Chapter three: The exclusive rules of evidence Flashcards
the exclusive rules of evidence deal with
- veracity
- propensity
- hearsay
- opinion
- ID
- improperly obtained evidence
veracity
a disposition to refrain from lying
propensity
a tendency to act in a particular way
When do rules not apply for evidence about a persons veracity?
If veracity is an element of the offence eg perjury
In deciding whether evidence about a witness’s veracity is helpful, the judge may consider:
(a) lack of veracity on the part of the person when under a legal obligation to tell the truth (for example, in an earlier proceeding or in a signed declaration):
(b) that the person has been convicted of 1 or more offences that indicate a propensity for dishonesty or lack of veracity:
(c) any previous inconsistent statements made by the person:
(d) bias on the part of the person:
(e) a motive on the part of the person to be untruthful.
substantial helpfulness is not a sufficient test in two instances:
- where the prosecution wish to offer evidence about a defendants veracity
- where a defendant offers veracity evidence against a co defendant
the prosecution in a criminal proceeding may offer evidence about a defendants veracity only if:
(a) the defendant has offered evidence about his or her veracity or has challenged
the veracity of a prosecution witness by reference other than the facts in issue;
and
(b) the Judge permits the prosecution to do so.
38 – in determining whether or not to give persmission on veracity the judge may take into account the following matters
(a) the extent to which the defendant’s veracity or the veracity of a prosecution
witness has been put in issue in the defendant’s evidence:
(b) the time that has elapsed since any conviction about which the prosecution seeks to give evidence: (c) whether any evidence given by the defendant about veracity was elicited by the prosecution.
propensity evidence means
means evidence that tends to show a person’s propensity to act in a particular way or have a particular state of mind, being evidence of acts, omissions, events or circumstances with which a person is alleged to have been involved
propensity evidence does not include
- 1 of the elements of the offence for which the person is being tried or
- the cause of action in the proceeding in question
propensity evidence includes
- propensity as to actions
- propensity as to state of mind
propensity evidence does not include
- evidence of an act or omission that is one of the elements of the offence for which the person is being tried
- evidence that is solely or mainly about veracity
the only way that the prosecution can offer propensity evidence about that defendant is:
- if he offers propensity evidence about himself or
- s43 is satisfied
The prosecution may offer propensity evidence about a defendant in a criminal proceeding only if
the evidence has a probative value in relation to the issue.
This outweighs the risk that evidence may unfairly prejudice the defendant
True of false: the defendant does not have to be convicted as a result of his or her earlier wrong doing
true
Define hearsay evidence
made by a person other than a witness AND is offered in evidence at the proceeding to prove the truth of its contents
criteria for hearsay evidence admissibility
- reliability
- unavailability or that undue expense or delay would be caused
WHY is hearsay evidence not reliable?
- no opportunity to cross examine them regarding its contents, the circumstances in which is was made and so on
- the rule addresses the concern that juries cannot evaluate evidence properly without being able to see the demeanour of the person who made the statement in question
- there is a danger that witnesses will make mistakes about the meaning or contents made by other people eg Chinese whispers
define “unavailable as a witness”
if the person is
- dead
- outside NZ and not reasonable practicable to be a witness
- is unfit due to age / physical/ mental condition
- cannot with reasonable diligence be ID’d or found
- not compellable to give evidence
is a pre trial statement of a defendant in a criminal case hearsay?
No
in order for opinion to be admissible it must fulfil two basic criteria:
- opinion must be the only way in which to effectively communicate the information to the finder of fact
- the witness must be stating an opinion (be in conclusion, inference etc) from something personally perceived
criteria for “expert evidence”
- be that of an expert
- comprise of expert evidence
- offer substantial help to the fact finder in understanding other evidence or ascertain any fact in the proceeding
definition of an expert
person who has specialised knowledge or skill based on training, study or experience
expert opinion evidence will be admissible if the fact-finder is likely to obtain substantial help from the opinion in:
- understanding other evidence
- in ascertaining any fact that is of consequence in the determination of the proceeding
if the defendant intents to call an expert witness, he must disclose a brief of evidence at least ____ days before the date fixed for the trial
14
the exclusive rules of evidence deal with
− veracity
− propensity − hearsay − opinion − identification − improperly obtained evidence.