Character: Macbeth 🤴 Flashcards
‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
- L= double stress [spondee] on ‘oh full’
- and by severing/breaking the iambic pentameter, Shakespeare highlights how something is wrong/iffy.
‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
Hint: patriarchal language
- I= by referring to LM as ‘dear wife’, the use of patriarchal language reflects how in the Jacobean era, [most] women were subordinate and inferior to their husbands.
- since everything she owned, became her husbands’.
- This makes Lady Macbeth appear as as a possession- [juxtaposes to my dearest partner of greatness’ ?]
‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
Hint: what does it emphaise ?
I= ‘dear’ can perhaps emphasise Macbeth’s deep love for Lady Macbeth.
What alternative interpretations link to this quote ? ‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
- I= Alternatively, it could also suggest that internally he is beginning to blame Lady Macbeth, for the expensive/costly error/mistake of committing regicide and murdering Duncan
- although he was the one who murdered Duncan in cold blood]
- [this is highlighted by the adjective expensive, which is a synonym of the adjective: dear ]
‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
- L= metaphor- reflects the excruciating psychological pain [because a scorpion’s sting is excruciating].
- Additionally, the plural of the noun ‘scorpion(s)’ emphasises the pain he’s in since Banquo and Fleance are still alive, therefore this is the reason his mind is still so tortured.
- Fill in the gaps:
- In ‘Oh, ____ of ________ is my mind, ____ wife!’ 🦂 the plural of the noun ‘scorpion(s)’, emphasises the pain he’s in since Banquo and Fleance are still alive
- therefore this is the reason his mind is still so tortured.
- Additionally, the plural of the noun ‘scorpion(s)’ emphasises the pain he’s in since Banquo and Fleance are still alive.
- therefore this is the reason his mind is still so tortured.
What context relates to the quote: ‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ ?🦂
- C= by referring to LM as ‘dear wife’, the use of patriarchal language reflects how in the Jacobean era, [most] women were subordinate and inferior to their husbands.
- Everything she owned, became her husbands’. This makes Lady Macbeth appear as as a possession- [juxtaposes to my dearest partner of greatness’ ?]
What other alternative interpretations, link to this quote: Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
- I= On the other hand, it suggests he was internally being attacked, and forced to murder Duncan by the ‘scorpions’.
- Macbeth is trying to not take accountability for actions, and instead tries to shift blame for murdering Duncan
- he tries to not only blame his wife, but external forces that he argues are at play. Labelling them as scorpions.
‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ 🦂
Hint: echoes
- This echoes/imitates what Lady Macbeth said previously in the playing, asking Macbeth to become the ‘serpent’- satan.
- If Macbeth has doubts about what could happen next, he should exclaim that full of serpents is his mind; he doesn’t.
- This is because, becoming a serpent connects himself to evil; it’s quite ironic how Macbeth doesn’t want to see himself as malicious and evil, yet he was the one who committed these treacherous and malicious acts.
What’s ironic about the quote ‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ ?🦂
- Macbeth deliberately uses the word choice of ‘scorpions’, in his mind instead of serpents.
- as using [concrete] the noun serpent connects himself to evil
- ; it’s quite ironic how Macbeth doesn’t want to see himself as malicious and evil, yet he was the one who committed these treacherous and malicious acts.
What other context can relate to the quote: ‘Oh, full of scorpions is my mind, dear wife!’ ? 🦂
- C/R= A Jacobean audience would expect Macbeth to be punished for committing treason against God, since it would be frowned upon.
- This is because, it contradicts the divine right of beings and great chain of being and Duncan- regicide [of King Duncan].
- ; a Jacobean audience would soon realise neither fate/destiny or God will punish Macbeth, it will instead be his own guilt conscience, torturing him.
‘It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.’ 📢
- Macbeth has used an extended metaphor in his soliloquy to equate [compare] life to a ‘brief candle’ and the living to a ‘poor’ actor who struts on a stage and is never heard again.
- By doing this, Shakespeare constructs Macbeth as a character who is self-aware he is simply playing a role. [perhaps suggesting Macbeth knows the outcome of what will happen/he can see the end]
‘It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.’ 📢
- I= Additionally, it could be argued Shakespeare [at this point in the play] uses Macbeth to express a message to his audience.
- as by claiming that life is a ‘tale’, it perhaps reflects how all of Shakespeare’s plays are tales/stories.
- moreover, a tale always has a moral lesson- therefore, he uses Macbeth word’s, to ward people of any idea of regicide, suggesting that if they do, it will be the cause of their tragedy/demise.
What context relates to the quote: ‘It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.’ 📢 ?
- Shakespeare uses Macbeth word’s, to ward people of any idea of regicide, suggesting that if they do, it will be the cause of their own tragedy/demise.
- C= And a Jacobean audience would understand this message because of the gunpowder plot.
- this involved Guy Fawkes and his conspirators, [such as Robert Catersby] attempting to overthrow James I and place a Catholic ruler on the throne, by trying to blow up the houses of parliament [when James I was inside]
What alternative interpretations link to the quote: ‘It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.’ 📢 ?
- I= perhaps, Shakespeare also uses Macbeth as a mouthpiece, to has plant another message to his Jacobean audience [in this quote.]
- perhaps Shakespeare is arguing, there isn’t a meaning of life because God doesn’t exist- expressing his own view that we live for a short period of time and there is no hell or heaven.