chapter III Flashcards
what are the general principles of substitute consent under the Health Care Consent Act (HCCA)?
SDM must give or refuse consent based on prior wishes expressed by patient while capable and at least 16 years old
where no wish is known or it is impossible to comply with it; decision my be based on patient’s best interests
when determining a patient’s best interests, what are the factors?
values and beliefs while 16 and capable
prior expressed wish while under 16 or incapable
whether condition or well being are likely to improve
whether benefits outweigh risks
whether less intrusive treatment would be as beneficial
why would a SDM apply to the Consent and Capacity Board (CCB)?
SDM can apply to CCB
- for directions if prior wish is unclear
- for consent contrary to prior wish if patient would probably now consent because outcome significantly better than anticipated
SDM cannot apply to CCB or challenge a capable person’s decision or wish because it rash or medically unsound
SDM who acts in good faith in accordance with the Act cannot be held civilly liable
who can exercise substitute consent for personal care? (5)
court-appointed guardian
power of attorney for personal care
personal representative
family member and others
public guardian and trustee (PGT)
what safeguards are in place regarding substitue decision making?
regulated health professionals can apply to CCB if they believe SDM has not acted in accordance with prior wish or best interests
PGT must investigate allegations that incapable person is at risk of serious illness or injury, deprivation of liberty, or personal security
any person can apply to resolve question regarding guardianship or POA for personal care
what is the hierarchy of SDMs under the Health Care Consent Act?
- court appointed guardian
- POA for personal care
- personal representative appointed by CCB
- spouse/partner
- child, parent, or guardian
- parent with only right of access
- siblings
- other relatives
- PGT
when may a SDM exercise authority among other SDMs?
if they believe no one is at the same or higher level (according to HCCA)
believes such a person exists but that person is not a court-appointed guardian, POA, or personal representative and that person would not object
what happens if SDMs at the same level disagree?
PGT makes decisions
describe the case: Re Superintendent of Family & Child Services v. Dawson (application of “best interests” test)
young boy required surgery or else he could die. his parents refused consent to surgery because they believed that their son’s life was painful and meaningless and that it was in the boy’s best interests to be allowed to die peacefully.
the Court overturned the parents’ refusal, stating that it could not approve the wilful withholding of vital treatment, except in the most exceptional circumstances.
It is not for the courts or parents to discount and decide for a disabled individual the value of his or her life.
Furthermore, there was evidence that withholding the surgery might not cause death immediately, but rather increase the boy’s pain and cause his condition to deteriorate further. The Court concluded that withholding the surgery was not in the child’s best interests and made the boy a temporary ward of the Children’s Aid Society, which then consented to the surgery
describe the case: Janzen v. Janzen (application of “best interests” test)
man in vegetative state with no recovery
doctors recommended he be removed from life support. wife agreed and sister disagreed
both appealed. court sided with wife as the man didn’t have a high quality of life and he was unlikely to improve with treatment
describe the case: Scardoni v. Hawryluck (application of “best interests” test)
Alzheimer’s patient that is non-verbal and can’t communicate, placed on ventilator
Doctor believed ventilator was not worth it and causing more harm than good
SDM (daughters) wished to continue treatment
Doctor applied to CCB
Daughters said mom was a devote roman catholic and wished to extend life and its sancity
CCB said her statement of faith was not sufficiently precise enough to substitue as prior wish
Daughters appealed to courts which overturned CCB’s decision. they said religious beliefs didn’t matter, but a patient’s personal beliefs did
who has the authority to exercise substitute consent for property? (5)
- court-appointed guardian for property
- POA for property under Powers of Attorney Act
- POA for property under Substitue Decisions Act
- Statutory Guardian of Property under Mental Health Act
- Statutory Guardian of Property according to the Certificate of Incapacity
what are the general steps for substitute decision making for property?
third party may ask someone to submit a capacity assessment
individuals may arrange capacity assessment on their own
if assessors conclude that they’re incapable of managing property, must file certificate with PGT
PGT then becomes statutory guardian of property
POA, spouse, partner, or relative may apply to replace PGT
what safeguards are in place for substitute decision making for property?
PGT must investigate any allegation that incapable person has lost or may be at risk of losing significant portion of assets
if PGT reasonably believes the intervention necessary, must apply to court to become temporary guardian of property
any person may apply to court to resolve questions regarding guardianship or POA for property
what are the obligations of guardians and POAs of property?
fiduciaries: must act honestly and in utmost good faith for incapable person’s benefit
must encourage person’s participation as much as possible
must encourage regular personal contact between person and family/friends
must keep proper accounts