Court’s Choice of Law
Constitutional DPC (constitution imposes a limit only if a state’s law is chosen that has NO significant contact with and/or legitimate interest in the litigation; Statutory (if forum state has a statute that directs a choice of law, then the forum court should apply that statute instead of the usual choice of law approach – e.g., borrowing statute)
Structure of a Choice of Law Answer
(1) Describe choice of law; (2) Describe choice of law approach (vested, interest, most significant relationship); (3) Apply choice of law approach (including governing law and result)
Choice of Law Approach 1: Vested Rights (1st Restatement)
Under this approach the court will apply the law of that state mandated by the applicable vesting rule, which is selected according to the relevant substantive area of law
Application of Vested Rights Approach
(1) Categorize substantive area of law; (2) State the applicable vesting rule; (3) Apply the vesting rule to determine the law; (4) Apply the governing law to determine the result
Choice of Law Approach 2: Interest Analysis
Under this approach, the court will consider which states have a legitimate interest in the outcome of the litigation. The forum court will apply its own law as long as it has a legitimate interest; if the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state
Application of the Interest Analysis
(1) Discuss which states have legit interests; (2) Characterize whether it’s a false or true conflict; (3) If false conflict, apply the law of the interested state; if true, apply forum law if forum is interested; (4) Apply the governing law to determine the result
Choice of Law Approach 3: Most Significant Relationship (2d Restatement)
Under this approach the court will apply the law of the state which is most significantly related to the outcome of the litigation. The court will consider connecting facts and policy principles
Application of the Most Significant Relationship Approach
(1) Discuss connecting facts; (2) Discuss policy principles (basically do an interest analysis); (3) Choose the governing law based on the most significant relationship; (4) Apply the law to determine the result
Torts: Vesting Approach
Governing law is the law where the injury occurred
Torts: Most Significant Relationship Test
Consider place of injury, conduct causing the injury, where the parties are at home, where the relationship is centered, the relevant policies of the forum state and other connected states
Torts: Exception to applying law of state where injury occured
If the rule at issue is a loss distribution rule (like a damage cap) or if the parties share a common domicile
Contracts: Rule
A choice of law provision will be enforced if it is valid and express (but it’s probably invalid)
Contracts: Invalid choice of law provision
(1) law selected has no reasonable relationship to the contract; (2) provision was included without true mutual assent