Childhood Flashcards
1
Q
Childhood as a social construct
A
- sociologists see childhood as socially constructed; in other words, as something created and defined by society. They argue that what people mean by childhood, and the position that children occupy in society, is not fixed by differs between different times, places and cultures. We can see this by comparing the western idea of childhood today worth childhood on the past and other societies
2
Q
The modern western notion of childhood
A
- it is generally accepted in of society today that childhood is a special time of life and that children are fundamentally different from adults. They are regarded as physically and psychologically immature and not yet competent to run their own lives. There is a belief that children’s lack of skills, knowledge and experience means that they need a lengthy, protected period of nurturing and socialisation before they are ready for adult society and its responsibilities
- as pilcher notes, the most important feature of the modern idea of childhood is separateness. Childhood is even as a clear and distinct life stage, and children in our society occupy a separate status from adults
- this is emphasised in several ways, for instance through laws regulating what children are allowed, required or forbidden to do. Their difference from adults is also emphasised through differences in dress, especially for younger children, and through products and services specially for children, such as toys, food, books, entertainments, play areas and so on
3
Q
The modern west notion of childhood - the ‘golden age’
A
- related to the separateness of children’s status is the idea old childhood as a ‘golden age’ of happiness and innocence. However, this innocence means that children are seen as vulnerable and in need of protection from the dangers of the adult world so they must be kept in ‘quarantined’ and separated from it. As a result, children’s lives are lived largely in the sphere of the family and education, where adults provides for them and protect them from the outside world. Similarly, unlike adults, they lead lives of leisure and play and are largely excluded from paid work.
- however, in this view of childhood as a separate age status is not found in all societies. It is not universal. As wagg says ‘there is no single universal childhood, experienced by all’
- this means that, whole all humans go through the same stages of physical development, different cultures construct or define this process differently
- in western cultures today, children are defined as vulnerable and unable to fend for themselves. However, other cultures do not necessarily see such a great difference between children and adults. We can see this by looking as examples both from other cultures today and from European societies of the past
4
Q
Cross cultural differences in childhood
A
- a good way to illustrate the social construction of childhood is to take a comparative approach - that is, to look at how children are seen and treated in other times and places than our own. The anthropologist Benedict argues that children in simpler, non industrial societies are generally treated differently from their modern western counterparts in three ways:
- they take responsibility at an early age: e.g, punch’s study of childhood in rural Bolivia found that, once children are five years old, they are expected to take work responsibilities in the home and in the community . Tasks are taken on without question or hesitation.
- less value is placed on children showing obedience to adult authority - e.g, firth found that among the tikopia of the western pacific, doing as you are told by a grown up s regarded as a concession to be granted by the child, not a right to be expected by the adult
- children’s sexual behaviour is often viewed differently - e.g, trobriand islanders of the south west pacific, Malinowski found that adults took an attitude of ‘tolerance and amused interest’ towards children’s sexuality explorations and activities
- Benedict argues that in many non industrial cultures, there is much less of a dividing line between the behaviour expected of children and that expected of adults. Such evidence illustrates the key idea that childhood is not a fixed thing found universally in the same form in all human societies, but is socially constructed and so differs from culture to culture
5
Q
The globalisation of western childhood
A
- some sociologists argue that western notions of childhood are being globalised. International humanitarian and welfare agencies have exported and imposed on the rest of the world, western norms of what childhood should be - a separate life stage, based in the nuclear family and school, in which children are innocent, dependent and vulnerable and have no economic role
- e.g, campaigns against child labour, or concerns about ‘street children’ in developing countries, reflect western views about how childhood ‘ought’ to be - whereas in fact, an important preparation for adult life. In this view, western style ‘childhood’ is spreading throughout the world. However, arguably such campaigns have little impact on the position of children in developing countries
6
Q
Historical differences in childhood
A
- the position of children differs over time as well as between societies. Many sociologists and historians argue that childhood as we understand it today is a relatively recent ‘invention’
- the historian Aries argues that in the Middle Ages, ‘the idea of childhood did not exist’. Children were not seen as having a different ‘nature’ pr needs from adults - at least not once they had passed the stage of physical dependency during infancy
- in the Middle Ages, childhood as a separate age stage was short. Son after being weaned, the child entered wider societies on much the same terms as an adult, beginning work from an early age, often in the household of another family. Children were in effect ‘mini adults with the same rights, duties and skills as adults. E.g, the law often made no distinction between children and adults, and children often faced the same serve punishments as those meted out to adults
- as evidence of his view, Aries uses work of art from the period in these, children appear without ‘any of the characteristics of childhood: they have simply been depicted on a smaller scale’ the paintings show children and adults dressed in the same clothing and working and playing together
- parental attitudes towards children in the Middle Ages were also very different from those today. Shorter argues that high death rates encouraged indifference and neglect, especially towards infants. E.g, it was not uncommon for parents to give a newborn baby the name of a recently dead sibling, to refer to the baby as ‘it’s, or to forget how many children they has had.
7
Q
The modern cult of childhood
A
- according to Aries, however, elements of the modern notion of childhood gradually began to emerge from the 13th century onwards:
- schools came to specialise purely in the education of the young. This reflected the influence of the church, which increasingly saw children as fragile ‘creatures of god’ in need of discipline and protection from worldly evils
- there was a growing distinction between children’s and adults clothing. By the 17th century, an upper class boy would be dressed in ‘an outfit reserved for his own age group, which set him apart from adults’
- by the 18th century, handbooks on childrearing were widely available- a sign of the growing child centredness of family life, at least among the middle classes
- according to Aries, these developments culminate in the modern ‘cult of childhood’. He argues that we have moved away from a world that did not see childhood as in any way special, to a world that is obsessed with childhood. He describes the 20th century as ‘the century of the child’
8
Q
Criticisms of Aries
A
- some sociologists have criticised Aries for arguing that childhood does not exist in the past. Pollock argues that it is more correct to say that in the Middle Ages, society simply had a different notion of childhood from todays
- however, Aries work is valuable because it shows that childhood is socially constructed: he demonstrates how ideas about children and their social status have varied over time
9
Q
Reasons for changes in the positions of children
A
- there are many reasons for the changes in the positions of children. These include the following changes during the 19th and 20th centuries:
- laws restricting child labour and excluding children from paid work - from being economic assets who could earn a wage, children became an economic liability, financially dependant on their parents
- the introduction of compulsory schooling - in the 1880 had a similar effect, especially for the children of the poor. The raising of the school leaving age has extend those period of dependency
- the growth of the idea of children’s rights - e.g, the children’s act defines parents as having ‘responsibilities’ rather than ‘rights’ in relation to children, while using the untied nations conventions on the rights of the child lays down basic rights such as entitlement to healthcare and education, protection from abuse and the right to participate in decision that affect them, such as custody cases
- declining family size and lower infant mortality rate - have encouraged parents to make a greater financial and emotional investment in the fewer children that they now have
- children’s development became the subject of medial knowledge- donzelot observes theories of children development that began to appear from the 19th century stressed that children need supervision and protection
- laws and policies that apply specifically to children - such as minimum ages for a wide range of activities, from sex to smoking, have reinforced the idea that children are different from adults and so different rules must be applies to their behaviour
10
Q
Reasons for changes in the positions of children - industrialisation
A
- industrialisation - most sociologists agree that the process of industrialisation - the shift front agriculture to factory production as the basis of the economy - underlines many of the changes. E.g, modern industry needs an educated workforce and this requires compulsory schooling of the young
- similarly, the higher standard of living and better welfare provision that industry makes possible lead to lower infant mortality rates. Industrialisation is thus a key factor in bringing about the modern idea of childhood and the changed status of children
11
Q
The disappearance of childhood - the future of childhood
A
- one influential view of the future of childhood is put forward by postman. Postman argues that childhood is ‘disappearing at a dazzling speed’. He points to the trend towards giving children the same rights as adults, the disappearance of children’s traditional unsupervised games, the growing similarity of adults and children’s clothing, and even to cases of children committing ‘adult’ crimes such as murder
- in postman’s view, the cause first of the emergence of childhood, and now its disappearance, lies in the rise and fall of print culture and its replacement by television culture
- during the Middle Ages, most people were illiterate, and speech was the only skill needed for the participation in the adult world. Children were able to enter adult societies from an early age. Childhood was not associated with innocence, nor the adult world with mystery. There was no division between the world of the adult and that of the child
12
Q
The information hierarchy
A
- postman argues that childhood emerged as a separate status along with mass literacy, from the 19th century on. This is because the printed word creates an information hierarchy: a sharp division between adults, who can read, and children who cannot.
- this gave adults the power to keep knowledge about sex, money, violence, illness, feather and other ‘adult’ matters a secret from children. These things became mysteries to them, and childhood came to be associated with innocence and ignorance.
- however, television blurs the distinction between childhood and adulthood by destroying the information hierarchy. Unlike the printed word, tv does not require special skills to access it, and it makes information available to adults and children alike. The boundary between adult and child is broken down, adult authority diminishes, and the ignorance and innocence of childhood is replaced by knowledge.
- the counterpart of the disappearance of childhood is the disappearance of childhood is the disappearance of adulthood, where adults and children’s attest and styles become indistinguishable.
13
Q
Evaluation of the future of childhood
A
- unlike postman, opine argues that childhood is not disappearing. Bases on lifetime of research into children’s unsupervised games, rhymes and songs, conducted with her husband opie, she argues that there is strong evidence of the continued existence of a separate children’s culture over many years
- postman’s study is valuable in showing how different types of communication technology, such as print and television can influence the way in which childhood is constructed. However, he over emphasises a single cause - television - at the expense of other factors that have influenced the development of childhood
14
Q
Childhood in postmodernity
A
- unlike postman, jenks does not believe childhood is disappearing, but he does believe it is changing
- jenks agrees with Aries that childhood was a creation of modern societies. For jenks, modern society was concerns with ‘futurity’ and childhood was seen as a preparation for the individual to become a productive adult in the future. To achieve this, the vulnerable, undeveloped child needed to be nurtured,, protected and controlled, especially by the ‘child centred’ family and by the education system, which imposed discipline and conformity on children
- now, however, jenks argues, childhood is once again undergoing changes as society moves away from modernity to postmodernity. In modern society, adulteration relationships were more stable, but in postmodern society, the pace of change speeds up the relationships become more unstable. E.g, divorce becomes much more common
- this generates feelings if insecurity. In this context, relationships with their children become more important as a source of adults identity and stability. While your marriage may end in divorce, you are still the parent of your child
- in postmodern society, relationships with their children thus become adults last refuge from the constant uncertainty and upheaval of life. As a result, adults become even more fearful for their children security and even more preoccupied with protecting them from perceived dangers such as child abuse
- this further strengthens the prevailing view of children as vulnerable and in need of protection that we have already seen in the modern notion of childhood, resulting in even greater surveillance and regulation of children’s lives
- for this reason, jenks does not agree with postman that we are seeing the disappearance of childhood. Childhood continues to be a separate status, and the legal and other restrictions placed on what children can do continues to mark them off from adults.
15
Q
Evaluation of postmodernity
A
- evidence both for against jenks is limited. There is some evidence that parents see their relationship with her children is more important than that with their partners, and that parents are very concerned about the risks they believe their children face. However, the evidence co,es from small, unrepresentative studies.
- jenks is guilty of over generalising. Despite the greater diversity of family and childhood patterns found today such as lone parent families, he makes rather sweeping statements that imply all children are in the same situation