Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Chapter 7 - Criminal Homicide > Flashcards

Chapter 7 - Criminal Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Criminal Homicide

A

The unjustified, unexcused killing of a human being

Types: Intentional Murder, Murder with provocation, depraved heart murder, intent to inflict grievous bodily injury, felony-murder, involuntary manslaughter, negligent homicide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Murder

A

MPC §210.2(a)-(b)
- Homicide is murder if the actor: Purposely or knowingly takes a life (intentionally) OR acts with extreme recklessness (deprave heart murder)

– Intent to kill: (express malice)Acted with intent

– Intent to inflict grievous bodily injury: (implied malice)unintentional killing + aggravation

– Depraved Heart/Gross or extreme recklessness: (implied malice) unintentional killing + aggravation
(Knoller)

MPC §210.02(1)(b)
- Extreme recklessness is presumed if homicide occurs during specified felonies (felony murder)

–Felony Murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Manslaughter

A

MPC §210.03 (1) (a)-(b): Homicide is manslaughter if a) the actor recklessly kills another OR b) if, under extreme emotional disturbance, the actor commits an act that would otherwise be murder

  • Provocation: (Heat of passion/voluntary manslaughter) Unlawful killing of another human being without malice
  • Misdemeanor Manslaughter: Intent to commit misdemeanor which a death occurs is a sufficient mental state for manslaughter

MPC §210.4: Homicide is negligent homicide when it is committed negligently (Hernandez)

-Negligent Manslaughter (Williams): gross negligence/criminal negligence/involuntary manslaughter; an intentional killing committed without due causation OR Lawful act done in unlawful manner without due causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

People v. Eulo

A

Life ends w/ loss of spontaneous brain function OR cardiorespiratory function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State v. Guthrie

A

1st degree murder is willful, deliberate and premeditated

Hatfield definition of premeditate/intent : intentional, deliberate and premeditated means the killing is done after a period of time for prior consideration

Time - will vary person to person BUT must be sufficient for the accused to be fully conscious of what he intended to do
– REJECTED THE “intent need only exist for an instant” instructions of Schrader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Midgett v. State

A

1st degree murder

    • State must prove premeditated and deliberate BRD
  • -W/o child abuse 1st degree murder statute from legislature; the state has to prove premeditation and deliberation no matter how heinous the facts are
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State v. Forrest

A

Proof of premeditation must be proved by circumstantial evidence:

1) want of provocation on the part of the victim
2) The conduct/statements of D before and after the killing
3) threats and declarations of D before and during the course of occurrence giving rise to victim’s death
4) pre-existing ill-will between parties
5) lethal blows after victim has been rendered helpless
6) brutality of the killing
7) Nature and number of the wounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Premeditation

A
  • usually 1st degree murder
  • time:
  • usually greater culpability, but not always (midgett; forrest)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Proof of Premeditation

A

Proof of premeditation must be proved by circumstantial evidence:

1) want of provocation on the part of the victim
2) The conduct/statements of D before and after the killing
3) threats and declarations of D before and during the course of occurrence giving rise to victim’s death
4) pre-existing ill-will between parties
5) lethal blows after victim has been rendered helpless
6) brutality of the killing
7) Nature and number of the wounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deadly Weapon Doctrine

A

When A intentionally uses a deadly weapon on B and kills him; it is presumed that A intended to kill B

** Can be rebutted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

People v. Morrin (note 1, pg 276)

A

Premeditation: to think about beforehand
Deliberation: to measure and evaluate the major facets of a choice or problem

**the time between the initial thought and ultimate actions should be long enough to afford a reasonable man time to take a second look at his response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MPC 210.2(2)

A

One degree of murder for all intentional killings!

–rejects premeditation!! NO DEGREES of murder!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MPC 210.2(2)

A

One degree of murder for all intentional killings!

–rejects premeditation!! NO DEGREES of murder!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule of Provocation

A
  • Provocation must be adequate
  • it must be calculated to inflame the passion of a reasonable man
  • Killing in heat of passion
  • Sudden – insufficient time to cool off
  • Causal connection between provocation and fatal act

Words alone cannot be adequate unless

1) They are accompanied by conduct indicating present intent and ability to cause bodily harm
2) (few jurisdictions) if words informed D of an event that, had he witnessed it, would be provocative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Girouard v. State

A

Rules of Provocation + words alone cannot be adequate

Adequate provocation is calculated to inflame the passion of a reasonable person and cause him to act for the moment from passion rather than reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Adequate Provocation

A

CL: provocation mitigates intentional killing to manslaughter

IF D reasonably believes injury exists even though it does not

traditional circumstances allowed: Extreme assault or battery on D, mutual combat, illegal arrest of D, Injury or serious abuse of D’s close relative, sudden discovery of spouse’s adultery

**NOT ALLOWED: Sex between victim and D’s sister, words, woman’s refusal of D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

People v. Casassa

A

Provision permits but does not require the finder of fact to mitigate based on EMED

— Reasonableness from the viewpoint of a person in the actor’s situation under the circumstances as he believes them to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Extreme Emotional Disturbance

A
  • Requires actors emotional distress be based on reasonable explanation or excuse
  • Preserves the essentially objective character of the inquiry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

MPC 210.3(1)(b)

A

Provocation/ Extreme mental or emotional disturbance

– murder is mitigated if D is acting under the influence of EM or ED for which there is a reasonable explanation

** REASONABLE is determined from the viewpoint of a person in D’s position under the circumstances as he believed them to be

    • provocation can mitigate BUT does not have to.
  • -MPC recognizes that it does not have to be immediate, time may increase EMED
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

MPC 210.3 (1)(a)

A

Involuntary Manslaughter (reckless manslaughter)

Criminal homicide constitutes manslaughter when it is committed recklessly
– committed recklessly means a killing for which the actor is reckless as to causing death and reckless as to the victim being human

21
Q

People v. Knoller

A
  • Implied Malice
  • Abandoned & Malignant heart

Focus on risk of death or risk of great bodily injury

22
Q

State v. Williams

A

negligence based on RPS regardless of ignorance/good faith
– RPS can be somewhat subjective

– If ordinary negligence is proximate cause of the death, D is guilty of statutory manslaughter

– ordinary negligence is failure to exercise ordinary care (RPS) necessary to make defense of excusable homicide.

23
Q

People v. Fuller

A

Felony Murder should not apply to petty non-violent felonies

All murder which is committed in the perpetration of a felony(listed in statute or @ CL) is murder in the first degree; STRICT LIABILITY

24
Q

People v. Howard

A

Determining whether a felony is inherently dangerous
– Howard Test: Can the felony be committed without creating a substantial risk that someone will e killed?

Ex. pg 347-348

25
Q

People v. Smith

A

NO F-M if felony inherently included risk of death/assaultive nature

  • if homicide results from conduct for independent felonious purpose as opposed to a single course of action with a single purpose (merge)

– if we apply f-m here, it would extend it beyond it’s rational function

26
Q

State V. Sophophone

A

If killing is committed by a non-felon during a felony, apply Apparent Agency doctrine (or proximate cause – dissent)

– FMR not applicable b/c killing didn’t take place in futherance

27
Q

Gregg v. Georgia

A

DP is not always unconstitutional – the Georgia scheme (jury guidance, bifurcated trial, appellate review and proportionality review) fixes the arbitrariness

28
Q

McCleskey V. Kemp

A

In order to use statistics to prove violation of equal protection clause, D must prove decision makers/legislature IN HIS CARE acted with discriminatory purpose

** it’s not good enough to show that the system is flawed but that it affected D directly

29
Q

Intent to Inflict Grievous Bodily Injury

A
  • Intent to inflict serious bodily injury can be adequate mens read for murder
    • To hold D liable for deaths that occur under circumstances that involved great risk (intending serious bodily injury)
30
Q

MPC §210.2

A

–Criminal homicide constitutes murder when:
— It is committed purposely or knowingly OR
—It is committed recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.
(compare to CL depraved heart/intent to inflict…)
** MPC gives no significance to intent to inflict…

— Such recklessness and indifference presumed if death occurs during certain crimes (compare to CL felony murder)

31
Q

State v. Hernandez

A
  • state had to prove D acted with criminal negligence and was the proximate cause of death
    • Irrelevant evidence (ex. bumper stickers) if it does not logically tend to prove or disprove a fact in issue
32
Q

MPC §210.3

A
  • -Criminal homicide constitutes manslaughter when:
  • –It is committed recklessly OR
  • –A homicide would otherwise be murder is committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance for which there is reasonable (under circumstances as D believes them to be) excuse
33
Q

Involuntary Manslaughter

A

State must prove that D acted with criminal negligence and caused the victim’s death
– Gross negligence is essential (breach had to amount to more than ordinary or simple negligence)

34
Q

MPC 2.02(5)

A

if negligence is required and a higher standard can be proven, then the higher state of mind (P, K, or R) can be substituted

– Prejudice is a limitation to substituting a state of mind

35
Q

MPC 2.02(5)

A

if negligence is required and a higher standard can be proven, then the higher state of mind (P, K, or R) can be substituted

– Prejudice is a limitation to substituting a state of mind

36
Q

Criminal Negligence

A

requires jury to find negligence so gross as to merit damages AND punishment

37
Q

MPC §210.2

A

One is guilty of murder if death results from conduct during the commission or attempted o

38
Q

“In Furtherance”/ Res Gestae Requirement

A

“in the course of…” - crime must be furthered

Factors that determine: 1) Time 2) Place 3) Causal Connection

– How long does a crime last? Once the felon has reached a place of temporary safety, the impact of FM ends

Coincidental death occurring during the commission is not enough for FM – The death must have been cause by an act done in furtherance of a felony

39
Q

Apparent Agency v. Proximate Cause

A

Apparent Agency: F-M will not apply if the person who directly caused the death was a NON FELON

Proximate Cause: felon may be held responsible for murder for a killing committed by a non -felon SO LONG AS THE FELON SET THE COURSE OF ACTIONS THAT CAUSED THE DEATH
–D had role in starting the conduct that caused the killing

40
Q

Co Felon Liability

A

All parties liable for deviations from common place which are foreseeable consequence of the plan

41
Q

Co Felon Affirmative Defense

A

it IS a defense if D wasn’t the only participant that

  • D did not intend to kill
  • D wasn’t armed
  • D has no reason to believe co felon was armed
  • D has no reason to believe anyone intended conduct likely to cause death or injury

(Very Narrow)

42
Q

Misdemeanor-Manslaughter

A

A person is liable for involuntary manslaughter when he causes the death of another during the commission of a misdemeanor; even though the actor did not act with criminal negligence necessary for involuntary manslaughter.

– must be committing a misdemeanor during killing; despite lack of intent, will be manslaughter

43
Q

Felony Murder Doctrine

A

Any death occurring during the course of a felony is murder – as long as death is consequence of the felony

** it is murder even if death may be accidental, unintended or unforeseeable

– STRICT LIABILITY – relieves state’s burden of proving intent (recklessness is presumed MPC §210.02(1)(b))

44
Q

Criticism of the Felony Murder Rule

A
  • Excessive punishment for the culpability (fuller)
  • you can’t deter unintended acts
  • not retributive
45
Q

Approval of Felony Murder Rule

A
  • will deter negligent and accidental killings by encouraging felons to take care
  • Will deter predicate felony b/c strict liability
  • RELIEVES THE STATE’S BURDEN OF SHOWING INTENT
46
Q

Limitations on Felony Murder Rule

A
  • Inherently Dangerous
  • Indep. Felony and Merger
  • In Furtherance of…
47
Q

Howard Test on Inherently Dangerous

A

– Abstract objective standard; NOT judged by the particular facts of the case

Can the felony be committed without substantial risk someone will be killed?

48
Q

MPC §210.2

A

One is guilty of murder if death results from conduct during the commission or attempted commission of a felony

49
Q

Furman v. Georgia

A

Death penalty found unconstitutional b/c unfettered discretion (by jury) is arbitrary and capricious

Criminal Law (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions