Chapter 9 - Leading Teams Flashcards
work team
a small number of people with complementary skills who hold themselves mutually accountable for pursuing a common purpose, achieving performance goals, and improving interdependent work processes
Teams help firms improve _________ and ___________
Teams help firms improve product and service quality
Another reason for using teams is that teamwork often leads to increased ____________.
Another reason for using teams is that teamwork often leads to increased job satisfaction.
Teamwork can be more satisfying than traditional work because it gives workers a chance to improve their skills. This is often accomplished through ____________
Teamwork can be more satisfying than traditional work because it gives workers a chance to improve their skills. This is often accomplished through cross-training
cross-training
training team members to do all or most of the jobs performed by the other team members
rotating leadership among team members can lead to…
rotating leadership among team members can lead to more participation and cooperation in team decision making and to improved team performance.
teams can do a much better job than individuals in two important steps of the decision-making process:
defining the problem and generating alternative solutions.
some of the disadvantages of work teams:
initially high turnover, social loafing, and the problems associated with group decision making.
Social loafing
behaviour in which team members withhold their efforts and fail to perform their share of the work
groupthink
when members of highly cohesive groups feel intense pressure not to disagree with one another so that the group can approve a proposed solution
groupthink restricts discussion and leads to consideration of a limited number of alternative solutions, it usually results in poor decisions
Use Teams When…
there is a clear, engaging reason or purpose.
the job can’t be done unless people work together.
rewards can be provided for teamwork and team performance.
ample resources are available.
teams will have clear authority to manage and change how work gets done.
Don’t Use Teams When…
there isn’t a clear, engaging reason or purpose.
the job can be done by people working independently.
rewards are provided for individual effort and performance.
the necessary resources are not available.
management will continue to monitor and influence how work gets done.
Factors That Encourage People to Withhold Effort in Teams
The presence of someone with expertise.
Team members will withhold effort when another team member is highly qualified to make a decision or comment on an issue.
The presentation of a compelling argument.
Team members will withhold effort if the arguments for a course of action are very persuasive or similar to their own thinking.
Lacking confidence in one’s ability to contribute.
Team members will withhold effort if they are unsure about their ability to contribute to discussions, activities, or decisions. This is especially so for high-profile decisions.
An unimportant or meaningless decision.
Team members will withhold effort by mentally withdrawing or adopting a “who cares” attitude if decisions don’t affect them or their units, or if they don’t see a connection between their efforts and their team’s successes or failures.
A dysfunctional decision-making climate.
Team members will withhold effort if other team members are frustrated or indifferent or if a team is floundering or disorganized.
Autonomy
the degree to which workers have the discretion, freedom, and independence to decide how and when to do their work.
Exhibit 9.2
Exhibit 9.2 shows how five kinds of teams differ in terms of autonomy. Moving left to right across the autonomy continuum at the top of the exhibit, traditional work groups and employee involvement groups have the least autonomy, semiautonomous work groups have more autonomy, and, finally, self-managing teams and self-designing teams have the most autonomy. Moving from bottom to top along the left side of the exhibit, note that the number of responsibilities given to each kind of team increases directly with its autonomy. Let’s review each of these kinds of teams and their autonomy and responsibilities in more detail.
traditional work group
a group composed of two or more people who work together to achieve a shared goal
In this group, workers are responsible for doing the work or executing the task, but they do not have direct responsibility for or control over their work. Workers report to managers who are responsible for their performance and who have the authority to hire and fire them, make job assignments, and control resources.
employee involvement team
team that provides advice or makes suggestions to management concerning specific issues
Although team members offer advice and suggestions, they do not have the authority to make decisions. Membership on these teams is often voluntary, but members may be selected because of their expertise. The idea behind employee involvement teams is that the people closest to the problem or situation are best able to recommend solutions.
semiautonomous work group
a group that has the authority to make decisions and solve problems related to the major tasks of producing a product or service
Semiautonomous groups regularly receive information about budgets, work quality and performance, and competitors’ products. Furthermore, members of semiautonomous work groups are typically cross-trained in a number of different skills and tasks. In short, semiautonomous work groups give employees the authority to make decisions that are typically made by supervisors and managers. That authority is not complete, however. Managers still play a role—albeit a much reduced one—in supporting the work of semiautonomous work groups. In these groups, managers ask good questions, provide resources, and facilitate performance of group goals.
self-managing team
a team that manages and controls all of the major tasks of producing a product or service (also called a self-directed work team).
self-designing team
a team that has the characteristics of a self-managing team but also controls team design, work tasks, and team membership
cross-functional team
a team composed of employees from different functional areas of the organization
virtual team
a team composed of geographically and/or organizationally dispersed coworkers who use telecommunication and information technologies to accomplish an organizational task
A drawback to virtual teams is that the team members must learn to express themselves in new contexts. The give-and-take that naturally occurs in face-to-face meetings is more difficult to achieve through videoconferencing or other methods of virtual teaming. Indeed, several studies have shown that physical proximity enhances information processing in teams.
project team
a team created to complete specific, one-time projects or tasks within a limited time
They are often used to develop new products, significantly improve existing products, roll out new information systems, or build new factories or offices.
The project team is typically led by a project manager who bears the overall responsibility for planning, staffing, and managing the team, which usually includes employees from different functional areas. Effective project teams demand both individual and collective responsibility. One advantage of project teams is that drawing employees from different functional areas can reduce or eliminate communication barriers. As long as team members feel free to express their ideas, thoughts, and concerns, free-flowing communication encourages cooperation among separate departments and typically speeds up the design process.
norms
informally agreed-on standards that regulate team behaviour
Norms are valuable because they let team members know what is expected of them.
Studies indicate that norms are one of the most powerful influences on work behaviour because they regulate the everyday actions that allow teams to function effectively.