Chapters 3 & 4: Research Ethics, Quality in Qualitative Research Flashcards
What are the principles of research ethics?
protection from harm (physical and psychological)
respect for individual dignity
right to self-determination
right to privacy
protection of confidentiality
What is honesty and integrity in the research process?
declare potential conflicts of interest at the point where ethical approach is sought, and detail how these are to be avoided
avoid any fabrication or dishonest of data or presentation of findings
acknowledge fully and fairly the contribution of all those involved in the research project
Rigour
the practice of doing something with great care, thoroughly and systematically to ensure the process and outcome is of a high quality
has the research been carried out in a systematic manner?
Validity
in the context of qualitative research, this refers to the credibility or believability of the research - are the findings trustworthy
Reflexivity
what was the relationship between the researcher and the research they have carried out?
Transparency and Audit Trail
how clear is the research process?
Coherence
is there a clear thread running through the research that connects it all together?
Value/Contribution of the Research
is this research useful and applicable to the context in which it was conducted
Transparency
means providing as clearly as possible the information needed for the reader to make their own assessment of your work
it is closely linked to the provision of audit trails in which the information of data, from its raw state to its final interpretation, is explicitly documented
What is rigour in qualitative research?
the practice of doing something with great care, thoroughly and systematically to ensure the process and outcome is of a high quality
What is validity in qualitative research?
in the context of qualitative research, this refers to the credibility or believability of the research - are the findings trustworthy
What are guidelines for validity?
different methodologies may have different guidelines for validity
considerations regarding validity may be informed by epistemological
What are some guidelines for validity that some methodologies have?
transparency of analytic claims
validation through “next turn”
deviant case analysis
questions about the institutional character of interaction
the generalizability of finding
translating into quantitative methods
What is the transparence of analytic claims?
apparent validity: once you read the claim, you are convinced that they are transparently true
very similar to face validity
is the question doing what it’s supposed to?
What is validation through “next turn”?
expressions are understood within the context of an interaction
in conversations, does the next person’s response validate the researcher’s interpretation?