Chapter 6: Sentencing Flashcards
Overview
1.1 The Sentencing Code
The ‘Sentencing Code’ is a consolidation of existing sentencing procedure law. It brings together
over 50 pieces of primary legislation relating to sentencing procedure into one single Sentencing Act 2020 (‘SA 2020’).
Parts 2 to 13 of the SA 2020 make up a code called the ‘Sentencing Code’ (the ‘Code’). Unless referring specifically to sections 1 or 2 of the SA 2020, it is acceptable to refer to either the
SA 2020 or the Code. As well as the Code, courts also refer to sentencing guidelines published by the Sentencing
Council.
1.2 Types of sentence
There are a variety of disposals available to a court when dealing with an offender; all of which meet, to a greater or lesser degree, the principles of sentencing. They fall into custodial and non-custodial sentences. One of the main advantages of the SA 2020 is that it brings the wide range of disposals together ‘under one roof’ as it were
1.3 Purposes of sentencing (adult)
When determining the proportionate sentence to be imposed, the court will have regard to the various purposes of sentencing. Section 57 SA 2020- In cases involving those aged 18 and over (at the date of conviction) the court must have regard to:
(a) The punishment of offenders,
(b) The reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence),
(c) The reform and rehabilitation of offenders,
(d) The protection of the public, and
(e) The making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences. The purposes are given equal weight though in a particular case some may be more important
than others
1.4 Approach to sentencing
The mechanics of how a court sentences an offender is essentially the same irrespective of which
court is dealing. The only key differences are:
* The availability of certain sentences; and
* The limits to the powers of the magistrates’ and youth courts.
In order to decide both the type and length of any particular sentence, the court must assess the seriousness of the case before it. To do so, it will refer to the sentencing guidelines.
1.5 Sentencing procedure
Sentencing happens once a defendant is convicted. This occurs either by the defendant entering a guilty plea or being found guilty after a trial.
The magistrates’ court, youth court and Crown Court are all courts of first instance with powers of sentence. It is important to appreciate the difference between the maximum sentence which can be imposed for a specific offence and the maximum sentence which can be imposed by a particular
court for that offence
1.5 Sentencing procedure
This means that statute also allows for defendants, where necessary and appropriate, to be committed for sentence to the Crown Court which has greater powers. Section 14 SA 2020 for example, provides that magistrates can commit an adult for sentence to the Crown Court for offences triable either way where greater sentencing powers are required.
1.6 Powers of the courts
The following tables summarise which courts can sentence depending on the type of offence involved:
* Summary only
* Either-way
* Indictable only
1.7 On what basis is the defendant being sentenced?
For the purposes of this section, let’s use a simple example. The defendant is charged with a single count of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (s.47 Offences against the Person Act 1861). The prosecution alleges that he punched the complainant in the face twice. The complainant fell to the ground. The defendant is alleged to have kicked the
complainant twice in the ribs whilst the complainant remained on the ground
1.7 On what basis is the defendant being sentenced?
Let us assume that the defendant’s instructions are that he did assault the complainant, and he accepts that this did cause actual bodily harm, but that he takes issue with the facts asserted by the prosecution. If this is his position, he would need to:
* Enter a guilty plea, but on a written basis, the prosecution would indicate whether they viewed the basis as acceptable; if accepted
* The court will then proceed to consider whether this basis is an acceptable one; and
* The court will consider whether or not a Newton hearing is required.
1.8 Newton hearings
Where a defendant pleads guilty on a basis that will make a material difference to sentence, the
court must hold a Newton hearing to decide the factual basis upon which it should pass sentence (R v Newton).
What happens at a Newton hearing?
1.8 Newton hearings
In the magistrates’ court, a Newton hearing is presided over by magistrates or a District Judge much like a regular trial. In the Crown Court it takes place without a jury. This is one of the limited
number of occasions where a Crown Court Judge acts as the arbiter of both law and fact. A Newton hearing is an exception to the rule that where a defendant enters a guilty plea there is
no ‘trial’ phase to the process
1.8 Newton hearings
The prosecution makes an opening speech and calls evidence in the usual way and their witnesses can be cross-examined by the defence. The defendant is able to give evidence and call witnesses if they so wish. Both parties are entitled to address the judge by way of a closing speech.
At the conclusion of the hearing the court must decide whether the prosecution has proved its version of the facts beyond reasonable doubt. If it has, the defendant will be sentenced on the prosecution version of the facts. If it has failed to prove their factual basis to that standard, the
defendant will be sentenced on the defence version of the facts as set out in their basis of plea
1.8 Newton hearings
If the prosecution is able to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt and the defendant sentenced on their version of the facts, a further consequence for the defendant is that they lose
some of the credit that they receive for pleading guilty. The Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea guideline says that the reduction which would have been available at the stage of proceedings the plea was indicated should normally be halved. Where witnesses are called, it may be appropriate to further decrease the reduction. The rationale must be that the defendant has used up some court time that otherwise would have been saved due to their plea and/or that
witnesses who would have been spared from giving evidence due to their plea instead had to come to court and give evidence at the Newton hearing.
1.9 Totality
When sentencing for more than one offence, a court must consider what the total sentence should be and arrive at one that is just and proportionate. This is not as simple as adding the two (or more) sentences together, the judge will consider whether consecutive or concurrent sentences are more appropriate in the circumstances. Where the various offences arise out of the same facts it will usually be appropriate to pass concurrent sentences for each, and where they arise out of different facts, consecutive sentences are likely to be passed.
1.10 Deferring sentence
A court can defer sentence for up to six months, the idea being that the defendant is allowed this
time to prove to the court that D has either ‘changed’ or that the offence was an absolute ‘oneoff’ and thus allowing D the ability to present to the court at the end of the deferral period in a
much better light, and often, receive a lighter sentence as a result.
1.10 Deferring sentence
The deferral period cannot be extended save for where the magistrates’ court defers sentence for a period, at the end of which they commit to the Crown Court for sentence, the Crown Court then has the option of deferring for a further six month period.
1.11 Indications of sentence
There are two formal procedures for seeking an indication of sentence in the event of a guilty plea. One in each court:
1.11.1 Magistrates’ court
The offence is either-way and the court has accepted jurisdiction during the allocation process. At this stage, D is entitled ask for an indication of what their sentence would be were they to
remain in the magistrates’ court and plead guilty. The court does not have to give an indication of sentence but, if it does it can only say whether
the sentence would be a custodial or a non-custodial sentence. Only binding if D then pleads guilty.
1.11.2 Crown Court: Goodyear indication
D can ask for an indication of the sentence either before the PTPH or at any stage of the proceedings before the jury return their verdict. Before asking for an indication D must:
(a) Either accept the prosecution facts or a written basis of plea must be agreed by the parties
and the court
(b) Give clear instructions to their counsel that D wishes to ask for an advance indication of
sentence. The giving of an indication is discretionary and it remains the decision of the judge whether to
give one or not
1.12 Summary
This section considered the principles of sentencing contained in the Sentencing Act 2020:
* The purpose of sentencing
* Sentencing powers in both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court
* The purpose of Newton hearings.
* Totality of sentence
* Indications of sentence
2 Sentencing: Determining sentence
2.1 Seriousness
In order to decide on the appropriate sentence, the court will consider the Sentencing Code 2020
alongside any relevant sentencing guidelines. The court must determine the seriousness of the offence.
The starting point to determine seriousness is to consider culpability and harm.
Section 63 SA 2020: Where a court is considering the seriousness of any offence, it must consider
(a) The offender’s culpability in committing the offence, and
(b) Any harm which the offence (i) caused, (ii) was intended to cause, or (iii) might foreseeably
have caused.
2.1.1 Thresholds
Where appropriate the court must consider whether either statutory threshold has been passed to
justify imposing a custodial or community order.
Section 230 SA 2020:
(a) The court must not pass a custodial sentence unless it is of the opinion that:
(i) The offence, or
(ii) The combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was so
serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence’
Section 204 SA 2020:
(b) The court must not make a community order unless it is of the opinion that:
(i) The offence, or
(ii) The combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was serious enough to warrant the making of such an order.
2.1.2 Culpability
Culpability is essentially blameworthiness and is assessed with reference to the offender’s role, level of intention and/or premeditation and the extent and sophistication of planning.
The mere presence of a factor that is inherent in the offence should not be used in assessing culpability – so for example, intention to cause serious harm is a necessary element in a section 18 OAPA. What would increase culpability might be how the injuries were inflicted eg with a weapon.
2.1.3 Harm
Harm is an assessment of the damage caused to the victim. So, in an assault it is a consideration of how injured the victim was and whether the assault was sustained or repeated.
In a theft it will be assessed by the financial loss resulting from the theft and any additional harm suffered by the victim or anyone else, for example injury or emotional distress
2.2 Sentencing Guidelines
Every court must follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the offender’s case unless
the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so. Sentencing guidelines are available for most of the significant offences sentenced in the magistrates’ court Sentencing guidelines for use in the magistrates’ courts and for a wide range of offences in the Crown Court Sentencing guidelines for use in Crown Court There are also overarching guidelines on general sentencing issues and principles such as
Sentencing children and young people
2.2 Sentencing Guidelines
Where no offence-specific sentencing guideline exists, courts will refer to the General guideline: overarching principles. Judges in the Crown Court might also refer to Court of Appeal judgments to look at how sentences have been reached for similar cases.
The General guideline can also be used with offence-specific guidelines where factors are not covered, and overarching guidance is required.
2.3 What happens at a sentencing hearing?
2.3.1 Prosecution
The duties of a prosecutor extend to reminding the court of the following:
* Any previous convictions
* Any ancillary orders that the prosecution seeks (eg costs, compensation, restraining order)
* Any relevant sentencing guidelines
* Any general sentencing issues necessary to ensure that a lawful sentence is passed (eg the
mandatory minimum sentence provisions)
* Any victim impact statement which has been produced. It is not the role of the prosecution to tell the court or to suggest to the court what the ultimate sentence may be.
2.3.2 Defence
As with the prosecutor, the defence are under a general duty to ensure that a lawful sentence is passed. Legal representatives must ensure that what they put forward is consistent with their instructions and their duties not to mislead the court. The defence may ask for a pre-sentence report should they want one. It is, however, more
common to ask for one before the prosecution goes through the process of opening the case. If a pre-sentence report is ordered by the court the case will ordinarily be adjourned for a period for this to happen. Pre sentence reports can be ordered at the Plea and Trial preparation hearing or even at the time of sending.
2.3.3 Pre-sentence reports
Section 30 SA 2020 states that a court must obtain a pre-sentence report before passing a custodial or community sentence, unless it considers it unnecessary to do so. The report is to assist the court in determining the most suitable method of dealing with an offender. Probation input is needed before a community order can be imposed to assess the
defendant’s suitability for any programmes. The probation officer will meet the defendant and discuss the offence and the defendant’s attitude towards it.
2.3.4 Other reports
Sometimes other reports will be obtained, either by order of the court or by the defence. These can include medical reports (if the defendant has a physical condition) or a psychiatric
report. If the court is contemplating a sentence pursuant to the Mental Health Act 1983 then it must receive evidence from two medical practitioners stating that in their opinion the defendant is
suffering from a mental disorder.
2.4 The Code: Approach to sentencing
The Code confirms the approach the court should take:
(a) Determine offence seriousness (ie harm and culpability).
(b) Consider aggravating factors (ie those increasing seriousness), both statutory (eg previous relevant convictions, on bail, racial, religious, disability or sexual aggravation) and other nonstatutory matters (eg alcohol, abuse of power, breach of trust).
(c) Consider mitigating factors (ie those reducing seriousness), eg those relating to the offence, such as provocation or excessive self-defence; and those relating to the offender, such as positive good character, offender’s vulnerability, mental health, remorse or other personal mitigation
2.4 The Code: Approach to sentencing
(d) Consider any assistance given to the prosecution.
(e) Consider the appropriate reduction for any guilty plea.
(f) Consider totality.
(g) Appropriate ancillary orders must be considered eg compensation, disqualification,
forfeiture, restraining order, costs, surcharge, Criminal Courts Charge
2.5 Determining sentence
2.5.1 Category
For most offences, the sentencing guidelines set out the appropriate range of sentence based on:
(a) Greater culpability and greater harm.
(b) Greater culpability and lesser harm, or greater harm and lesser culpability.
(c) Lesser culpability and lesser harm.
The highest level of offence category would be 1, the lowest 3, and the middle category 2.
The guideline will then provide a sentence starting point and range for each category.
Example
Let us consider an offence of wounding with intent (s 18 OAPA 1861).
V and D were in a house where drugs are bought and used. D alleged his drugs had been stolen and became very aggressive. When V refused to be strip searched D stabbed her in the thigh. She attempted to grab the knife and suffered deep cuts to her fingers as well as a penetrating wound
to her thigh. D fled the scene leaving V bleeding. D has previous for drugs.
The appropriate category here is Category 2. The use of a knife indicates higher culpability
2.5.2 Aggravating and mitigating factors
Once the category has been determined the judge will have a starting point and range of
sentence. Aggravating and mitigating factors will then result in an upward or downward adjustment from the starting point.
Common aggravating factors
Statutory factors
- Previous conviction(s), particularly where a pattern of repeat offending is disclosed
- Offence committed whilst on bail for other offences
- Offence was racially or religiously aggravated
- Offence motivated by, or demonstrating, hostility to the victim based on his sexual orientation
(or presumed sexual orientation) or on the victim’s disability (or presumed disability) - Commission of an offence while under the influence of alcohol or drugs
- Planning of an offence
Statutory factors
- Offenders operating in groups or gangs
- ‘Professional’ offending
- Commission of the offence for financial gain (where this is not inherent in the offence itself)
- High level of profit from the offence
- An attempt to conceal or dispose of evidence
- Failure to respond to previous sentences
- Offence committed whilst on licence
Statutory factors
An attempt to conceal or dispose of evidence
* Failure to respond to previous sentences
* Offence committed whilst on licence
* Offence motivated by hostility towards a minority group, or a member or members of it
* Use of a weapon to frighten or injure victim
* Multiple victims
* Deliberate and gratuitous violence or damage to property, over and above what is needed to carry out the offence