Chapter 5- Socialism and Capitalism Flashcards
socialize and individual’s cost or value
spread it to society at large
An advocate of socialism asserts:
that the individual should act to promote the good of society, not to promote the individual’s well being.
Karl Marx
father of socialism: Production should come “from each, according to his ability, to each, according to his need”
authoritarian choice
only alternative to individual economic freedom, state’s decisions are made by a dictator, the peoples’ elected
representatives, or by popular vote
original rationales for socialism
fairness, firms have more power than individuals, rigid class systems don’t allow for true economic movement, unemployed masses due to advances in technology
modern rationales for socialism
we must socialize individual decisions by state force in order to counter nature’s socializing effects
exteral cost
costs spill over to other people
external benefit
benefits spill over to other people
externalities
external costs and external benefits
maintaining socialist order: if people disagree — two options:
1) allow individual choice (doesn’t maintain socialist order)
2) use force and threat of force to maintain socialist order
fascism
A system under which the state does not take title to property, but orders the use of that property and the individual in any way it
wishes
US socialism is generally:
fascistic in nature
eminent domain
where property is taken for state public use, such as roads, and parks, but the owner is compensated (sometimes state takes and sells purely for business interests)
civil forfeiture
where a person is suspected of a crime and that person’s property is seized because it is automatically suspected as having contributed to the crime : often, la enforcement targets individuals they believe have large sums of cash which is then used to fund law enforcement (other bureaucrats sometimes get cuts)
latest socialist rationale in the US
if the state provides any good from which the
individual might derive external benefits—for example, roads, schools, and courts—that no property is
private and the state is justified in dictating the use of the individual’s property and income