Chapter 5 - Miscellaneous Torts Affecting Business Flashcards
What are three categories of torts important to business?
Business Torts, False statements and torts related to land
What are included in the Business torts?
Conspiracy, Intimidation, Interference with Contractual Relations and Unlawful Means Tort
What is the tort of conspiracy?
Occurs when two or more defendants agree to act together to cause the plaintiff to suffer a financial loss
What are the two types of conspiracy torts?
Lawful act conspiracy and unlawful act conspiracy
What does Lawful Act conspiracy mean?
Occurs when two or more people cooperate on a course of conduct, that by itself, is lawful. Liability is imposed when believed that they came together for the primary purpose of hurting the plaintiff
What does Unlawful Act conspiracy mean?
The defendants conspired tow commit an act that was unlawful in itself. Proof that the defendants should have know that their actions might hurt the plaintiff
What is the tort of Intimidation?
Plaintiff suffers a loss as a result of the defendant’s threat to commit an unlawful act against either the plaintiff or a third party
What are the two branches of the tort of intimidation?
Two-party intimidation and three-party intimidation
What is two-party intimidation? p.108
Occurs when the defendant directly coerces the plaintiff into suffering a loss
What is three-party intimidation? p.108
Occurs when the defendant coerces a third party into acting in a way that hurts the plaintiff
What are the requirements for a two-party /third-party intimidation tort?
Proof the defendant committed a unlawful act, The defendant is liable only if its threat was effective (intimidate either the plaintiff or third party)
What occurs when a defendant’s threat to breach a contract?
With a third party will result in liability but the same threat to breach a contract may not be enough in a two party case (can simply sue for breach of contract)
What does the tort of intimidation NOT require?
Does not require proof that the defendant intended to hurt the plaintiff. Still liable if the defendant only wanted to benefit itself, rather than injure the plaintiff
What is the tort of interface with contractual relations?
Occurs when the defendant disrupts a contract that exists between the plaintiff and a third party
What are the four elements of the cause of action for “interference with contractual relations”?
Knowledge, intention, cause and loss
Within the tort of interference with contractual relations, what can the plaintiff sue for?
Sue the defendant in tort for inducing a breach of contract. Sue the third party in contract for actually breaching the agreement
If the plaintiff choses both actions of suing the defendant and the third party, what happens?
The plaintiff cannot recover full damages under BOTH actions, the plaintiff will have to elect between two sets of damages
What can occur if the defendant’s conduct is particularly “outrageous”
The plaintiff may be entitled to recover punitive damages and compensatory damages (under the tort)
What are the two branches of the tort of interference with contractual relations?
Direct and indirect, defendant directly/indirectly induced a third party to breach a contract with the plaintiff
What is the unlawful means tort?
Occurs if the defendant committed an unlawful act against a third party with the intention of causing the plaintiff to suffer an economic loss
What are the necessary elements of the unlawful means tort?
Parasitic, Intention and Actionable Wrong
What is the parasitic element?
The tort is parasitic meaning the plaintiff must latch onto a tort claim that the third party has against the Defendant, pg.112 for example
What is the intention element
Liability requires proof that the defendant committed a wrong against the third party with the intention/purpose of causing the plaintiff to suffer an economic loos
What is the Actionable Wrong element?
The plaintiff must prove that the defendant committed a civilly actionable wrong against the third party. The plaintiff can sue the defendant only if the third party can sue the defendant