Chapter 6 Con Law Part 2 Flashcards
Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments to the Constitution.
The First Amendment
Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the freedom to assemble and petition the government.
Pure Speech
(words) are verbal statements or things that are written in a book or electronically.
Symbolic Speech
Physical actions that express a point of view.
Obscenity
Materials that lack any socially redeeming value that is not protected by the 1st amendment. Obscene materials can be banned!
The Miller Test
The three prong test used by the courts to judge obscenity from Miller v. California
- It depicts or describes sexual conduct that is potentially offensive to local community standards
- Taken as a whole, the work appeals to a prurient interest (lustful, desirable)
- Lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value
Indecent Content
Portrays sexual or excretory organs or activities in a way that does not meet the three-prong test for obscenity. Has some protection under the Constitution.
Profane Content
Grossly offensive language that is considered a public nuisance. Has some protection under the Constitution.
Hate Speech
Expression of hatred for or violence against a specific minority group or other protected classes not constitutionally protected.
Penalty Enhancement
Since hate speech is not constitutionally protected, penalty enhancement increases criminal penalty someone faces for demonstrating symbolic speech in a hateful or threatening manner.
Limits of Expression
A balancing test between the government’s interest vs. effect on free speech.
Clear and Present Danger Test
Does the gravity of the harm, discounted by its probability justify an invasion of free speech.
Time and Place Restrictions
Restrictions that limit protected expression to certain times and places. It has to be content neutral and requires a permit or license.
Laws Limiting The Right of Expression Must Be
- Narrowly Written
- Not limit the right to expression more than is clearly justified by the Government’s interest.
If States Capture Both Protected and Unprotected Speech
It is overbroad and therefore unconstitutional.