Chapter 9: Long-Run Economic Growth Flashcards
What is the Rule of 70?
A formula used to determine how long it takes a country’s real GDP per capita, or any other variable that grows slowly over time, to double. Note that the Rule of 70 can only be applied to a positive growth rate
What is the formula for calculating the Rule of 70?
Number of years for variable to double = 70/Annual growth rate of variable
What is long-run economic growth?
A sustained increase in output per capita
What is the relationship between household income growth and growth in real GDP per capita?
They grow, typically, in proportion to one another (i.e., 1% of growth in real GDP per capita = 1% growth in household income)
How much of the world live in countries with a lower standard of living than Canada a century ago?
25%
What is the difference in change in level and rate of change re: long-run economic growth?
Level = $ amount of growth, rate = % amount of growth
How is long-run economic growth measured?
Using real GDP per capita
How much has real GDP increased in Canada since 1900?
Almost ninefold
Why do economists use real GDP per capita to measure economic progress rather than some other measure, such as nominal GDP per capita or real GDP?
Nominal GDP per capita does not account for changes in price levels and may artificially inflate economic growth. Real GDP accounts for price changes but does not account for changes in population levels and may artificially inflate economic growth because if GDP only rises in tandem with rises in the population, real economic growth has not actually occurred. Therefore, real GDP per capita isolates both quantities of production and changes in the population and is a more accurate reflection of economic progress than nominal GDP per capita or real GDP
Although China and India currently have growth rates much higher than Canadian growth rate, the typical Chinese or Indian household is far poorer than the typical Canadian household. Explain why.
High growth rates in real GDP only reflects standards of living increases when comparing a country to its own past. The average Chinese or Indian household is living on a real GDP per capita that is significantly lower than Canada’s and is closer to the standards of living in Canada in 1900. Changes in real GDP per capita growth rates do not equate to changes in the level of real GDP per capita. Indian and Chinese real GDP per capita have not yet caught up with GDP per capita in Canada
What is the most important variable in long-run economic growth?
Rising (labour) productivity
What is labour productivity (aka productivity, aka Average Productivity of Labour (AP1))?
Output per worker, sometimes output per hour
What is the formula for productivity (aka output per worker)?
Real GDP/Number of people working
In the long run, what is the relationship between population growth and employment growth?
They typically grow close to one another (i.e., 1.7% increase in population = 2.1% increase in employment)
What is the difference between real GDP growth and real GDP per capita growth?
Real GDP can grow due to changes in population size. Real GDP per capita can only grow when output per worker increases, as it has accounted for population changes
What are the 3 main factors that explain growth in productivity?
Physical capital, human capital, and technological progress
What is physical capital?
Human-made, manufactured resources such as buildings or machines
What is human capital?
Improvements in labour created by the education and knowledge of the workforce
What is technological progress?
An advance in the technical means of production of goods and services
What is the aggregate production function (aka the Cobb-Douglas production function) (definition)?
A relationship that shows how the aggregate real quantity of output is produced using the available factors of production (the inputs: labour, physical capital, and human capital) and technology (A) and the function (F…)
What is the aggregate production function (aka the Cobb-Douglas production function) (formula)?
Y (GDP) = A (total factor productivity) * F(K (amount of physical capital used), L (amount of labour used), H (amount of human capital used))
What is total factor productivity?
Represented as A in aggregate production function. Helps account for output that is not the result of the productive inputs. It captures all inputs and technological features left out of the aggregate production function.
If total factor productivity and aggregate real output rise, and all else stays the same, what can this growth be attributed to?
Improvements in technology
What is the positive marginal productivity of physical capital (MPk)?
The amount by which productivity is increased as a result of a small increase in physical capital used
What is the per worker production function (definition)?
Function that shows how productivity (real GDP per worker) depends on the quantities of physical capital per worker, human capital per worker, and the state of technology
What is the per worker production function (formula)?
Y/L (real output (GDP) per worker) = A (total factor productivity) * f(K/L (real physical capital per worker), H/L (human capital per worker))
What does the per worker production function allow?
It allows economists to disentangle the effects of each of the three factors on overall production
What is the per worker production function developed by Shen, Wang, and Whalley in a 2015 study?
GDP per worker = A * Physical capital per worker^1/3 * Human capital per worker^2/3
What are diminishing returns to physical capital?
A per worker production function that holds the amount of human capital per worker and the state of technology fixed; each successive increase in the amount of physical capital per worker leads to a smaller increase in productivity
What is the diminishing marginal propensity of (physical capital) (aka dim MPk)?
The same as diminishing returns of physical capital: A per worker production function that holds the amount of human capital per worker and the state of technology fixed; each successive increase in the amount of physical capital per worker leads to a smaller increase in productivity
Why are there diminishing returns on physical capital?
Think of a farmer. A little bit of equipment makes a big difference: a worker with a tractor can do much more than a worker without one. However, a worker with a $40,000 tractor will not be double as productive as a worker with a $20,000 tractor, though they will still be more productive. There’s a huge difference between no tractor and a tractor, vs. an inexpensive tractor and an expensive tractor