Chapter 8 Flashcards
Voidable contract
a contract that in certain circumstances, an aggrieved party can choose to keep in force or bring to an end
Void contract
A contract involving a defect so substantial that is of no force or effect.
Legal capacity
the ability to make binding contracts
Economic Duress
The threat of economic harm that coerces the will of the other party and results in a contract.
Physical duress
threats of physical harm
Actual pressure
one party has exerted unfair influence on the other
undue influence
unfair manipulation that compromises someone’s free will or choice
Unconscionable contract
an unfair contract formed when one party takes advantage of the weakness of another
Misrepresentation
A false statement of face that causes someone to enter a contract
Rescission
the remedy that results in the parties being returned to their pre-contractual positions
Remedy
damages for breach
mistake
an error made by one or both parties that seriously undermines a contract
common mistake
both parties to the agreement share the same fundamental mistake
Rectification
a remedy available where parties have made a mistake in recording their agreement and based on establishing the specific terms actually agreed to
Illegal contract
A contract that cannot be enforced because it is contrary to legislation or public policy
Public policy
the community’s common sense and common conscience
Contracts of guarantee
a guarantee is to promise to pay the debt of someone else, should that person default on the obligation
Contracts Not to be Performed Within a Year
the rationale for requiring a written record for these kinds of contracts is the difficulty of proving promises that were possibly made in the distant past
Contracts dealing with land
contracts concerning land – including leases and sales – generally must be evidenced in writing in order to be enforceable
Electronic signature
contracts are generally enforceable, no matter what form they take, but there are important exceptions
Sales of goods act
contracts for sale of goods (valued more than $50) must be in writing
Supreme Court held
the restrictive covenant in the employment agreement was valid