Chapter 5 - General Principles on Personal Injury Claims Flashcards

1
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON PERSONAL INJURY

Overview

A

1) general objectives for damages
2) numbers of claims
3) scope of special damages
4) scope of general damages
5) scope of aggravated damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON PERSONAL INJURY

General objectives for damages

A

Ong Ah Long v Dr. S. Underwood:

  • To compensate, not punitive.
  • Compensate injured party for reparation for the wrongful act;
  • For all the natural & direct consequence of the wrongful act;
  • So far as money can compensate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON PERSONAL INJURY

Number of claims

A

Fitter v Veal:

  • P has only one cause action & will wholly extinguish when the judgment is given;
  • Claims can only be brought once;
  • H/ever, when there were two distinct & separate rights are violated, P may bring two separate suits against the same D.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON PERSONAL INJURY

Scope of special damages

A

Ong Ah Long v Dr. S. Underwood:

  • Actual P’s pecuniary loss between the date of accident until the date of the award / settlement.
  • Need to be specifically pleaded & strictly proved.
  • Exact loss must be pleaded because it has became clear before the trial.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON PERSONAL INJURY

Scope of general damages

A

Sam Wun Hoong v Kader Ibramsah:

  • General damages need not be specifically pleaded;
  • Comprises damages for pain & suffering, loss of amenities & the like which the law implies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON PERSONAL INJURY

Scope of aggravated damages

A

Dr. Hari Krishnan v Megat Noor Ishak bin Megat Noor Ibrahim:

  • Aggravated damages could and had been awarded as a separate head of damage in tort;
  • Aggravated damages are frequently awarded in defamation cases for injury to a person’s reputation;
  • hence there was no reason to exclude this kind of damages from medical negligence cases, which involve real injury to a person’s body.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly