Chapter 8 Leadership Flashcards
Difference in the behaviours between a manager and a leader
Manager: Implement, organize, schedule, supervise
Leader: Inspire, motivate, coach, create, set a vision
Difference between a manager and a leader (Chart)
3 general types of leadership theories under Leadership as Supervision
- Trait theories: Leaders have a particular types of traits that makes them different from nonleaders (Leaders are born)
- Behavioural Theories: Particular behaviours differentiate leaders from nonleaders (Leaders can be trained)
- Contingency Theories: Leadership effectiveness is dependent on situations
Describe Trait Theory
- Leaders usually possess the following traits: Extraversion (like being around people and able to assert themselves), open to new experiences (creative and flexible), conscientiousness (disciplined and keep commitments they make) and emotional intelligence (Empathetic)
- Predicts only leadership potential or emergence not effectiveness
- Leaders are born
Ohio State Studies
Two dimensions that significantly accounts for most of the leadership behaviours:
- Initating Structure: The extent to which a leader is likely to define and structure his or her role and the roles of employees to attain goals e.g. assign group tasks, expects workers to maintain definite standards of performance, emphasizes the meaning of deadlines
- Consideration: The extent to which a leader is likely to have job relationships characterized by mutual trust, respect for employees’ ideas and regard for their feelings e.g. help employees with personal problems, friendly and approachable, treat all employees as equals, express appreciation and support
The Michigan Studies
- Employee-oriented leaders: emphasizes interpersonal relations by taking a personal interest in employees’ needs and accepting individual differences
- Production-oriented leaders: Emphaizes the technical or tasks aspects of the job and focus on accomplishing the group’s task
What are the 4 contingency theories? What do they focus on?
- Fiedler Contingency Model
- Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership
- Path-goal theory
- Substitutes for leadership
They focus on the relationship of the leader to followers and that relationship is important
Fiedler Contingency Model
- Effective group performance depends on the proper match between the leader’s style and the degree to which the situation gives the leader control
- assumes individual’s leadership style is fixed
- if a situation requires a task-oriented leader but the leader is relationship-oriented, he or she must be replaced or the situation has to be changed
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership
Effective leaders should adapt their leadership styles according to the ‘readiness’ of the followers, i.e. how willing and able they are to perform tasks
If the followers are unable and unwilling to do a task
Telling: Give clear and specific directions
If the followers are unable and willing to do a task
Selling: Display high-task orientation to get the task done and high relationship-orientation to ‘sell’ the leader’s desires
If the followers are able and unwilling to do a task
Participating: use a supportive and participative style
If the followers are able and willing
Delegating
What is Path-Goal Theory?
It’s the leader’s job to assist followers in attaining their goals by provide the necessary direction, support and resources and make sure their goals are compatible with the overall goals of the organization
3 guidelines that the Goal-Path Leadership theory suggest for effective leadership
- Determine the outcomes subordinates want e.g. good pay, job security, interesting work, autonomy
- Reward individuals with their desired outcomes when they perform well
- Let individuals know what they need to do to receive rewards (i.e. path to the goal), remove barriers and express confidence that they can perform well
Path-goal Leadership style (1)
Directive: Let followers know what is expected of them, schedules work to be done, gives specific guidance as to how to acomplish the task; best used for less-skilled and motivated workers
Path-goal leadership Style (2)
Supportive: Friendly and shows concerns for the needs of followers; effective when individuals are under stress and need support
Path-goal leadership style (3)
Participative: involve employees in decision-making to make them feel empowered and motivated; effective on skilled and motivated workers
Path-goal leadership style (4)
Achievement-oriented: Sets challenging goals and expects followers to perform at their highest level (Self-actualization); works well with highly-skilled and motivated workers who love challenging themselves
What are the individual substitutes for leadership?
Experience/training (for task-oriented), professionalism (for task and relationship-oriented), indifference to rewards (neutralizes task and relationship-oriented)