Chapter 6 Flashcards

1
Q

In what situations do law enforcement’s special needs justify stopping an automobile without reasonable suspicion?

A

Warrantless stops of automobiles are permitted at international borders and sobriety checkpoints (unless barred within a specific state by its own supreme court) or when there is reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or other wrongdoing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an exigent circumstance?

A

An urgent situation in which evidence might be destroyed, a suspect might escape, or the public would be endangered if police took the time to seek a warrant for a search or an arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What two elements must be present for valid consent to permit a warrantless search?

A

Voluntary consent by a person with proper authority to consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Carroll v. United States

A

May search for a car whenever there is a probable cause to believe it contains contraband

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Maryland v. Wilson

A

May order passengers to exit vehicle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cupp v. Murphy

A

exigent circumstance, a guy comes into the police officers, with blood under nails and police searched him bc they had evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brown v. Mississippi

A

Convictions of murder that rest solely upon confessions shown to have been extorted by officers of the State by the torture of the accused are void under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Escobedo v. Illinois

A

Hid Escobedo from his lawyer, can’t question suspect without a lawyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Massiah v. United States

A

Right to an attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

A

as soon as the investigation of a crime begins to focus on a particular suspect and that person is taken into custody, the so-called Miranda warnings must be read aloud before questioning can begin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the “public safety” exception?

A

Officers can ask questions of suspects in custody without first providing Miranda warnings when public safety would be threatened by their taking the time to supply the warnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How have police officers adapted their practices in light of Miranda?

A

Officers ask questions before suspects are in custody; pretend to befriend or empathize with suspects being questioned, and misinform suspects about the existence of evidence demonstrating their guilt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a stop

A

A momentary interference with someone’s liberty must have “reasonable suspicion”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an arrest and what does it need to be based on

A

A significant deprivation of liberty, must be based on probable clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly