Chapter 72 Central and Peripheral Neurolysis Flashcards
KEY POINTS 1. Neurolytic therapy should only be considered after other pain modalities have been exhausted. These therapies are usually reserved for patients with terminal disease. Very clear therapeutic goals and limitations need to be communicated between patient and practitioner. 2. Neurolytics can offer patients the ability to decrease their systemic pain medications that can improve their quality of life and allow them the opportunity to clearly communicate with loved ones during diffi
Glycerol
used for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Phenol and ethyl alcohol
the only two agents commonly used in the epidural or intrathecal
space, as well as for sympathetic plexus neurolysis.
Chemical and surgical neurolysis is primarily limited to
patients with pain associated with terminal malignancies. These procedures provide the most benefit in the oncology patients in whom more conservative measures were unsuccessful, possessed too high a side effect burden, or
unable to be performed
In patients in extremis, neurolysis represents a
palliative measure to provide pain relief while
maintaining the patient’s ability to interact with family and friends in their final days to months of life. This can be
preferable to systemically delivered opioids, which may
interfere with the patient’s mental status enough to diminish
meaningful communication with family and friends.
Neurolysis is an alternative to allow patients the ability to
control their pain with less systemic medication,
significantly improving their quality of life.
Intrathecal Neurolysis: Indications for Neurolytic
Spinal Blockade
Intractable cancer pain (advanced or terminal malignancy)
Failure of medical and interventional analgesic therapy
Intolerable side effects of current therapy
Unilateral pain
Pain restricted to one to four dermatomal levels
Pain located in the trunk, thorax, abdomen
Primary somatic pain mechanism
Absence of intraspinal tumor spread
Effective analgesia with local anesthetic block
Informed consent of patient
Although neurolysis can provide analgesia in the dermatomal distribution affected by the block, it will not necessarily
provide pain relief from
an expanding tumor or new metastasis. In addition, the effects of this therapy can be temporary, and will diminish over time, requiring re- administration
of the neurolytic agent
Adverse Effects of Neurolysis
limb weakness and loss of bowel or bladder tone
With neurolysis patients
with complaints of neuropathic pain will not get the desired results compared to those with
visceral or somatic pain
Due to the nature of neurolytic administration, it is ideal
for controlling
unilateral pain in the trunk and focused
to a few adjacent dermatomes. However, in the presence of an intraspinal tumor, the effectiveness of these techniques will decrease, making these patients unsuitable
candidates. Neuraxial neurolytic therapy is ideal for patients
with advanced or terminal malignancy and unilateral somatic
pain
PATIENT PREPARATION
Once a definitive plan is established, informed
consent should be explained in detail to the patient, outlining
all the risks associated with the particular procedure. A thorough neurologic examination before any invasive
techniques are attempted is vital not only for assessing the
effectiveness, but it can provide a baseline assessment in
the event of any potential complications.
Before any neurolytic agents are used, it is advisable to perform a
diagnostic blockade with
a local anesthetic that reproduces the planned intervention. This diagnostic maneuver helps to confirm needle placement and can provide information
about the level of effectiveness of the neurolysis.
The choice of neurolytic
agent is based on
the location of needle placement, the ability of the patient to get in the required position, and the volume of injectate required
Baricity
may play a role in determining which neurolytic agent to use
for the patient.
Phenol vs. Ethanol
Phenol is a hyperbaric agent that would be
more appropriate for pelvic and saddle blocks compared with a hypobaric agent such as ethanol.
Ethyl alcohol injections perineurally are associated with
burning dysesthesias running along the course of the nerve. To alleviate this known effect, most practitioners inject a local
anesthetic preceding the use of ethyl alcohol.
The neurolytic action of alcohol is produced by
the extraction of
neural cholesterol, phospholipids, and cerebrosides, and the precipitation of mucopeptides. These actions result in sclerosis of the nerve fibers and myelin sheath, leading to demyelination
During neurolytic action of alcohol the basal lamina of the Schwann cell sheath remains intact, allowing for
new Schwann cell growth, thereby providing the framework for subsequent
nerve fiber growth. This framework encourages the regeneration of axons, but only if the cell bodies of these nerves are not completely destroyed.
Areas of demyelination can be seen in
posterior columns, Lissauer’s tract, and the dorsal root,
followed by Wallerian degeneration to the dorsal horn.
Intrathecal alcohol injection results in
rapid uptake of alcohol and variable injury to the surface of the spinal cord. Ethyl alcohol is quickly absorbed from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) so that only 10% of the initial dose
remains in the CSF after 10 min and only 4% after 30 min.
The rapid spread from the injection site of Intrathecal alcohol means
larger volumes are required than for phenol, which in
turn may result in local tissue damage
The use of ethanol as a neurolytic agent has been associated with
a disulfiram-like effect, known as acetaldehyde syndrome. The patients experienced flushing, hypotension,
tachycardia, and diaphoresis within 15 min of alcohol administration.
medications that may cause disulfiram-like effects after
peripheral neurolytic blocks with alcohol, such as
chloramphenicol,
beta-lactams, metronidazole, tolbutamide,
chlorpropamide, and disulfiram.
specific gravity of Ethyl alcohol and CSF
Ethyl alcohol has a
specific gravity of less than 0.8, and CSF has a specific
gravity of slightly greater than 1.0. Within the CSF, alcohol
is hypobaric and will move against gravity, “floating”
upward. Therefore, positioning of the patient is an
extremely important factor to consider when planning
the procedure.
The administration of ethanol for the purpose of neurolysis can have catastrophic consequences.
It has been associated with
both transient and permanent paraplegia in both celiac plexus and intrathecal blocks. It has been postulated that these effects are secondary to vasospasm of the spinal arteries by the direct action of alcohol.
Characteristics of Neurolytic Agents: Alcohol
Physical properties: Low water solubility Stability at room temperature: Unstable Concentration: 100% Diluent: None Relative to cerebral spinal fluid: Hypobaric Patient position: Lateral Added tilt: Semiprone Painful side: Uppermost Injection sensation: Burning pain Onset of neurolysis: Immediate Cerebrospinal fluid uptake ends: 30 min Full effect: 3-5 days