Chapter 50-Behavioural Ecology Flashcards
Behavioural Ecology
study of the behavioural adaptations that evolved in response to ecological selection pressures
Proximate (or mechanistic) causation
explains how actions occur
Ultimate (or evolutionary) causation
explains why actions occur
-based on natural selection. Behaviour is a part of phenotype
EX: Do male redback spiders benefit from being eaten by their mates?
- The male actively solicits his own consumption, and females never eat males that do not somersault onto their jaws
- This allows him to insert two sperm packets into female sperm receptacles
How is the process with these spiders done?
Before a male mates, an abdominal constriction forms and protects his heart and other vital organs.
- As a result, he survives the attack long enough to insert his second sperm package, ↑ the number of spiderlings
(can transfer twice as many sperm)
- more successful at plugging the receptacles of their mates, preventing other males from inserting additional sperm
EX: Argentine ant behaviour
In their native range, the ants live in colonies and defend territories by fighting with neighbours
In S California, ants show no aggression, move among adjacent nest, and thus form “supercolonies”
Proximate Cause of argentine ants
ants identify each other via scent - hydrocarbon tags
- This scent is genetically determined, but the ants have almost no genetic variation in this allele, so an ant can’t tell if another is from its colony or not, but see native ants, with unfamiliar scents, as enemies
Ultimate causes of argentine ants
Supercolonies make Argentinian ants superior competitors and therefore the lack of diversity is adaptive in S. California
- low genetic diversity has its dangers: If the supercolony faces a pathogen, the entire colony may collapse
Fixed-action patterns (FAPs)
highly inflexible, stereotypical behaviour patterns
Learning
enduring change in behaviour that results from a specific experience (flexible)
Innate behaviour
requires no learning (fixed)
Fitness trade-offs
compromises balancing costs and benefits
Cost–benefit analysis
behavioural decisions are measured in terms of their impact on fitness
2 things about cost-benefit analysis:
- The choices made by non-human animals are not conscious choices
- Individuals’ behaviour varies within populations
foraging
when animals seek food
-always making choices
EX: Fruit flies
Proximate Causes: Foraging alleles
Fruit fly larvae exhibit one of two behaviours during feeding:
“Rovers” move after feeding in a particular location
“Sitters” stay in one location to feed•
Experiments showed this behaviour inheritable via the foraging (for) gene that produces a protein active in the nervous system
Adult flies express the same foraging alleles as larval flies
EX: Fruit flies
Ultimate Causes: Optimal foraging
The rover allele is favoured at high population density
Rovers are more likely to find unused food patches•
The sitter allele is favoured at low population density Sitters do not waste energy searching for food
Optimal foraging
–individuals make decisions that maximize the amount of food (usable energy they take in)
–weigh costs of finding and ingesting their food and the risk of being eaten while they’re at it
EX: Arctic Seals
have to find shallow water with plenty of food to avoid over-exhausting themselves
EX: Bumblebees
want to fly short distances between flowers to save the most energy and obtain the most honey