Charitable Purpose Trusts Flashcards
Why are they a good thing
Dispel beneficiary principle Tax advantages No time limit Cy-Pres Intention is enough for property
Who deals with their running
Charity Commission/Tribunals
1601 Act
Basic, developed from this and changed as charities change over time as well
Pemsel
Lord Mcnaughton
Poverty, Education, Religion and Other
Four heads of charity
Scottish Burial v Glasgow Corporation
Lord Wilberforce - Handy for heads, but really just needs to be public benefit requirement and fit within preamble
Benefit part
Re Shaw - Bigger alphabet? No
Balanced against harm - Anti vivisection v IRC - Can test on animals
Re Fouxeavu - Can’t test
Indirect benefits - Re Resch’s Will Trusts
Public
Has to be for section of public, but not political.
Bowman v Secular society - Court cannot judge whether a certain change in law would be beneficial
Poverty
CP - Re Clarke - Destitute, what’s not normal
Re Sanders Will trust - Didn’t have requirement to be poor
PB - Dingle v Turner - Employees
Re Sengelman - Relatives
Education
Re Shaw’s Will Trust - Masterpieces
CP - Re Pinion - Junk doesnt count as educational
PP - Re Hopkinson
PB - Independent Schools v Charity Commission
Religion
Thorton v Howe - Set out test 1) Belief in supreme beings 2) Seriousness 3) Worship 4) Moral PB - Re Hetherington
Health/Saving Lives
Re Resch Will Trust
Recuse Services
Cy-Pres
It can be used for a similar purpose despite failure
Whit v Williams - Church split
Initial Failure
It was impossible, need to see if there is a general charitable intention, if there is change it, but if not money goes to settlor
Re Slatter’s Will Trusts - TB
General Charitable Intent
Re Rymer - Priests education no longer there couldn’t do it
Re Harwood - Peace, one they wanted to give it to never existed
Charity by association
When other trusts have had similar purposes.
Re Jenkins Wills Trust - Anti-vivisection cannot become charitable