Chapter 5 - Part Two Flashcards

1
Q

Two reasons for the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906?

A

“The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair

  • book
  • exposed chicago meat packing

Spanish American War
-soldiers fed bad meat and couldn’t fight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Another name for the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906?

A

The Wiley Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 require of people?

A
  • forbid adulteration of food in interstate and foreign commerce
  • set standards of purity/quality to follow

-if you didn’t follow standards, you just had to disclose that on label

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MacPherson v. Buick

A
  • crashed car b/c defective wooden spoke
  • sued Buick manufacturer NOT local dealership
  • manufacturer bought spoke from someone else first so said they shouldn’t be sued
  • victim won in court

-court said they “negligently put car out on the market”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Caveat Emptor?

A

means “Let the buyer Beware”

  • history of product safety up to 1900s
  • could sell anything with no repercussions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6 things MacPherson v. Buick established regarding negligence?

A

Manufacturer is Liable if:

  • negligently put product on market
  • product was defective
  • without inspection
  • knew purchaser wouldn’t inspect
  • product reached consumer is same condition it left factory
  • caused HARm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 defenses someone can take in a negligence case?

A

Assumption of Risk
-read me first books

Contributory/Comparative Negligence

  • defendant says victim was negligent
  • that’s why they were hurt

Intervening causation

  • “but for” situations
  • says victim was hurt because of another event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Products liability in Texas?

A
  • manufacturer owes reasonable care of duty to customers

- manufacturer should recognize all those who they could potentially harm (foreseeable zone of danger)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Defenses to Negligence in Texas?

A

Intervening Causation

Contributory/Compartive Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Baxter v. Ford Motor Company

A

Expressed Warranty

  • baxter lost eye from shattered glass
  • Ford Motor Company warranty said glass would not shatter
  • made companies liable for what they said in advertisements

Case established 3 rules to determine if a Manufacturer is liable in a case like that

  1. Harm was caused
  2. Consumer relied on them
  3. material statement made (EX: Our glass won’t shatter) caused someone to buy the product because of it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does Texas recognize express warranty torts?

A

Yes, under both

Common Law
Statutory Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors

A

Established Implied Warranty

  • man buys car for wife
  • car loses control and crashed 10 days later
  • car destroyed so couldn’t prove defects
  • Court rules against manufactuer
  • said they have Implied Warranty of Merchantability (it is implied that a car will work properly when sold)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Two types of implied warranties Texas recognizes?

A

Implied Warranty of Merchantability

  • product must be of fair/average quality
  • product must be fit for intended purposes
  • product must be adequately packaged
  • product has to conform to promises on label

Implied Warranty of Particular Person
-seller should know the consumer’s
specific needs/expectations
-seller implies a guarantee product will perform as marketed to individual customer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Meaning of Caveat Veditor?

A

“Let the seller beware”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the difference between Strict Liability and Negligence

A
  • You sell a wild Mountain Lion to your friend and it later kills them
  • you are Liable without Fault
  • Is strict Liability not Negligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4 Elements needed to establish Strict Liability

A

There was a sale
-identify sellers/buyers
-seller has to be in business of selling
product that caused harm

Product was defective
-product a substantial factor in harming victim

Unreasonable Danger

Product has to be Defective when it leaves Manufacturer

17
Q

4 Defenses to Strict Liabilty

A

Product Abuse
Comparative Negligence
Statue of Limitations
Assumption of Risk

18
Q

Sindell v. Abbot Laboratories

A

Established Market Share Liability (Strict Liability)

  • drug DES caused deformed babies
  • multiple manufacturers of the drug so no way to prove who caused what
  • manufacturers shared liability
  • says if you produce 15% of product on the market then you are 15% liable all
  • all products have to be IDENTICAL for shared liability
19
Q

Absolute Liability example?

A
  • Asbestos manufacturers infinitely liable for deaths of people
  • have to keep running fund to compensate victims
20
Q

What types of products are under Strict Liability?

A

Unreasonably Dangerous Products

  • Extreme health risks
  • Extreme safety risks