Charities Flashcards

1
Q

Preamble

A

1601

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2006/2011 Charity Definition

A

A) must be charitable and fall within one of the heads of charities listed
B) Charity must confer a public benefit
C) purpose must be wholly charitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Charitable purposes list :

A

S.3(1) Charities Act 2011

13 headings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tax v Pemsel 1891

A

3 heads > Religion, Education, Poverty
Presumption of Charitable for these ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Charities public benefit legislation

A

S.2(1)(a) Charities Act 2011
S.4 - public benefit test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

National Anti Vivisection v IRC
(prior to 2006 Act)

A

Lord Montgomery > prima facie assumed to 3 heads unless controversy appears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S.4 2011 Act

A

Public Benefit Test
It is not to be presumed for public benefit
Definition is as we understand it in law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

S.17 (a)

A

CCG must issue guidance on PB & review this guidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Public benefit (1) Benefit Aspect

A
  • benefit must be clear & identifiable
  • must be related to aims of charity
  • must be beneficial and detriment mustn’t outweigh the benefit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Public Benefit (2) Public Aspect

A
  • Must benefit public generally or sufficient section.
  • opportunity mustn’t be limited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re Pinion (1965)

A

Art collection > no identifiable benefit - didn’t satisfy Benefit Aspect of PB test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Morice v Bishop of Durham 1804

A

Proving benefit > if intangible item then Merits test applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dingle v Turner (1972)

A

Relief of poverty can have a personal Nexus > Lord Cross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Verge v Somerville 1924

A

Geographical restrictions for public aspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

re reschs will trust

A

people in poverty must be excluded
(But poverty as fluid term)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hadaway v hadaway

A

Any profit must go back to charity / staff

17
Q

Oppenhiem v Tobacco 1951

A

(1) possible beneficiaries shouldn’t be numerically negligible
(2) personal nexus test > employees / private members club NOT ok

18
Q

AG v CC 2012

A

Clarified that 2011 Act hadn’t changed the law