Charles I Flashcards
charles I personality
‘complete contrast to his father’ - Kevin Sharpe
charles was shy and had a speech defect. he was approachable but more damaging and uncommunicative with parliament.
he was also much more insecure about his position in comparison to james.
views on monarchy
charles had an inferiority complex that made him overstress his prerogative. he was unwilling to compromise, and unable to understand viewpoints that differed from his. slight criticism he often considered as rebellion.
court of charles
regarded as a microcosm of his state, and a model of what could be achieved in country.
there was strict order imposed in court, which made him appear isolated from the country.
dominated by catholics + arminians - catholics strongly linked to absolutism.
finance of the crown
crown debt was over £1 million>
charles asked for a loan of £60,000 from london merchants.
parliament offered to give charles tonnage and poundage for only a year.
forced loan
force loan was non-parliamentary taxes which charles demanded from the political nation without parliaments permission.
what he asked for was equivalent to 5 parliamentary subsidies.
this was a test of political loyalty, and 76 people were imprisoned for refusal to pay the loan. only 70% of respected amount was collected.
foreign policy failure : cadiz
1625 : this was an anti-spanish intervention in the 30 year war.
6,000 troops to spanish netherlands : 400 died of disease and starvation. there was no training and limited weaponry.
england had no money so this was an attempt to take spanish gold. lots of troops were lost on the way.
another call for parliament in 1626 asking for money, but buckingham was blamed for the failure.
parliament 1626
charles removed much of his opposition like the lord keeper.
charles blamed failures at cadiz on parliament for not giving him enough money. but parliament was unwilling to give large amounts of money for the invasion.
parliament attempts to impeach buckingham, which results is charles dissolving parliament to protect buckingham.
la rochelle 1627
buckingham as lord high admiral controls the fleet, with a force landing on Ire de ce - an attack on french.
when they arrived to the fortress which they waited months to get to, their scaling ladders were too short.
they sent 8k soldiers but only 3k returned, this was incredibly embarrassing and lost charles’ prestige.
britain was now at war with spain and france.
parliament 1628-29
parliament agreed to give charles 5 subsidies if certain grievances were addressed : the three resolutions
three resolutions
- charles promotion of arminianism.
- charles’ continued collection of tonnage and poundage without parliamentary consent.
- If anybody pays Tonnage and Poundage not granted by parliament they shall be seen as an enemy to the kingdom.
charles dissolved parliament.
the five knights case
1628 : this was a reaction to the forced loan.
5 knights were men who refused to pay the loan.
they were imprisoned for treason.
MPs were unhappy with the decision to imprison them.
charles attempted to amend judgement to make it so he could imprison anyone.
judges refused.
the petition of right
1628 : This asked for a settlement of Parliament’s complaints against the King’s non-parliamentary taxation and imprisonments without trial, plus the unlawfulness of martial law and forced billets
st gregory’s case
1633 : parishioners of st gregory’s church in london challenged the moving of their communion table to a different spot.
meant that family pews would have to be moved which caused offence.
heavily upset puritan sensibilities.
parishioners brought to privy council by charles as a test case.
john williams
bishop j williams was imprisoned in 1637.
this was a result of his publishing criticism of altar policy in “the holy table, name and thing”.
criticism indicate terminology was source of debate - “altar” regarded as catholic.
prynne, burton, bastwick
1637 : they were well respected puritans brought before star chamber for criticism of church policy.
men were found guilty of criticising laud’s measures.
they were fined £5,000 and imprisoned for life.
they went through public cropping of ears that earned sympathy.
john lilburne
was a puritan who helped distribute Batswick’s work.
driven to oppose laudinism, committed himself to print. he was found guilty at star chamber of printing unlicensed literature.
punishment : fined and whipped, pilloried in public.
in prison he still continued to write.