Charlie Munger's 25 psychological tendencies of human misjudgement Flashcards

from http://www.rbcpa.com/mungerspeech_june_95.pdf

1
Q

First: Under-recognition of the power of what psychologists call ‘reinforcement’
and economists call ‘incentives.’

A

http://www.rbcpa.com/mungerspeech_june_95.pdf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

My second factor is simple psychological denial

A

This first really hit me between the eyes when a friend of our family had a super-athlete,
super-student son who flew off a carrier in the north Atlantic and never came back, and his
mother, who was a very sane woman, just never believed that he was dead. And, of
course, if you turn on the television, you’ll find the mothers of the most obvious criminals
that man could ever diagnose, and they all think their sons are innocent. That’s simple
psychological denial. The reality is too painful to bear, so you just distort it until it’s
bearable. We all do that to some extent, and it’s a common psychological misjudgment
that causes terrible problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Third: incentive-cause bias, both in one’s own mind and that of ones trusted
advisor, where it creates what economists call ‘agency costs.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fourth, and this is a superpower in error-causing psychological tendency: bias
from consistency and commitment tendency, including the tendency to avoid or
promptly resolve cognitive dissonance. Includes the self-confirmation tendency of
all conclusions, particularly expressed conclusions, and with a special persistence
for conclusions that are hard-won.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fifth: bias from Pavlovian association, misconstruing past correlation as a reliable
basis for decision-making.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sixth: bias from reciprocation tendency, including the tendency of one on a roll to
act as other persons expect.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Seventh, now this is a lollapalooza, and Henry Kaufman wisely talked about this:
bias from over-influence by social proof – that is, the conclusions of others,
particularly under conditions of natural uncertainty and stress.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Nine [he means eight]: what made these economists love the efficient market
theory is the math was so elegant.

A

And after all, math was what they’d learned to do. To the man with a hammer, every
problem tends to look pretty much like a nail. The alternative truth was a little messy, and
they’d forgotten the great economists Keynes, whom I think said, “Better to be roughly
right than precisely wrong.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nine: bias from contrast-caused distortions of sensation, perception and cognition.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Bias from over-influence by authority.
A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Eleven: bias from deprival super-reaction syndrome, including bias caused by
present or threatened scarcity, including threatened removal of something almost
possessed, but never possessed.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bias from envy/jealousy.

A

Well envy/jealousy made, what, two out of the ten commandments? Those of you who
have raised siblings you know about envy, or tried to run a law firm or investment bank or
even a faculty? I’ve heard Warren say a half a dozen times, “It’s not greed that drives the
world, but envy.”

Here again, you go through the psychology survey courses, and you go to the index:
envy/jealousy, 1,000-page book, it’s blank. There’s some blind spots in academia, but it’s
an enormously powerful thing, and it operates, to a considerable extent, on the
subconscious level. Anybody who doesn’t understand it is taking on defects he shouldn’t
have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

. Bias from chemical dependency.

A

Well, we don’t have to talk about that. We’ve all seen so much of it, but it’s interesting
how it’ll always cause this moral breakdown if there’s any need, and it always involves
massive denial. See it just aggravates what we talked about earlier in the aviator case, the
tendency to distort reality so that it’s endurable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Bias from mis-gambling compulsion.
A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bias from liking distortion, including the tendency to especially like oneself, one’s
own kind and one’s own idea structures, and the tendency to be especially
susceptible to being misled by someone liked. Disliking distortion, bias from that,
the reciprocal of liking distortion and the tendency not to learn appropriately
from someone disliked.

A

z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Seventeen [he means 16]: bias from the non-mathematical nature of the human
brain in its natural state as it deal with probabilities employing crude heuristics,
and is often misled by mere contrast, a tendency to overweigh conveniently
available information and other psychologically misrouted thinking tendencies on
this list.

A

z

17
Q

. Now we come to bias from over-influence by extra-vivid evidence.

A

z

18
Q

Twenty-two [he means 18]: Mental confusion caused by information not
arrayed in the mind and theory structures, creating sound generalizations
developed in response to the question “Why?” Also, mis-influence from
information that apparently but not really answers the question “Why?” Also,
failure to obtain deserved influence caused by not properly explaining why.

A

z

19
Q

Other normal limitations of sensation, memory, cognition and knowledge.

A

Well, I don’t have time for that.

20
Q

Stress-induced mental changes, small and large, temporary and permanent

A

Here, my favorite example is the great Pavlov. He had all these dogs in cages, which had
all been conditioned into changed behaviors, and the great Leningrad flood came and it just
went right up and the dog’s in a cage. And the dog had as much stress as you can imagine
a dog ever having. And the water receded in time to save some of the dogs, and Pavlov
noted that they’d had a total reversal of their conditioned personality. And being the great
scientist he was, he spent the rest of his life giving nervous breakdowns to dogs, and he
learned a helluva lot that I regard as very interesting.

I have never known any Freudian analyst who knew anything about the last work of
Pavlov, and I’ve never met a lawyer who understood that what Pavlov found out with
those dogs had anything to do with programming and de-programming and cults and so
forth. I mean the amount of elementary psychological ignorance that is out there in high
levels is very significant[?].

21
Q

. Then we’ve got other common mental illnesses and declines, temporary and
permanent, including the tendency to lose ability through disuse.

A

Z

22
Q

And then I’ve got development and organizational confusion from say-something
syndrome.

A

Z