CHARACTERIZATION PROBLEMS RAISED BY CERTAIN ASSETS Flashcards
Apportionment of business profits
One spouse may bring an SP business into the marriage and devote community labor to the business. At divorce or death, the business may have appreciated and assets may have been purchased with business profits. To apportion between SP & CP aspects of the business, courts have developed 2 apportionment methods.
2 apportionment accounting methods:
- Van Camp
- Pereira
Van Camp Accounting
- The manager’s services are valued at the going market salary.
- The family expenses that were paid from business earnings are then subtracted.
- The remainder, if any, represents the CP of the business. The rest of the business is SP.
Use where capital investment was the major factor in the business’s growth, and spouse’s skills and efforts were less of a factor. Look for instances where spouse
was paid substantial salary and large bonuses (meaning the community was compensated).
Formula:
- Start with value of spouse’s services at market rates (how much would executives in similar positions be compensated on the market?)
- MINUS family expenses paid from community funds EQUALS community component.
- The balance is SP.
Periera Accounting
SP consists of the manager’s seperate capital + a fair rate of return. The rest is CP.
Use where spouse’s time, skill, and effort are major factors in growth of business. Look for instances where spouse contributed creative ideas or develops new techniques, and/or worked long hours and only drew modest salary.
Formula:
- Pay interest on SP (legal rate of 10% annum) on value of business at time of the marriage.
- The rest is CP
CA Supreme Court on using either Van Camp or Periera?
California Supreme Court has said that court is not bound either to adopt Pereira or Van Camp.
May select whichever formula will achieve substantial justice between the parties.
Pension benefits
Employee retirement benefits accumulated during marriage, whether or not vested at the time of divorce, are CP
Use a proration rule for pension benefits:
years service while married
_____________________________
total years employed to retirment
Two options for taking former spouses pension benefits the spouse is waiting for:
- if and when received decree; or
- cash her out
H’s election not to retire, despite ability to retirement maturing:
cannot defeat wifes present right to retirement benefit
If a nonparticipant spouse (“NPS”) in a qualified pension plan divorces a participant spouse…
her community property interest is recognized; under federal law she can get a qualified domestic relations order (“QDRO”) and receive payments from the plan.
What if the marriage ended by death rather than divorce. Does the NPS have a devisable interest in a qualified plan if she predeceases the participant?
No
There is federal preemption under the Employment
Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), which trumps CP laws. Her interest is terminated when she predeceased the participant.
Disability retirement benefits and workers’ compensation benefits are treated as:
wage replacement
Thus, disability retirement and workers’ compensation benefits are classified according to when received, not when earned so after divorce they are SP
What about severance pay?
o No clear rule (Courts of Appeal are split) – argue both ways!:
- H’s severance pay is SP because it replaced lost earnings which after a divorce or permanent separation would be H’s SP; OR
- H’s severance pay is CP because it arose from a collective bargaining agreement and was thus earned by employment during marriage.
Stock options
A stock option gives an employee (typically an executive) an option to purchase shares of the company’s stock at a set price on a certain date in the future. Stock options typically provide that they are not “vested,” and that the option-holder must be employed by the company as of
the date the option becomes exercisable for the option to vest.
If the stock option is awarded during marriage but does not vest until after the economic community has ended….
the proration formula that is used in determining what portion of the option is CP and what portion is SP depends on the primary intent of the employer in granting the option.