Character Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the use of character evidence?

A

Can be evidence of propensity or credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the problem of adducing evidence of past offences

A

Gunney/ Malkin: forbidden reasoning - moral/reasoning prejudice - danger of assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rowton

A

Defendant good character can be adduced regarding his character as a whole - general reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Redgrave

A

Cannot adduce evidence of specific incidents of good character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Good character Direction

A

Vye test: 2 limbs
Credibility if gave evidence (Berrada),
Propensity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blemished character?

A

Where the defendant has no previous convictions, or very old ones, and so character as a whole is not completely clean - judge can tailor direction: Aziz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Shaw v The Queen

A

No previous convictions, but possession of a large quantity of cocaine - did not give good direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Doncaster

A

1 Trading Standards offence (conviction) - judicial discretion as to whether it is appropriate to treat the blemished defendant as being of good character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Durbin

A

Courts fairly liberal when it comes to discretion regarding good character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gray

A

Guidelines as to judicial discretion regarding good character direction
If of previous good character - must be given a good character direction
If there are past convictions, but due to their nature/age, the judge has discretion (if irrelevant to current case, discretion ought to be exercised in favour of the defendant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bad character evidence - s.98 CJA 2003

A

Evidence of/of a disposition towards misconduct on a defendant’s part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

‘misconduct’

A

guidance in s.112: commission of an offence/other reprehensible behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

‘reprehensible behaviour’

A

basic test is whether a reasonable man would disapprove of the conduct in question - Bishop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Weir and Others

A

sexual relationship between a 34 year old and a 16 year old = not reprehensible behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Saleem

A

possession of a large amount of downloaded photos of victims of assault was reprehensible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Osbourne

A

Verbal abuse towards former partner was not reprehensible behaviour, as it was motivated out of concern for the welfare of their child

17
Q

Rassi

A

Reprehensible behaviour - 86 year old loitering outside urinals, and following young boys in

18
Q

Lewis

A

Evidence of a ‘disposition towards’: collection of pornographic literature of a paedophilic nature

19
Q

Where are the 7 gateways for adducing bad character evidence found?

A

s.101 CJA 2003

20
Q

What are the uses for bad character evidence adduced under the gateways

A

In the right circumstances - go to both propensity and credibility

21
Q

R v Highton and Others

A

The use to which bad character could be put, depends on the matters to which it was relevant, after being adduced, rather than being dependent upon the gateway

22
Q

R v Edwards

A

Although the gateway chosen can influence the use

23
Q

Campbell

A

Once evidence is adduced, it can be used for any matter to which it is relevant

24
Q

s.101(1)(a)

A

Agreement of the parties

25
Q

s.101(1)(b)

A

defendant adduces the evidence himself

26
Q

s.101(1)(c)

A

important explanatory evidence - guidance given in s.102: if without it, the jury would find it impossible/difficult to properly understand other evidence, and its value for understanding is substantial.
Could be taken too far? Dolan. replaces the common law: Fulcher

27
Q

s.101(1)(d)

A

Relevant to an important matter in issue between the parties
(replaces the idea of similar fact evidence: Makin/DPP v P) - guidance in s.103(1)(a) and includes the question of whether a defendant has the propensity to commit offences of the kind with which he is charged