Chapter 5: Resources & capabilities Flashcards

1
Q

What did Jay Barney say in 1991?

A

The competitive advantage and superior performance of an organisation is explained by the distinctiveness of its resources and capabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an example of a company from a resource-based perspective?

A

Tesla. Tesla has successfully entered the industry based on its specialized capabilities; it was not so much the characteristics of the environment that explain these differences in performance, but difference in organization-specific resources and capabilities. This puts the focus on variations between companies within the same environment and how they vary in their resources and capabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What can the RBV perspective explain?

A

It can explain how companies within the same industry are affected differently by external market forces.

For instance, Porsche and Hyundai are both within the same automobile industry but the the Five Forces affect them differently becaues they have different internal resources and capabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can you define resources and capabilities?

A

Resources: what we have
Capabilities: what we do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is threshold resources & capabilities?

A

Threshold resources and capabilities are those needed for an organisation to meet the necessary requirements to compete at all in a given market (bare minimum). Without these, the organisation cannot survive over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is distinctive resources and capabilities?

A

Distinctive resources and capabilities are required to achieve competitive advantage. This means that they deliver value and are being distinguished from their competitors. Ex: Apple has distinctive resources in smartphone technology and in its powerful brand, together with distinctive capabilities in design and in understanding consumer behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the VRIO framework?

A

This framework provides four criteria by which resources and capabilities can be assessed in terms of them providing a basis for achieving competitive advantage. A VRIO analysis can be done for different functions in an organisation, ex technology, marketing or sales.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the V in VRIO (3 factors)

A

Resources and capabilities are valuable when they create a product or service that is of value to customers and enables the organisation to respond to environmental oppotrunities or threats. Value chain analysis and activity systems mapping can be helpful here.

1. Value to customers
It needs to bring value to customers. Having resources and capabilities that are different from other organization is not in itself a basis of competitive advantage.

2. Taking advantage of opportunities and neutralizing threats
To be valuable, resources and capabilities need to address opportunities and threats that arise in an organisations environment. An external opportunity is addressed when a resource or cap increases the value for customers either through lowering their price or increasing the attractiveness. Ex IKEA.

3. Cost
The product or service needs to be provided at a cost that still allows the organisation to make the returns expected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the R in VRIO

A

R for Rarity.
Resources and capabilities cannot just be valuable; many competitors have valuable resources and capabilities. To gain competitive advantage, these need to be unique, differentiated, and just possessed by one or a few other competitiors. For example: patented products; libraries that only have access to unique and old books; mining companies that have access to unique mining sites.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the I in VRIO and its three points

A

I for inimitability.
SCA also involves identifying inimitable resources and capabilities; those that competitors find it hard/costly to copy or imitate or find substitutes for. Often, the barriers to imitation lie deeply in the organisation in linkages between activities, skills and people.

It is unusual for sustainable long term competitive advantage to be explained by tangible resources such as machines since these can be acquired or imitated. Advantage is more likely to be determined by the way in which resources are deployed and managed in terms of an organisations activities. Ex: having a IT system will not in itself improve an organizations SCA; competitors can buy something similar. But the capability to manage, develop and deploy such a system to the benefit of customers may be much harder and costly to imitate; capabilities tend to involve much more intangible imitation barriers; they often include linkages that integrate activities, skills, knowledge and people both inside and outside the organisation in distinct and mutually compatible ways. It is these linkages that are hard to imitate and there are three primary reasons for this.

  1. Complexity (internal linkages and external interconnectedness)
  2. Casual ambiguity
  3. Culture and history (path dependency)
    Capabilities can be embedded in an organizations culture. Coordination between various activities occurs naturally because people know their part in the wider picture, or it is simply taken for granted that activities are done in a certain way. IKEA is a example of this where their strategy build upon a strong organizational culture and vision.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is casual ambiguity? (I in VRIO)

A

Causal ambiguity is a situation where competitors cannot clearly understand the connection between a company’s resources, capabilities, and its competitive advantage. This makes it hard for them to copy or replicate the strategy.

Because of this uncertainty, it becomes difficult and costly for competitors to imitate the company’s success, giving the original company a sustained competitive advantage. For example, a company might have a unique culture or complex processes that are not obvious to competitors, and this complexity or hidden value creates causal ambiguity.

Casual ambiguity might exist in two different forms:

1. Characteristic ambiguity (which are the key traits or qualities?)

2. Linkage ambiguity (how is everything efficiently linked?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the O in VRIO

A

O for organisational support.
The organisation must be suitably organized to support the V, R and I in order to successfully and effectively create long term sustainable competitive advantage. This requires appropriate organisational processes and systems. Ex: you have a patent but not the capability to sell the product because of a poor sales team.

Supportive capabilities have been labelled complementary capabilities as they by themselves are not enough to provide for CA but are useful in the exploitation of other capabilities that can provide for this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the value chain and what does it consist of?

A

Value chain by Porter.

Focus on breaking down the company’s internal activities (primary activities and support activities) to understand how each contributes to value creation. The goal is to understand how these activities can provide a competitive advantage by delivering value more efficiently or effectively than competitors.

Primary activities: procurement, firm infrastructure, HR, technology.
Support activities: Inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the value system?

A

Its very rare that an organisation does in-house for all the value activities. There is usually specialization of activities; one supplier, one that transports etc.

A value system therefore expands beyond the company, looking at how its value chain connects with suppliers, partners, and distributors to create value across the entire supply chain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the four questions that arise when understanding the value chain and value system?

A
  1. The “make or buy” or outsourcing question
    We want to own the parts of the value chain that creates the most value. Typically this can be marketing, customer relationships, sales and other primary activities.
  2. What are the activities and cost/price structures of the value system?
  3. Where are the profit pools?
  4. Which partners should we have?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is activity systems?

A

The way in which resources and capabilities are deployed throughout the organisation.
How the organisation meets the CSF determining them in the industry.

Activity systems mapping gives a greater understanding of the complexity of resources and capabilities. An activity systems map emphasises the importance of different activities that create value to customers pulling in the same direction and supporting rather than opposing each other. So, the need is to understand

  1. the fit between the various activities and how these reinforce each other
  2. the fit externally with the needs of clients
17
Q

What is dynamic capabilities?

A

Noted by David Teece, dynamic capabilities is underlining the importance of that distinctive resources and capabilities cannot be static, they need to change and be dynamic.

Dynamic capabilities: an organisations ability to renew and recreate its resources and capabilities to meet the needs of changing environments. A distinguishment from ordinary capabilities. They are dynamic in the sense that they can create, extend or modify an organisations existing ordinary capabilities. Example: new product development, acquisitions, reorganization.

18
Q

What are the three generic types of dynamic capabilities?

A

Sensing.
Scan the environment and explore opportunities.

Seizing.
Seize the opportunitiy.

Reconfiguring.
Put the work into action.

19
Q

How can we classify the 4 resources according to Barney and Clark (2007)?

A

Physical capital resources.

Financial capital resources.

Human capital resources.

Organizational capital resources.

20
Q

How can we classify resources according to Grant (2010)?

A

Tangible.
(Financial, physical)

Intangible
(Technology, reputation, culture)

Human
(skills, communication, motivation)

21
Q

What are the critiques of RBV?

A

1. Lack of empirical support.

2. The definition of resources is too broad and non-differentiating.

3. RBV is more explanatory (describing what is) rather than prescriptive (providing actionable steps). It doesn’t guide managers on how to implement strategies.

22
Q

What is core competences? (Hamel and Prahalad, 1990)

A

According to Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad, 1990, core competencies are the unique, knowledge and abilities within an organization that provide it with a competitive advantage.

23
Q

How does the RBV explain competitive advantage?

A

Strategy: Not only a positioning of the products of the
firm (outputs).
* Strategic choices depend upon an evolving resource-
base of the firm.
* Strategy is a about finding and building an appropriate
resource base. Competition takes place on the level of
resources & capabilities (inputs).
* Successful strategies require integration of resources

24
Q

What are the two assumption of the VRIO framework that gives rise to SCA?

A

The VRIO framework is used to assess a company’s resources and capabilities in terms of their potential to provide a sustainable competitive advantage. It makes certain assumptions about firms and their resources, which are critical to understanding how competitive advantages are formed and maintained:

1. Heterogeneous Resources Across Firms
The assumption that firms in the same industry may have different (heterogeneous) resources is crucial because not all firms will possess the same resources in terms of quality, quantity, or effectiveness. This heterogeneity creates the potential for some firms to gain a competitive advantage if they control better or more valuable resources than others.
Even in the industry based models, firms were viewed as fairly similar. But we see that organizations are different; they are resources.

2. Imperfect Mobility of Resources
This assumption states that resources are not perfectly mobile, meaning that they cannot easily be transferred from one firm to another. If resources could move freely between firms, any competitive advantage gained by one firm could be easily neutralized by others acquiring the same resources. So firms can maintain heterogeneity over time, meaning that if one firm develops valuable, rare, inimitable, and well-organized resources, these advantages can be sustained. Factors such as company culture, specialized know-how, or long-term contracts are not easily replicated or transferred. Example: A company’s corporate culture or long-term relationships with suppliers can be difficult for competitors to imitate or replicate. This makes the advantage long-lasting, as these resources are “stuck” within the firm, and not easily available to others.

25
Q

What is economies of scope?

A

Fixed costs (marketing departments) are distributed over many products.

Ex: Using the marketing department for your cars but also for boats.

This can be done due to managerial capabilities. If you have a capable and trained marketing department they can do more than JUST cars.

26
Q

What is economies of scale?

A

Fixed costs divided by many units.

27
Q

Why do we have firms?

A

Firms are about exchange and transactions of resources. Most popular theory is from Ronald Coase (1937): his book transaction cost economies.

28
Q

What did Jonsson & Regner 2009 say about barriers to imitation?

A

That it is not just the ability of not being able to imitate, it can also be the unwillingness to imitate.

even where competitor competences are iden- tified, imitation can still be hampered by a lack of willingness to imitate.

unwillingness to imitate is rooted in adherence to institutionalized sets of practices and norms, or a logic.

29
Q

What was Chandlers message in “Organizational capabilities”? (1992)

A

Alfred D. Chandler explores how organizational capabilities were key to the rise and competitive advantage of large industrial enterprises during the Second Industrial Revolution. Here are the main points:

  1. Emergence of Large Firms: In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, new capital-intensive industries (such as steel, chemicals, and machinery) saw the rise of large firms. These companies thrived by exploiting economies of scale (large production capacities) and economies of scope (producing varied products efficiently).
  2. Organizational Learning and Capabilities: Chandler emphasizes that competitive advantage came from not only technology but also organizational capabilities—the skills and knowledge within a company to effectively manage large-scale production, distribution, and innovation.
  3. Impact on Competition: Large firms dominated their industries by mastering these capabilities, which acted as barriers for new competitors. These capabilities became “organizational routines” that enabled established companies to continuously innovate and adapt.
  4. Influence of First-Mover Advantage: Chandler also explains that first movers (those who entered industries early) often led because they had more time to build and refine their capabilities, making it difficult for later entrants to catch up.

Chandler’s work shows that long-term success for firms often depends on building and nurturing unique organizational capabilities that allow for efficient production, innovation, and competitive adaptation over time.

30
Q

What is the three parts of dynamic capabilities?

A

Sensing, seizing, reconfiguration