Chapter 9 Flashcards
covalent bond
forms between two atoms when a pair of electrons is shared
electron domain
the region where electrons will be found
bonding electron pair
forming a covalent bond
nonbonding electron pair
lone pair: electrons are located on one atom (NH3)
ideal e- domain geometry for 2 e- pairs
linear - 180
ideal e- domain geometry for 3 e- pairs
trigonal planar -120
ideal e- domain geometry for 4 e- pairs
tetrahedral - 109.5
ideal e- domain geometry for 5 e- pairs
trigonal bipyramidal (90, 120, 180)
ideal e- domain geometry for 6 e- pairs
octahedral (90)
lone pairs and bond angles
nonbonding e- pair exerts a repulsive force on adjacent e- pairs = compresses bond angles
bond angles decrease as nonbonding pairs increase: e.g. CH4 —> NH3 —> H2O
polar molecule
bond dipoles are not symmetrical
nonpolar molecule
bond dipoles cancel (e.g. equal and/or arranged symmetrically around the center)
2 e- domains
2 bonding
0 nonbonding
linear e- domain geometry and molecular geometry
3 e- domains
3 bonding
0 nonbonding
trigonal planar e- domain geometry
trigonal planar molecular geometry
3 e- domains
2 bonding
1 nonbonding
trigonal planar e- domain geometry
bent molecular geometry
4 e- domains
4 bonding
0 nonbonding
tetrahedral e- domain geometry
tetrahedral molecular geometry
4 e- domains
3 bonding
1 nonbonding
tetrahedral e- domain geometry
trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry
4 e- domains
2 bonding
2 nonbonding
tetrahedral e- domain geometry
bent molecular geometry
5 e- domains
5 bonding
0 nonbonding
trigonal bipyramidal e- domain geometry
trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry
5 e- domains
4 bonding
1 nonbonding
trigonal bipyramidal e- domain geometry
see saw molecular geometry
5 e- domains
3 bonding
2 nonbonding
trigonal bipyramidal e- domain geometry
t-shaped molecular geometry
5 e- domains
2 bonding
3 nonbonding
trigonal bipyramidal e- domain geometry
linear molecular geometry
6 e- domains
6 bonding
0 nonbonding
octahedral e- domain geometry
octahedral molecular geometry
6 e- domains
5 bonding
1 nonbonding
octahedral e- domain geometry
square pyramidal molecular geometry
6 e- domains
4 bonding
2 nonbonding
octahedral e- domain geometry
square planar molecular geometry
bonding vs. lone pair attraction
bonding e- pair is attracted by two atoms
nonbonding electron pair centers on one atom
lone pairs and bond angels
nonbonding e- pair exerts a repulsive force on adjacent e- pairs = compresses bond angles
bond angles decrease as nonbonding pairs increase: e.g. CH4 —> NH3 —> H2O
polar
bond dipoles are not symmetrical
nonpolar
bond dipoles cancel (e.g. equal and/or arranged symmetrically around the center)
molecules you should know
2 e- domains: BeCl2, HCN 3 e- domains: BCl3, CH2O, SO2 4 e- domains: CH4, AsO3^-3, H2O 5 e- domains: PF5, ClF4+, ICl3, XeF2 6 e- domains: SF6, ClF5, XeF4
VSEPR
predicts shape around central atoms
how do hybrid orbitals form?
AO combine to form hybrid orbitals
hybrid orbitals
it holds the shared pair of electrons
they possess directional properties
sp, sp2, sp3, (sp3d, sp3d2)
sp hybrid orbital
sp: BeCl2 - linear
sp2: BF3, SO2 - trigonal planar
sp3: CH4, NH3, H2O - tetrahedral
single bond
aka sigma bond
electron density concentrated on the axis connecting the nuclei (internuclear axis)
H2, Cl2, BeF2
double bond
pi bond
side to side overlap of p orbitals: above and below
p orbitals are not hybridized
they are perpendicular to internuclear axis
e- density is above and below nuclei plane (is there a probability of finding p e- density on internuclear axis? NO)
less overlap than sigma bond
ethylene C2H4 —> CH2 = CH2: 5 sigma bonds and 1 pi bond
which is stronger, pi or sigma bonds?
less overlap so the pi bond is weaker than sigma bond
triple bond
acetylene C2H2
one pi bond above/below, other pi bond is front/behind
acetylene
C2H2
ethylene
CH2 = CH2
delocalized pi bonding
possessed by molecules with two or more resonance structures
e.g. SO2, NO3-, benzene
MO for s orbitals
addition: sigma bonding orbital
- constructive interaction with high electron density along internuclear axis
subtractions: sigma antibonding orbital
- destructive interaction NO electron density between nuclei
which MO is more stable?
the more stable MO bonding orbital (sigma) is lower in energy that the atomic orbital (AO)
the less stable MO anti bonding orbital is higher in energy that the atomic orbital
BO
1/2 (electron in bonding MO - electrons in antibonding MO)
MO for p orbitals
when you add then you can make a sigma bonding orbital
constructive interaction with electron density along internuclear axis (like s MO)
subtraction: antibonding orbital
destructive interaction: NO electron density between nuclei (like s MO)
MO orbital for sideways p orbital overlap
addition: pi bonding orbital
- constructive interaction w/ e- density above/below, front/behind internuclear axis between nuclei
subtraction: pi antibonding orbital
- destructive interaction w/ NO e- density between nuclei
degenerate
p(pi) MO are degenerate = have the same exact energy
which is the most effective form of overlap?
head on is more effective than isdeways
MO exceptions for diatomics
sigma, pi, pi, sigma for B2, C2, N2
sigma, pi, sigma, pi for O2, F2, and Ne2
due to orbital interactions
BO and bond length
a BO of 1.5 has a shorter and stronger bond than a BO of 1.2