chapter 7 Flashcards
mind-brain problem
issue of how the mind is related to the brain; three main views: dualism, materialism and functionalism
mind-brain in functionalism
the mind is indeed realised in a brain, but that it could be copied to any other brain, just like information on a computer can be copied to other machines
mind-brain in materialism
the mind is nothing but a by-product of the biological processes taking place in a particular brain
mind-brain in dualism
the mind (or the soul) is something independent of the body.
view about the relationship between the mind and brain that considers them as two different realms; in general the mind is seen as immaterial and in control of human behaviour (free will)
mind
aggregate of faculties humans (and animals) have to perceive, feel, think, remember and want
dualism
The soul is what gives people their purpose and values in life. It usually aims for the good, but can be tempted and seduced by evil forces.
According to Descartes, humans were composed of a divine soul in a sophisticated body (sometimes referred to as ‘the ghost in the machine’).
Just like Plato, Descartes believed that the soul brought divine information to humans and, therefore, that people had innate knowledge, which they could recover through deductive reasoning.
ambivalence around dualism
second half of the nineteenth century
emphasis religions placed on the immortality of the soul
the connection of the soul to a divine entity
its independence of the body.
At the same time, they were unwilling to reduce the human mind to nothing but brain tissue
consciousness
word referring to the private, first- person experiences an individual lives through; contains all the mental states a person is aware of; part of the mind that can be examined with introspection
conditions of free will
- The agent must have been able to do otherwise. Free will only exists when there is a choice.
- The act must originate in the agent, not in some external force.
- The act must be the outcome of rational deliberation (acts that are erratic and unpredictable are not seen as free).
the interaction problem
how to explain the mechanisms by which an inde- pendent mind (or soul) can influence the body.
monads (meaning)
the universe could be compared it to a living organism.
The building blocks were not material particles, but energy-laden and soul- invested units, called monads
monads
- Simple monads
formed the bodies of all matter (organic and inorganic). They had some type of unconscious and unorganised perception, and they were motivated by a tendency to keep in line with the existing, pre-established harmony of the universe. - Sentient monads
present in all living organisms, but not in inorganic material. They had capacities for feeling pleasure and pain, and for the voluntary focusing of attention. However, they lacked the ability to reason about their experiences. - Rational monads
the conscious minds of humans. They possessed the capacity of apperception, the faculty not only to perceive but also to reflect upon what is perceived. - The supreme monad
controlled and motivated all other monads. This in Leibniz’s eyes was the omniscient and omnipotent God of Christian religion.
animistic substances
Phlogiston:
a substance that was believed to make materials flammable before the chemical processes of combustion were understood
vital force:
animistic substance thought to be present in living matter before the chemical and biological differences between living and non-living matter were understood
materialism
view about the relationship between the mind and brain that considers the mind as the brain in operation; predicts that the mind de- pends on the specific brain in which it is realized; denies the existence of free-will
folk psychology
unsubstantiated convictions of lay people, similar to ‘folk medicine’ and ‘folk science’, which are also incoherent collections of beliefs and superstitions that are void of empirical verification.