CHAPTER 7,8,9 Flashcards

1
Q

is the variable (antecedent condition) an experimenter intentionally manipulates.

A

independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

are the values of the IV created by the experimenter.

A

levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

is the outcome measure the experimenter uses to assess the change in behavior produced by the independent variable.

A

dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

specifies the exact meaning of a variable in an experiment by defining it in terms of observable operations, procedures, and measurements.

A

operational definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

specifies the exact procedure for creating values of the independent variable.

A

experimental operational definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

specifies the exact procedure for measuring the dependent variable.

A

measured operational definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

assigns items to two or more distinct categories that can be named using a shared feature, but does not measure their magnitude.

A

nominal scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

measures the magnitude of the dependent variable using ranks, but does not assign precise values.

A

ordinal scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

measures the magnitude of the dependent variable using equal intervals between values with no absolute zero point.

A

interval scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

measures the magnitude of the dependent variable using equal intervals between values and an absolute zero.

A

ratio scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

refers to the consistency of experimental operational definitions and measured operational definitions.

A

Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

is the degree to which observers agree in their measurement of the behavior.

A

Interrater reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

means the degree to which a person’s scores are consistent across two or more administrations of a measurement procedure.

A

Test-retest reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

measures the degree to which different parts of an instrument (questionnaire or test) that are designed to measure the same variable achieve consistent results.

A

Interitem reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

means the operational definition accurately manipulates the independent variable or measures the dependent variable.

A

Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

is the degree to which the validity of a manipulation or measurement technique is self-evident.

A

Face validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

means how accurately a measurement procedure samples the content of the dependent variable.

A

Content validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

means how accurately a measurement procedure predicts future performance.

A

Predictive validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

is how accurately an operational definition represents a construct.

A

Construct validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

is the degree to which changes in the dependent variable across treatment conditions were due to the independent variable.

A

Internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

occurs when an extraneous variable systematically changes across the experimental conditions.

A

Confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

occurs when an event outside the experiment threatens internal validity by changing the dependent variable.

A

History threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

is produced when physical or psychological changes in the subject threaten internal validity by changing the DV.

A

Maturation threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

is when changes in the measurement instrument or measuring procedure threatens internal validity.

A

Instrumentation threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

threat occurs when subjects are assigned to conditions on the basis of extreme scores, the measurement procedure is not completely reliable, and subjects are retested using the same procedure to measure change on the dependent variable.

A

Statistical regression threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

occurs when individual differences are not balanced across treatment conditions by the assignment procedure.

A

Selection threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

occurs when subjects drop out of experimental conditions at different rates.

A

Subject mortality threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

occur when a selection threat combines with at least one other threat (history, maturation, statistical regression, subject mortality, or testing).

A

Selection interactions

29
Q

This section provides the reader with sufficient detail (who, what, when, and how) to exactly replicate your study.

A

Method section

30
Q

is appropriate when the equipment used in a study was unique or specialized, or when we need to explain the capabilities of more common equipment so that the reader can better evaluate or replicate the experiment.

A

Apparatus section

31
Q

are aspects of the testing situation that need to be controlled

A

Physical variables

32
Q

completely removes extraneous physical variables from the experimental situation (e.g., soundproofing a room).

A

Elimination

33
Q

controls extraneous physical variables by keeping all aspects of the treatment conditions identical, except for the independent variable.

A

Constancy of conditions

34
Q

are aspects of the relationships between subjects and experimenters that can influence experimental results.

A

Social variables

35
Q

are cues within the experimental situation that demand or elicit specific participant responses.

A

Demand characteristics

36
Q

in this experiment, subjects are not told their treatment condition.

A

single-blind experiment

37
Q

is when a subject receives an inert treatment and improves because of positive expectancies.

A

placebo effect

38
Q

is a false plausible explanation of the experimental procedures to disguise the research hypothesis from the subjects.

A

cover story

39
Q

is any behavior by the experimenter that can confound the experiment.

A

Experimenter bias

40
Q

is the phenomenon in which experimenters treat subjects differently based on their expectations and their resulting actions influence subject performance.

A

Rosenthal effect

41
Q

Other names of Rosenthal Effect

A

Pygmalion effect and self-fulfilling prophecy

42
Q

control both demand characteristics and experimenter bias, since both the experimenter and subjects are blinded.

A

Double-blind experiments

43
Q

are more sociable, score higher in social desirability, hold more liberal social and political attitudes, are less authoritarian, and score higher on intelligence tests than no volunteers.

A

Volunteers

44
Q

are extraneous variables produced by experimental procedures created by the research setting environment, like assignment of participants to conditions.

A

Context variables

45
Q

When we allow subjects to sign up for experiments whose titles differ in their appeal that could result in a biased sample threatening _______

A

external validity

46
Q

details an experimenter’s plan for testing a hypothesis.

47
Q

A researcher mainly selects an experimental design on the basis of three factors

A
  1. The number of independent variables in the hypothesis.
  2. The number of treatment conditions needed to fairly test the hypothesis
  3. Whether the same subjects are used in each of the treatment conditions.
48
Q

in this design, a subject participates in only one condition of the experiment.

A

between-subjects design

49
Q

determines whether we can generalize our results to the entire population from which the sample was drawn.

A

representativeness

50
Q

increases an experiment’s external validity.

A

Random sampling

51
Q

is a statistical estimate of the size or magnitude of a treatment effect.

A

Effect size

52
Q

determines the number of subjects required to detect a treatment effect.

A

Effect size

53
Q

Using these charts, researchers determine the number of subjects required for an expected effect size

A

power charts

54
Q

involves the creation of two separate groups of subjects.

A

two group design

55
Q

Two versions of the two group design are

A
  1. The two independent groups design and

2. Two matched groups design.

56
Q

A design where there is one IV with two levels and subjects are randomly assigned to one of the two conditions. This design includes:

A
  1. Experimental Group-Control Group design and

2. Two-Experimental Groups design.

57
Q

involves assigning subjects to conditions so that each subject has an equal chance of participating in each condition.

A

Random assignment

58
Q

presents a value of the independent variable.

A

experimental condition

59
Q

presents a zero level of the independent variable.

A

control condition

60
Q

this group receives a level of the IV

A

experimental group

61
Q

this group receives the same procedures, but receives no treatment.

A

control group

62
Q

This design is appropriate if there is one independent variable with two levels and if we can assume that randomization will control extraneous variables.

A

two experimental groups design

63
Q

is used to create groups that are equivalent on potentially confounding subject variables.

64
Q

is a between-subjects design with more than two levels of an independent variable.

A

multiple groups design

65
Q

in this group design, we randomly assign subjects to one of the treatment conditions.

A

multiple independent groups design

66
Q

is a process for randomly assigning equal numbers of subjects to conditions.

A

Block randomization

67
Q

is a trial run of the experiment that uses a few subjects.

A

pilot study

68
Q

these can all help determine the number of treatments.

A

hypothesis, prior research, pilot study results, and practical limits