Chapters 3-12 Flashcards
Questions for Conducting Community Research: Who Will Generate What Knowledge, for Whom, and for What Purposes?
- What values and assumptions do we bring to our work?
- How can we promote community participation and collaboration in research decisions?
- How do we understand the cultural and social contexts of this research?
- At what ecological levels of analysis will we conduct this research?
Identifying Values in Community Research
Community psychologists do not view research as value-neutral:
o Need to understand your own values as a “producer of research.”
o Need to understand the values of others as a “consumers of research.”
Types of values to consider
o Social/Cultural
o Scientific
Three Philosophies of Science for Community Psychology Research:
Postpositivist, Constructivist
Critical
Postpositivist
o Epistemology (theory of knowledge): Knowledge is built through shared understanding, using rigorous methods and standards of the scientific community. o Methodology: Emphasis is placed on understanding cause and effect relationships, hypothesis-testing, modeling, and experimental methods.
Constructivist
o Epistemology: Knowledge is created collaboratively in relationship between researcher and participants.
o Methodology: Emphasis is placed on understanding contexts, meanings, and lived
experiences of participants; qualitative methods.
Critical
Epistemology: Knowledge is shaped by power relationships and location within social
systems.
o Methodology: Emphasis is placed on integrating research and action, attending to
unheard voices, and challenging injustice using a variety of methods.
Role of the Community Psychologist Researcher
- Use values to guide your work.
- Use defensible methods.
- Be willing to be wrong (test your ideas).
- Recognize value of opposing views; look for divergent solutions.
- Attend to unheard voices:
o Begin research at the level of those impacted but without a voice, without power. o Participatory community research.
Promoting Community Participation and Collaboration in Research
- Participant-conceptualizer: a person who acts as a community change agent and also conducts research on the effectiveness of those efforts.
- Context counts in data collection: the nature of the relationship between researcher and community members matters.
- Research needs to benefit communities, not just researchers; resist “data mining.”
Four Methodological Issues Involving Culture
- Methods for assessing cultural or ethnic identity
- Assumptions of population homogeneity
- Assumptions of methodological equivalence
- Between-group and within-group designs
Research questions should always what?
Research Questions Should Always Guide the Selection of Research Methods
Quantitative
o Emphasize measurement, statistical analysis, and experimental control.
o Study associations between survey variables: cause and effect.
o Allows for inclusion of more participants.
o Uses standardized measurements.
o Is more generalizable.
Qualitative
o Useful for examining situations, processes, and contexts and attending to unheard voices
of marginalized groups.
o Often used in initial exploration and theory development stages of research.
o Methods: participant observation, qualitative Interviews, focus groups, and case studies. o Common features:
Triangulation
Contextual meaning
Purposeful sampling
Reflexivity: clearly stating researcher assumptions and values
Thick description
Data analysis and interpretation
Multiple interpretations
Methods of qualitative research: participant observation, qualitative Interviews,
focus groups, and case studies.
Kelly’s Ecological Principles
Interdependence
Cycling of resources
Adaptation
Succession
Interdependence
o Different parts of an eco-system are interconnected.
o Changes in any one part of the system will have ripple effects on other parts of the
system.
Cycling of resources
o Systems can be understood by examining how resources are used, distributed, conserved, and transformed.
o Personal, social, and physical resources
o Social settings have many more resources than are commonly recognized; wastes in one
sector become raw materials in another.
o Harnessing under-utilized resources can be a key intervention.
Adaptation
o Focuses on transactions between person and environment.
o Individuals, settings, and systems must adapt to changing conditions cyclically.
Person-environment fit; e.g., enhancing competencies or making environment more friendly.
Succession
o Expects that settings and individuals change over time: as environments change, a more adaptable population will replace a less adaptable one.
o Environments favor some populations and constrain others.
o Focuses on the historical context of a problem.
o Important for problem definition and planning interventions.
Lewin’s Field Theory
Borrowing an analogy from field theory in physics, Kurt Lewin (1951) note that the behavior of a particle as it travels is influenced by many vectors (factors) and their interactions; therefore, it is not possible to accurately describe the behavior without knowing the dynamics of all the vectors. Lewin’s formula is as follows: B = ƒ(P, E)
Individual factors, Social settings, Physical environment
designed to alter:
Individuals’ abilities, Individuals’ perceptions,, Environmental factors
Standing Rules of Behavior
- Some behavior patterns in a setting remain constant even as people change (persons are interchangeable).
- Settings have rules (explicit and implicit) that maintain the standing behavior pattern.
- Behavior settings occur within physical settings.
Four Processes/Circuits
Program circuits
Goal circuits
Deviation-countering circuits
Veto circuits
Program circuits
-agenda and routines that guide the standing behavior pattern.
o Due to tension/embarrassment, newcomers are motivated to learn cues and behaviors. o Helps facilitate the goal circuit.
Goal circuits
—the purpose for the social setting; satisfy goals of individuals. o Lack of consensus reduces effectiveness.
o Accepted and understood by all members.
Deviation-countering circuits
-strategies to eliminate/reduce non-program behavior.
o Training individuals for roles and correcting behavior to improve performance.
o Sometimes ineffective.
o Sometimes in conflict with goal circuit.
Veto circuits
—exclusion of deviant persons from a setting.
Underpopulated Settings
- Settings with as many or more individuals than roles:
o Members easily recruited to fill roles.
o Some members are marginalized or left out.
o Vetoing circuits (behaviors to screen out potential members) common because
replacements are available.
- Settings with more roles than individuals:
o Increases members’ sense of responsibility for maintaining the setting.
o Offers members opportunities to develop skills they might not otherwise have learned. o Increases diversity of persons participating, attracting unused resources.
o If too underpopulated, a setting might “burn out.”
Limitations of Barker’s Behavior Settings
- Focus on behavior, overlooking cultural meanings and other subjective processes.
- Focus on how settings perpetuate themselves and mold behavior of individuals, but ignores how settings are created and changed and how individuals influence settings.
Moos posited that participants share perceptions of a setting based on three dimensions:
-Relationships—mutual supportiveness, involvement, cohesion
- Personal development—the extent to which personal development is fostered in a setting;
emphasizes individual autonomy and skill development.
- System maintenance and change—emphasis on order, clarity of rules and expectations, and
control of behavior
Moos developed social climate scales for variety of microsystem and organizational settings:
- Answers are aggregated to form a profile across the dimensions.
-Assesses additional setting qualities:
o Physical features
o Organizational policies and norms
o Supra-personal factors
- Adding together the individual factors in setting—balance of gender, ethnicity, disability, class, etc.
- Comparisons of social climate perceptions can be made between different stake holders.
- Lead to conversations about intervention.
- Can track changes in climate over time.
- Social climate scores have been associated with individual and setting outcomes.
- Satisfaction, performance, well-being, adjustment, cohesion, influence
- Can be problematic due to unclear score interpretation.
Moos’ Social Climate Scales
-Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS)—assess psychiatric ward social environment
- Community-Oriented Programs Environment Scale (COPES)—assess psychosocial environment
of transitional, community-oriented psychiatric treatment programs
- Family Environment Scale (FES)—measure perceived family qualities among other scales
- Used to compare and evaluate settings and to match client’s needs and abilities with setting
Types of Communities
Locality-based communities—city blocks, neighborhoods, small towns, cities, rural regions.
Relational communities—internet-based groups, student organizations, mutual help groups,
religious congregations, workplaces.
Community functions
Help find meaning in everyday life.
Provide sense of community and belonging.
Provide important community services.
Valuable for members of oppressed populations.
Can challenge forces of mainstream culture
Neighboring
informal contacts and assistance among neighbors.
Place attachment
emotional bonding to the physical environment.
Citizen participation
Citizen participation