Chapter 5 - Intentional Torts and Business Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Define Tort

A

A violation of a duty imposed by civil law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Libel

A

Written Defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Negligence

A

A tort that concerns harm that arises by accident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Tortious Interference with a Contract

A

Occurs when a defendant deliberately harms a contractual relationship between two other parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Fraud

A

Injuring someone by deliberate deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who is responsible to begin a tort?

A

The injured party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What can a person be declared at the end of a criminal case?

A

Guilty or Not Guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can a person be declared at the end of a civil case?

A

Liable or not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Intentional Tort

A

Torts that involve harm caused by deliberate action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Slander

A

Oral Defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Element

A

A fact that a plaintiff must prove to win a lawsuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the four elements that must be proven to win a defamation case?

A

Defamatory Statement, Falseness, Communicated, and Injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Defamatory Statement

A

This is a statement likely to harm another person’s reputation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Falseness

A

The statement must be false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Communicated

A

The statement must be communicated to at least one other person other than the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define Injury (as it relates to slander cases)

A

In many slander cases, the plaintiff generally must show some injury. But in slander cases that involve false statements about sexual behavior, crimes, contagious diseases, and professional abilities, the law is willing to assume injury without requiring the plaintiff to prove it. Lies in these four categories amount to slander per se.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define Slander Per Se.

A

A type of statement that are, by their nature, presumed to damage a person’s reputation, so therefore not needing to be proved and monetary damages are presumed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which kind of defamation cases are treated like cases of slander per se?

A

Libel cases are treated like cases of slander per se, and courts award damages without proof of injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a valid defense in a defamation suit against falseness?

A

Opinion - They cannot be proven true or false.

20
Q

Who receives less protection from defamation?

A

Government officials and other types of public figures.

21
Q

What is the landmark case regarding defamation against public figures?

A

New York Times v. Sullivan - Police cheif of Birmingham Alabama claimed that the Times falsely accused him of racial violence on his job. He lost because he could not prove that the Times had acted with actual malice.

22
Q

Due to the landmark case, what additional item does a public figure need to prove to win a defamation suit?

A

Actual Malice

23
Q

Define Actual Malice

A

Means that the defendant in a defamation suit knew his or her statement was false and acted with reckless disregard of the truth.

24
Q

Define False Imprisonment. When can a store hold someone?

A

The intentional restraint of a another person without reasonable cause or consent

Generally, a store may detain a customer or worker for alleged shoplifting provided there is a reasonable basis for the suspicion and detention is done reasonably.

25
Q

Define Battery

A

A harmful or offensive bodily contact

26
Q

Define Assault

A

An action that causes another person to fear imminent battery

27
Q

Define Infliction of Emotional Distress

A

Extreme and outrageous conduct that causes serious emotional harm.
A tort. It can be the intentional infliction of emotional distress, meaning that the defendant behaved outrageously and deliberately caused the plaintiff severe psychological injury, or it can be the negligent infliction of emotional distress, meaning that the defendant’s conduct violated the rules of negligence.

28
Q

What is the Landmark case dealing with Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?

A

Jane Doe & Nancy Roe v. Lynn Mills - An antiabortion protester got records of these two women who were to have abortions and publicly protested using their names. The ladies won.

29
Q

Define Compensatory Damages

A

Damages intended to restore the plaintiff to the position he was in before the defendant’s conduct caused injury
Damages that flow directly from the contract.

30
Q

Define Single Recovery Principal

A

Requires a court to settle a legal case once and for all, by awarding a lump sum for past and future expenses.

31
Q

How are damages calculated?

A
  • A plaintiff receives money for medical expenses. If a doctor testifies he will need more treatment in the future they try to guess how much it will cost and award those as well.
  • 2nd, the defendants are libel for lost wages, past and future.
  • 3rd, a plaintiff is paid for pain and suffering.
32
Q

Define Punitive Damages

A

Punish the defendant for conduct that is extreme and outrageous.

33
Q

What is the idea behind punitive damages?

A

That a certain behavior is so unacceptable that society must make an example of it.

34
Q

What are the three ‘guideposts’ a court must consider to ensure the punitive damages are reasonable.

A
  • The reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct
  • The ratio between harm suffered and the award. Generally, the punitive award should not be more than 9 times the compensatory award. The Supreme Court, does not completely prohibit punitive damages that exceed the 9-to-1 ratio. The justices merely state that such awards should be reserved for rare cases of unusual reprehensible conduct.
  • The difference between the punitive award and and civil penalties used in similar cases.
35
Q

Define Economic Damages

A

Lost wages, medical expenses, and other measurable loses

36
Q

Define Non-Economic Damages

A

Pain and suffering and other non measurable loses

37
Q

What four elements must a plaintiff establish to win a Tortious interference with a contract case?

A
  • There was a contract between the plaintiff and a third party
  • The defendant knew of the contract
  • The defendant improperly induced the third party to breach the contract or made performance of the contract impossible, and
  • There was injury to the plaintiff
38
Q

Define Intrusion

A

A tort if a reasonable person would find it offensive

39
Q

Define Commercial Exploitation

A

Prohibits the unauthorized use of another person’s likeness or voice for business purposes.

40
Q

Define Conversion

A

A tort committed by taking or using someone else’s personal property without his permission.

41
Q

What has been the progress at a state and federal level of tort reform?

A
  • About half the states have put in place limits.

- Congress and proposed and debated bills placing limits on tort awards, but so far has not enacted such legislation

42
Q

The United States v. Lopez demonstrates what?

A

Limitations of federal power

43
Q

What is the primary source of federal power to regulate business?

A

The Commerce Clause

44
Q

What are the Bill of Rights?

A

The first 10 Amendments of the Constitution

45
Q

What is the legislation issue when the 15th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause’s “strict scrutiny” test will be used?

A

Differentiates on the basis of race