Chapter 7 Torts: Private Wrongs Flashcards
LAW OF TORTS
*DEFINING the duties and rights people have to each other.
*comes from Common Law of England.
*Latin - “to twist”
*concerns compensating victims for wrongful or unacceptable conduct and
sometimes public policy reasons.
*TL is a vehicle through which both claims for compensation by victims, and sometimes demands for punishment, can be administered.
WHAT IS A TORT
A private wrong* committed that injures another -victim- in person or property and for which society allows the legal remedy of monetary charges.
- other than breach of contract
- an injury from another
tortfeasor / joint tortfeasors
wrongdoer / two or more wrongdoers /who are liable for particular injuries
Three classes of torts
intentional
negligent
strict liability
intentional tort
purposely commits some act that injures the victim
difference between crimes and torts
Torts are Civil Law and not necessarily motivated by evil motivations
Crimes are Criminal Law
NEGLIGENCE
Carelessness; failing to act as a reasonable person under the same circumstances, thereby causing injury
Eight types of intentional torts
ASSAULT BATTERY INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF MENTAL DISTRESS DEFAMATION INVASION OF PRIVACY CONVERSION OR THEFT FRAUD BAD FAITH
ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE
- Is there a DUTY OF CARE
- duty of care breached through UNREASONABLE CONDUCT
- was the result of above breech an injury to the defendant
- was the breach of duty the cause of the victim’s injury
- was the injury unforeseeable by a reasonable person?
(“Is there any social policy under which the liability ought to be cut off? p 229)
Most torts arise from roles as consumers, commuters, employees.
TRUE
STRICT LIABILITY
A person is held responsible for harm to another without proof of fault.
*liability without fault
Examples of sources of injuries that invoke STRICT LIABILITY
inherently dangerous activities;
wild animals;
explosives;
sale of defective products
What proof is needed for strict liability?
An injury occurred and damages were suffered, and the injury was caused by a predictor act to which strict liability attaches, such as airplane crashes or defective consumer products.
The determination of absolute liability is a question of law for juries.
FALSE
The determination of absolute liability is a question of law for courts.
WHAT IS THE RESTATEMENT OF TORTS BALANCING TEST
*strict liability torts
A test of Abnormally Dangerous Activities
- a: existence of a high degree of rich of some harm to the person, land, chattel
- b: likelihood that the harm that results from it will be great
- c: inability to eliminate the risk by the exercise of reasonable care.
- d: extent to which the activity is not a matter of common usage.
- e: inappropriateness of the activity to the pace where it is carried on; and
- f: extent to which its value to the community is outweighed by its dangerous attributes.
RES IPSA LOQUITUR what is the literal translation
The Thing Speaks For Itself
What is the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur
- Inference of the defendant’s breach of duty
- when courts infer that duty was breached. (as opposed to the victim’s proof of such)
- The burden of proof shifts to the defendant, who must prove that he or she was not negligent.
Contributory Negligence
The negligence of a plaintiff that helped to cause a tort, and is usually barred from claiming damages if injured.
Assumption of Risk
When a plaintiff had knowledge of the dangerous conditions and voluntarily exposes him or herself to the particularly risk of injury.
BAD FAITH
intentional tort
The deliberate failure to fulfill some duty or contractual obligation owed to another.
- a purposeful failure to act on a promise or duty.
- a duty of good faith and fair dealing.
STATUTE OF REPOSE
A type of statute of limitations that specifies An absolute time during which cause of action must be brought to collect damages. The cuts the liability for injury after a specific amount of time.