Chapter 7 Flashcards
Criminal Wrongs
are those activities that are regulated by the criminal code of Canada or federal statutes
Civil Wrongs
torts) are those acts, either intentional or unintentional, that cause harm or injury to another person on their property
Tort
is a private, civil matter between the victim and the offender (victim applies to court for compensation)
Crime
is a public matter between the accused and the state (state prosecutes offender for punishment and protection)
Rule of Law
no one is above the law and that all people are equal before the law
Certainty of Law
law must be certain not vague, any vagueness or uncertainty in the law must be interpreted to the benefit of the accused
Procedural protections of the charter
all other laws must comply with its provisions, in particular sections 7-14 ( life, liberty and security of person, security from unreasonable search and seizure etc)
Actus Rea
is the physical action that constitutes the crime, and there must be some evidence of that unlawful conduct
Determining Actus Reus
- Omissions- failure to act ( committing a crime by NOT doing something)
- Automatism- if a person is not conscious of what he is doing there is no actus reus
- Causation- did the action of the accused result in the injury or death?
Mens Rea
is the requirement that a guilty mind be behind the act that constitutes the crime
Motive
reason why the accused committed the act
Subjective Test ( looking at intent)
takes into account the personal circumstances of the accused and seeks to determine what was actually in his or her mind when the act occurred
Objective Test (Looking at intent)
expected by society and is based on the assumption that the person was or ought to have been more aware of that standard
Mistake of Fact
Defence used to show there was no intent ( taking goods that are not yours however you were not aware of that
three categories of offences
- General-
- Strict Liability-
- Absolute Liability
General ( Offence)
criminal Offences in which the prosecution must prove mens rea
Strict Liability
public welfare or regulatory offences where the crown must prove the act but the accused must prove a mistake of fact was based on a reasonable belief
Absolute Liability
the crown does not have to prove intention, the proof of the unlawful act is sufficient to convict and the defence of mistake is not available
Burden of Proof
Beyond a reasonable Doubt ( because the accused is considered innocent until proven guilty)
Ignorance of the Law is No excuse
NO EXCUSE
Admissible Evidence
evidence that the court determines has been legally acquired