Cheam Religious Language Flashcards

1
Q

Which theory states that language is only meaningful if it can be verified by empirical evidence or it is a tautology?

A

Verificationism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is the following an analytic or synthetic statement:

All bachelors are unmarried men

A

Analytic - because it would be incoherent to deny the truth of the statement. It is true in of itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which theory states that language is meaningless if there is no way of knowing how to prove it wrong?

A

Falsification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which philosopher suggested that the meaning of words is determined by Language Game of which the words are part?

A

Wittgenstein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which approach to language is also known at the Apophatic Way?

A

The Via Negativa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which philosopher proposes religious language as symbolic?

A

Tillich

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is the following statement analytic or synthetic:

All bachelors are lonely

A

Synthetic - because there needs to be some sort of test to check the validly of to statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can be described as a story that communicates values/beliefs of cultures or societies but are not necessarily factually correct?

A

Myth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who is the main philosopher linked to verificationism?

A

Ayer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Before weak and strong verification, Ayer suggested two other categories. What are they?

A

Practical verifiability and verifiability in principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

After Ayer rejected his own distinctions of weak and strong verification he suggested two other distinctions. What are they?

A

Directly and indirectly verifiable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does John Hick defend religion though verification?

A

He suggests that God-talk can be ‘eschatologically verifiable.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who suggested that if a statement is ‘scientific’ it could be potentially falsifiable and therefore meaningful?

A

Popper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who used the parable of the gardener?

A

Flew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who did the parable of the garden originally come from?

A

Wisdom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do Flew and Wisdom’s understanding of their parables differ?

A

Flew believes that the parable demonstrates that religious believers refuse to let their beliefs be falsified whereas Wisdom believes that the parable shows that, just as we cannot verify the existence of a gardener, the existence/nature of God is outside our methods of scientific enquiry.

17
Q

Who uses the parable of the lunatic and the dons?

A

Hare

18
Q

Who suggests that original belief is lost through ‘the death of a thousand qualifications’?

A

Flew

19
Q

What concept of Hare’s means the way in which a person sees the world that is unchanging?

A

Blik

20
Q

Who uses the parable of the partisan and the stranger?

A

Mitchell

21
Q

Which two philosophers are linked to the origin of the via Negativa?

A

Maimonides and Pseudo-Dionysius

22
Q

How is God defined in Tillich’s thinking?

A

The Ground of Being

23
Q

Is the following an example of univocal or equivocal language:
Cricket

A

Equivocal - because it could be the insect or the game

24
Q

Is the following and example of univocal or equivocal language:
Female

A

Univocal - there is only one understanding of the word female

25
Q

Aquinas suggests that we can talk meaningfully about God through analogy. What two categories of analogy does he propose?

A

Proportion and attribution