Character Evidence Flashcards
General
not admissible to prove conduct in conformity.
o Propensity purposes
Defendant character in civil cases
Inadmissible to prove conforming conduct
Acted in accordance with the alleged character trait
Admissible if character is an essential element of a claim or defense
When character is “at issue” in the case (defamation, negligent entrustment, child custody, negligent hiring)
Defendant Character in Criminal Cases
The prosecution cannot introduce evidence of a defendant’s bad character to prove that the defendant has a propensity to have committed the crime in question
The defendant may present good character evidence that is inconsistent with the type of crime that is being charged.
Must be pertinent to the crime charged
Type of Character ev. in Criminal cases against D.
Must be through reputation in the community or opinion testimony
The prosecution may introduce negative character evidence to rebut the defendant’s evidence, i.e. after the defendant “opens the door.” Impeachment- must relate to same trait.
Evidence of Victim Character
A criminal D may intro. evidence of the victim’s character that is relevant to one of the D asserted.
Sex crimes-limited
•Form -Defendant can use opinion or reputation evidence
Prosecution ability to introduce victims character
prosecution can offer good character evidence only after the defendant has attacked the victim’s character.
Note 7: In a homicide case, the prosecution may offer evidence of the victim’s peacefulness to rebut that the victim was the first aggressor.
Prior bad acts generally
Prior acts are not admissible to show propensity
BUT for Motive, Intent, Absence of Mistake, Identity, Common Plan
Prior bad acts civil cases
when character evidence is admissible (an element of a claim or D), it may be proved by:
•Reputation
•Opinion or
•Specific instances of conduct
Prior bad acts in criminal cases
when character evidence is admissible (“opened the door”), it may be proved by:
•Reputation or
•Opinion
Specific instances of conduct are not admissible
•Exceptions
oPros. may use character evidence to prove something other than propensity - MIMIC
-> can also be used to cross examine a character witness
Habit and Routine
Habit refers to the act of a person
•Routine practice refers to the acts of an organization
•Evidence of a person’s habit or the routine practice of an organization is
admissible to prove conduct in conformity on a particular occasion (propensity).
•May be admitted without corroboration or an eyewitness
Exam Tip 1: Habit is more specific than character evidence. On the MBE, words like “always” or “every time” generally refer to habit whereas words like “often” or “frequently” are more likely to imply character evidence.