Chapter 5:Curvature of a surface Flashcards

1
Q

unit normal vectors?

A

for a regular parametrized surface σ : U → R^3

there are 2 unit normal vectors X_u and X_v

for each (u, v) ∈ U.

eg if intersects itself 4 normals at this point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition 5.1.1. The preferred unit normal vector

A

Definition 5.1.1. The preferred unit normal vector of the regular parametrization
σ : U → R^3 at the point (u, v) ∈ U is

n(u, v) = [σu(u, v) × σv(u, v)]/
[||σu(u, v) × σv(u, v)||]

This defines a map n: U → R^3
field of unit normals

surface in R^3 has a tangent plane containing vectors X_u and X_v. Normal to this plane is n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EXAMPLE:

normal vector of the sphere S^2 at (x, y, z) is

A

given by the radius vector, i.e. (x, y, z) itself, and it is also a unit vector. In
other words,
(x, y, z) = a unit normal vector of S^2
at the point (x, y, z).

UNIT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EXAMPLE:
normal vector of the sphere at (x, y, z)

Example 3.3.6 of S
2 \ {N, S}, the sphere without the North and South poles,

A

its the surface of rev of the open semicircle parametrized by γ:]-π/2,π/2[→ R^3

φ →(cosφ,0,sinφ)
the resulting para surface of rev is

σ: ]-π/2,π/2[ x R →R^3
σ(φ,θ) = (cosφcosθ,cosφsinθ,sinφ)

σ_φ=(-sinφcosθ,-sinφsinθ,cosφ)
σ_θ=(-cosφsinθ,cosφcosθ,0)

σ_φ x σ_θ=
(-cos^2(φ)cosθ,-sinθcos^2(φ),-cos^2(θ)sinφcosφ +sinφcosφsin^2(θ))

so n=-σ(φ,θ)

(into the sphere as neg)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The partial derivatives n_u and n_v

A

For σ : U → R^3 a parametrized surface the preferred unit normal vectors
form a vector valued function n: U → R^3
The partial derivatives n_u and n_v measure the variations of n in the u- and v-directions

n has constant
magnitude so
n_u and n_v are ORTHOGONAL to n
This means nu and nv are tangent vectors. Therefore we may write

−nu = W11σu + W21σv,
−nv = W12σu + W22σv
where W11, W12, W21, W22 are some functions of (u, v); the minus signs are
just a matter of convention.

(COLUMNS OF WEINGARTEN and neg, these show the normal vectors as we move in u or v direction )

*n_u and n_v lie in tangent plane (orthogonal to normal) so are linear combination of σ_u and σ_v, which form a basis for the tangent plane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition 5.2.1. The WEINGARTEN MATRIX

A

The Weingarten matrix or shape operator of σ is the matrix
W =
[W11 W12]
[W21 W22]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Definition 5.2.1. THE SECOND FUNDAMENTAL FORM

A
The second fundamental form of σ is the matrix
II =
[σuu · n   σuv · n]
[σuv · n    σvv · n]
=:
[L M]
[M N]
,
where this defines the functions L, M, N : U → R.

combos of -n_u and -n_v

SECOND partial derivatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

THM 5.2.2

Weingarten is expressible in terms of

A

The Weingarten is expressible in terms of the first and second
fundamental forms as follows:

W=
[W_11   W_12 ]
[W_21  W_22]
=
[E  F ]^-1    [L M]
[F  G]        [M N]

where the first fundamental form of a smooth regular surface is always invertible

(FFF is σu·σu, σvσv etc)

INVERSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

proof:

The Weingarten is expressible in terms of the first and second
fundamental forms

A
[E  F ]
[F  G]    W  =
[σu·σu σu·σv] [W_11   W_12 ]
[σv·σu σv·σv] [W_21  W_22]
=
[σu σv ·W11+σu σv ·W21 ...]
[...  ...]
=*
[σuu · n   σuv · n]
[σuv · n    σvv · n]
=
[L M]
[M N]
= ||

*by product rule
0=(σ_u· n)_u =σ_uu· n + σ_u· n_u
(=0 as σ_u orthogonal to n, which is normal to tangent plane of σ containing σ_u and σ_v)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example:
Compute first and second fundamental forms and
thus the Weingarten matrix of the helicoid
σ : R^2 → R^3
σ(u, v) = (vcos u, vsinu, u),

**mistakes

A
σ_u=(-vsinu,vcosu,1)
σ_v=(cosu,sinu,0)
σ_uu=(-vcosu,-vsinu,0)
σ_vv=(0,0,0)
σ_uv=(-sinu,cosu,0)

σu·σu= (vsinu)^2 +(vcosu)^2+1 = 1+v^2
σu·σv= (-vsinucosu) +(vcosusinu) +0 =0
σv·σv=cos^u +sin^2u = 1

n= cross product σu x σv NORMALISED****
=
_*(-sinu,cosu, -vsin^2(u)-vcos^2(u))
= _*(-sinu,cosu,-v)
=1/√(1+v^2)(-sinu,cosu,-v)

σuu·n=1/√(1+v^2) =0
σvv·n=0
σuv·n=1/√(1+v^2) =1/√(1+v^2)

FFF^-1 =
[1+v^2  0]-1
[     0      ]
=(1/[1+v^2])*
[1       0    ]
[0  1+v^2 ]
MULTIPLY BY 1/DET***

W=
(1/[1+v^2])*
[1 0 ][ 0 1/√(1+v^2) ]
[0 1+v^2][ 1/√(1+v^2) 0 ]

=
[ 0 (1+v^2)^{-3/2} ]
[(1+v^2)^{-1/2} 0 ]

  • n_u (u,v) = (1+v^2)^{-0.5}σ_v
  • n_v (u,v) =(1+v^2)^{-3/2}σ_u

You can then deduce that as we move along the v-direction, i.e. along a horizontal line, −n keeps bending sideways towards the u-direction.

HELICOID -“spiral slide”

move in Direction σ_u then the normal changes a small amount perpendicular to the normal Vector in the tangent plane thus this is a linear combination of σ_u and σ_v

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EXAMPLE:

Consider the parametrized surface of revolution (Example
3.3.4):
σ : R^2 → R^3
σ(t, θ) = (x(t) cos θ, x(t) sin θ, z(t)).
We assume that x(t) > 0 and that the generating curve is regular, so that σ is regular (Exercise 3.4.7.). The preferred unit normal field and the second fundamental form are

LEARN***

A

n(t,θ)=

[-z’(t)cosθ, -z’(t)sinθ, x’(t))]/[√(x’(t)^2 + z’(t)^2)]

(normalised vector)

II(t, θ) =

1/[√(x’(t)^2 + z’(t)^2)] *
[x’(t)z’‘(t) -x’‘(t)z’(t) 0 ]
[ 0 x(t)z’(t)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EXAMPLE:

Consider the cylinder (Example 3.3.5):
σ : R^2 → R^3
σ(t, θ) = (cos θ, sin θ, t).

A

We have x(t) = 1 and z(t) = t, so that with the previous example

n(t,θ)=(-cosθ,sinθ,0)

II(t, θ) =
[0 0]
[0 1]

W=
[0 0]
[0 1]

Notice that the following unit normal vector points inwards and that
−nt = 0, −nθ = σθ
By the first equation, as we move along the t-direction, i.e. along a longitude line, −n remains the same. By the second equation, as we move along the θ-direction, i.e. along a latitude CIRCLE, −n keeps bending forward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EXAMPLE:

Consider the parametrization of the sphere S^2
(Example 3.3.6)
σ :]−π/2,π/2[× R → R^3

σ(φ, θ) = (cos φ cos θ, cos φ sin θ, sin φ).

A

We have
x(φ) = cos φ and
z(φ) = sin φ, so that

n(φ, θ) =
(-cosφcos θ, -cosφsinθ, -sinφ)

II(θ,φ) =
[1 0 ]
[0 cos^2(φ)]

W(φ,θ) =
[1 0]
[0 1]

Note that the unit normal vector points inwards, and that
−n_φ = σ_φ,
−n_θ = σ_θ

By the first equation, as we move along the φ-direction, i.e. along a longitude,
−n keeps bending forward. By the second equation, as we move along the θ-direction, i.e. along a latitude, −n also keeps bending forward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
EXAMPLE:
the parametrized catenoid
σ : R^2 → R^3
σ(t, θ) = 
(cosh t cos θ, cosht sin θ, t).
has Weingarten matrix
A

W_(t,θ) =
[−(cosh t)^−2 0 ]
[ 0 (cosh t)^−2]

(=
[(sinh^t +1)^0.5 0 ]^-1
[ 0 cosht]

*
[ cosht 0 ]
[0 cosht]
)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Definition 5.4.1.

The Weingarten map

A

Let σ : U → R^3 be a parametrized surface and (u0, v0) ∈ U.
The Weingarten map (curlyW)_(u0,v0) of σ at (u0, v0) is the map

(curlyW)(u0,v0) :
T
(u0,v0)σ → T(u0,v0)σ,

γ˜(0) → −(d/dt)| _t=0 n(γ(t))

any tangent vector to a curve at X

map is independent of the basis chosen

3.4.6 if X∈T(u_0,v_0)
then there exists γ: ]−ε, ε[ → U st if we take γ˜ = σ ◦ γ then tangent vector is X γ˜^•(0)=X
diagram: tangent space contains γ~

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

THM 5.4.2

weingarten map and matrix relation

A

The Weingarten map curlyW(u0,v0)
is represented by the Weingarten matrix W(u0,v0)
in the basis {σu(u0, v0), σv(u0, v0)} of T(u0,v0)σ, in other words

curlyW(u0,v0)(aσu(u0, v0) + bσv(u0, v0)) =
W(u0,v0) *
[a]
[b]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

EXAMPLE:
Choose an arbitrary point on the 2-dimensional sphere S^2
and compute the Weingarten map of the sphere at this point

A
for this curlyW of any point is identity mao 
innter product
I(  (a,b) , (c,d)) = 
            (c)
(a  b) I  (d)
=
[a]T     [c]
[b]   I   [d]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

PROOF

THM 5.4.2

weingarten map and matrix relation

A

if γ(t)=(u(t),v(t)) and
(σ ◦ γ)(t)=γ~(t) then

γ~•(t)=u’(t)σ_u(γ(t)) +v’(t)σ_v(γ(t)) * by the chain rule.

Similarly (d/dt)(n(γ(t)) = u’(t)n_u(γ(t)) +v’(t)n_v(γ(t))**
we want γ st
γ~•(0) =aσ_u(u_0,v_0) + bσ_v(u_0,v_0)

taking γ(t)=(u_0+at, v_0 +by) for t∈]−ε, ε[ and small  ε. By *:
γ~•(0)=aσ_u +bσ_v. Then def of map curlyW(aσ_u(u_0,v_0) +bσ_v(u_0,v_0))
=
curlyW(γ~•(0))
=
-d/dt (n(γ(t))|_t=0
=
-u'(0)n_u(u0,v0) - v'(0)n_v(u0,v0)
=-an_u -bn_v
=a(W_11σ_u  + W_21σ_v) + b(W_12σ_u  + W_22σ_v)
=
[aW_11 + bW_12  ]
[aW_21 + bW_22]
wrt basis {σ_u,σ_v}
=
W*
[a]
[b]
=

as required

**we know that as -n is a unit vector

d/dt (n(γ(t)) ∈T_γ(t) σ
and this up to a sign is curlyw_(u_0,v_0)X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

PROP 5.4.4

a property of the weingarten map
curlyw

A

The Weingarten map curlyW is self-adjoint.

Namely, for any tangent vectors X, Y at (u0, v0),

we have
curlyW_(u0,v0) (X) · Y =
X · W_(u0,v0)(Y)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

PROOF

PROP 5.4.4

a property of the weingarten map
The Weingarten map curlyW is self-adjoint.

A
use the basis {σ_u(u0,v0),σ_v(u0,v0)}
of the tangent space
t_(u0,v0) σ wrt this basis
suppose 
X=
[a]
[b]

Y=
[c]
[d]

curlyW_(u0,v0)(X)·Y=
I(W(X), Y)
because the FFF by definition is Dot product with respect to basis {σ_u,σ_v}

=(W(X))^T I(Y) = X^T W^T I(Y)
5.22
=X^T (I^-1 II)^T I(Y)
=X^T II^T(I^-1)^T  I(Y)
*FFF I and II are symmetric so transpose same
= X^T II I^-1 IX = X^T II Y
=X^T II^T Y
=(Y^T II X)^T
as is a 1x1 matrix
=Y^T II X
=I(W(Y),X)
= W_(u0,v0)(Y)· X

curlyW**

(inner prod of col vectors: I(X,Y) = X^T I Y )

21
Q

Definition 5.5.1.

Define the normal curvature at (u_0, v_0)

A

For σ : U → R^3 a regular parametrized surface, (u0, v0) ∈ U and X a unit tangent vector at (u0, v0), the plane spanned by X and
n(u0, v0) intersects with σ(U) along a (plane) curve C_X.

For α < 0 < β, let
γ: ]α, β[ → R^3 be a unit-speed parametrization of C_X near σ(u0, v0) with
γ(0) = σ(u0, v0) and γ˙(0) = X. Define the normal curvature at (u0, v0) in
the direction X to be the curvature of γ at (u0, v0):

κ_n(X) = γ¨(0) · n(u0, v0)

We can use the curvature of planar curves we studied before to measure
how the surface curves in a specified direction at any point
*from direction in tangent space (giving out) direction in tangent space

  • form plane B containing x and n(u0,v0) through σ(u0,v0), point on our surface A
  • take a unit speed parametrization
22
Q

normal curvature directions

A

So κn(X) is given a positive sign if C_X bends towards n(u0, v0),

and a negative
sign if C_X bends away from n(u0, v0).

*curvature of line of intersection between plane A and plane B

23
Q

Theorem 5.5.2.

Normal curvatures can be
computed from ….

A

For σ : U → R^3
a parametrized surface, (u0, v0) ∈ U and X a unit tangent vector at (u0, v0), the normal curvature in the direction X has the following expression:

κn(X) = curlyW_(u0,v0)(X) · X .

24
Q

proof of

Theorem 5.5.2.

Normal curvatures can be
computed from ….

A

κn(X)curvature defined normal curvature in the X Direction=γ¨(0) · n(u0, v0) where γ is defined in 5.5.1

use γ•(t) · n(γ(t))=0
γ•(0) · n(u0,v0)=x ·n=0

so

[d/dt |γ•(t) · n(γ(t))|_t=0 ]=0
and by the product rule
d/dt |γ•(t) · n(γ(t)) + γ•(t) ·d/dt(nγ(t)) |_t=0

LHS = curvature defined κn(X) normal curvature in the X Direction
RHS = γ•(0) • curlyW(X)
= X• curlyW(X)

as W is self adjoint

25
Q

Theorem 5.6.1.

when does V has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of curlyW

A

If V is a real vector space with inner product g and
curlyW : V → V
is a self-adjoint operator — so g(curlyW (X),Y) = g(X, curlyW (Y)) for all X,Y ∈ V —
then V has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of curlyW

e.g eigenvectors of curlyW are orthogonal and normal as in corollary 5.6.2

  • using κ as before as approximation
  • eigenvalues of curly w tell us about this curvature
  • normal @ each point bounded by eigen
26
Q

COROLLARY 5.6.2

orthonormal basis

A

For a parametrized surface σ : U → R^3
and for all (u0, v0) ∈ U,
there is an orthonormal basis (X1, X2) of T_ (u0,v0) σ of eigenvectors of W(u0,v0) with
eigenvalues κ1, κ2 ∈ R.

More explicitly, the vectors X1, X2 satisfy
curlyW_(u0,v0) (X_1) = κ1X1, curlyW_(u0,v0) (X2) = κ2X2,

X1 ⊥ X2 and ||X_1|| = ||X_2|| = 1.

27
Q

Theorem 5.6.4
proof

relationship
κmin κmax

A

x is a unit vector in T_σ (u_0,v_0)

{X_1, X_2} form an orthogonal basis of T_σ (u_0,v_0) so we can write
X=aX_1 +bX_2,

here ||X|| =X•X = 1 ie a^2 + b^2=1

κ_n(X) = curlyW(X)•X = curlyW(aX_1 +bX_2) •(aX_1 +bX_2)

(linear map curly w, curlyw*)
= [aW(X_1) +bW(X_2) ]•(aX_1 +bX_2)
= (aκ_1X_1 + bκX_2)•(aX_1 +bX_2)
= κ_1 a^2 + κ_2 b^2

κ_min = κ_min (a^2 +b^2) = κ_min a^2 + κ_min b^2  ≤
 κ_1 a^2 + κ_2 b^2
= κ_n (X)= κ_1 a^2 + κ_2 b^2
≤
 κ_max (a^2 +b^2) = κ_max
28
Q

Theorem 5.6.4

relationship
κmin κmax

A

. For (u0, v0) ∈ U and any unit tangent vector X ∈ T(u0,v0)σ we
have κmin ≤ κn(X) ≤ κmax

29
Q

Definition 5.6.3. κmax and min

A

We write

κmax = max{κ1, κ2} and

κmin = min{κ1, κ2}.

30
Q

Definition 5.6.5.

when κmax and min

equal or bigger than

A

(a) If κmax > κmin, then the values κmax and κmin are
called the principal curvatures at (u0, v0) and the corresponding Xmax
and Xmin are called principal vectors.
A vector X ∈ T_(u0,v0) σ is a
principal direction for κmin (respectively for κmax) if X is a nonzero multiple of Xmin (respectively Xmax).

(b) If κ := κmax = κmin, then the point (u0, v0) is called an umbilic point
of σ and all normal curvatures at (u0, v0) are equal to κ

*in other words X ∈ T_∈ T_σ (u_0,v_0) σis a principal Direction if it is an eigenvector not necessarily unit length for eigenvalues κ_min and κ_max

31
Q

5.6.6 remark

principal directions and principal vectors

A

when you have a principal directions eg V_1 amd V_2 to find principal vectors you must make them with unit length

X_1=V_1/||V_1||
X_2=V_2/||V_2||

32
Q

Example 5.6.7. Consider the parametrized cylinder in Example 3.3.5:
σ : R^2 → R^3
σ(t, θ) = (cos θ, sin θ, t).
Its principal curvatures and vectors are

A

κ_min(t, θ) = 0;
X_min(t, θ) = σ_t(t, θ);
κ_max(t, θ) = 1;
X_max(t, θ) = σ_θ (t, θ).

as
W=
[0 0]
[0  1]
this is diagnosed so we can read off the eigenvalue 0 and 1 and its corresponding eigenvectors are the basis vectors 
[ 1]  and [0]
[0]         [ 1]
so the principal directions and principal curvatures are
σ _t, 0 and σ_θ, 1 
But 
σ_t = (0,0,1)
σ_θ = (-sinθ, cosθ,0)
so ||σ_t || = 1 =||σ_θ||
  • eigenvalues 0 and 1 correspond to t Direction or theta Direction and most curved is the side of the cylinder
  • unit implies curvature is equal to 1/R
33
Q

Example 5.6.8. Consider the sphere S^2
(minus the North and South poles) with the parametrization
σ :]−π/2,π/2[× R → R^3

σ(φ, θ) = (cos φ cos θ, cos φ sin θ, sin φ).

κmax, κmin?

A

κmax = κmin

Each point is umbilical with κ = 1. This agrees with the intuition that S^2
bends by the same amount in all directions.

*from 5.3.3 W=identity Matrix
every vector is an eigenvector and Lambda = 1 (-1 or +1?)

34
Q

Example 5.6.9. Consider the parametrized catenoid in Example 4.4.3,
σ : R
2 → R
3
, σ(t, θ) = (cosh t cos θ, cosh t sin θ, t).

consider weingarten matrix and find principal curvatures and principal vectors

A

W_(t,θ) =
[−(cosh t)^−2 0 ]
[ 0 (cosh t)^-2]

The Weingarten matrix has eigenvectors and eigenvalues
(we read these off as it's diagonal)
κmin(t, θ) = −(cosh t)^−2,
[1]
[0]

κmax(t, θ) = (cosh t)^−2,
[0]
[ 1]

These data translate into principal curvatures and principal vectors as:
κmin(t, θ) = −(cosh t)^−2
Xmin(t, θ) = (1/cosh t)σ_t(t, θ);
κmax(t, θ) = (cosh t)^−2 Xmax(t, θ) = (1/cosh t)σ_θ (t, θ).

*principal directions are 1σ_t + 0σ_θ = σ_t
and
0σ_t + 1σ_θ= σ_θ
with respect to basis {σ_t,σ_θ}

previously found these

||σ_t||= cosh^2 t and
||σ_θ||=cosh^2 t

the principal vectors are (found by normalising these)
σ_t/cosh^2t and
σ_θ/cosh^2t

35
Q

Exercise 5.6.10. Consider the parametrized helicoid in Exercise 5.2.3:
σ : R^2 → R^3
σ(u, v) =
(v cos u, v sin u, u),

consider weingarten matrix and find principal curvatures and principal vectors

A

W_(u,v) =
[0 (1 + v^2)^−3/2 ]
[(1 + v^2)^−1/2 0 ]

Solve the characteristic equation to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors:

κ_max = (1+v^2)^-1

[ 1 ]
[ (1 + v^2)^1/2 ]

κ_min= -(1+v^2)^-1

[ 1 ]
[ -(1 + v^2)^1/2 ]

principal vectors:
….
Xmax(u, v) = (1/√[2(v^2+1)])(σ_u(u, v) + √[1 + v^2]σv(u, v))

Xmin(u, v) = (1/√[2(v^2+1)])(σ_u(u, v) - √[1 + v^2]σv(u, v))

36
Q

Definition 5.7.1.

Gaussian curvature

A

For a parametrized surface σ : U → R^3, let κmin, κmax : U →
R be the (possibly equal) principal curvatures.

The Gaussian curvature
K: U → R is defined as
K = κminκmax

37
Q

Proposition 5.7.2. The Gaussian curvature and weingarten

A

The Gaussian curvature is the determinant of the Weingarten:
K = det W = W_11_W22 − W_12W_21.

By construction, the Gaussian curvature is the product of the eigenvalues of
the Weingarten matrix

This means that the Gaussian curvature can be computed without computing
the principal curvatures. It can also be computed without computing the
Weingarten.

proof:
the determinant of a matrix is the product of the eigenvalues
*product of two principal curvatures which could be equal is the eigenvalues product which is also equal to the determinant

38
Q

Proposition 5.7.3.

gaussian curvature computed without computing the
Weingarten.

A

Since W = I^−1 · II, the Gaussian curvature can be expressed as the ratio of determinants of the two fundamental forms:

K = [det II]/[det I]

proof: det(W)= det(I^-1 II)
=(detI)^-1(det II)= [det II]/[det I]

39
Q

Example 5.7.4.

Gaussian curvature of the cylinder is

A

By Example 5.3.2, the Gaussian curvature of the cylinder is 0 everywhere.
for the cylinder W_(u,v)=
[0 0]
[0 1] for all (u,v)

so determinant equals 0 for all

40
Q

Example 5.7.5

Gaussian curvature of the sphere S^2

A

By Example 5.3.3, the Gaussian curvature of the sphere S^2 is 1 everywhere.

K(u,v)=K=det(
[1 0]
[0 1]) =1 for all (u,v)

ie all points have same on sphere

41
Q

Exercise 5.7.6. Compute the Gaussian curvature of the catenoid (Example
4.4.3).

A

for the catenoid
K(t,θ) = detW cosh^-4 (t)
negative and tends to 0

if K bigger than 0 then κn(X) is positive and C_X bends towards n(u0, v0),
if K less than 0 then κn(X) is negative and C_X bends away from n(u0, v0),

  • Suppose κmin, κmax bigger than 0 so Kn(X) bigger than 0 for all directions and always bend towards normal
  • suppose κmin less than 0 less than κmax: we have a saddle bend towards / away in One Direction and another in other, K less than 0 C_X bends away from n(u0, v0)
  • Suppose κmin, κmax less than zero then bend away from the normal and K is bigger than 0

shape flatter at ends

42
Q

The sign of the curvature K says something about the shape of a surface

A

If K > 0 at a point then the principal curvatures are of the
same sign. Then by Theorem 5.6.4 all normal curvatures are also of the same
sign. So the surface bends towards the same side of the tangent plane in all
directions, i.e. it looks like a bowl near the point. If K < 0 at a point then
the principal curvatures are of opposite signs. So the surface bends towards
different sides of the tangent plane in different directions, i.e. it looks like a
saddle near the point.

43
Q

Theorem 5.7.7 (The Brioschi formula).

A
Let σ : U → R3 be a parametrized  surface and write, as usual, 
[E(u,v) F(u,v)]
[F(u,v) G(u,v)]
for the first fundamental form. Then the Gaussian curvature has the following formula:
K =
[
|-0.5E_vv+F_uv      −0.5G_uu  
         0.5Eu Fu− 0.5E_v|
|Fv−0.5Gu      E      F|
|0.5G_v         F      G|


| 0 0.5E_v G_u|
|0.5E_v E F |
|0.5G_u F G |

]
/
(EG − F^2)^2

This is not very useful for computation

44
Q

Corollary 5.7.8 (Gauss’ Theorema Egregium)

A

The Gaussian curvature of a
parametrized surface in is completely determined by its first fundamental form

This means that an ant living on the surface which is able to measure distances, but not know about the embedding in to R3, can not calculate
the principal curvatures but can calculate the Gaussian curvature

45
Q

Theorem 5.7.9.

A

There is no local isometry U→ R^3 which has part of the sphere as its image.

proof:
*if σ is a local isometry then we have shown that FFF is identity matrix everywhere. this is constant and by 5.7 .7 we find gaussian curvature K= 0.

but for the sphere K=1, so we cannot have a local isometry to the sphere.

46
Q

Corollary 5.7.10.

A

There is no map of part of the Earth which correctly represents distances.

*as a local isometry preserves distances

47
Q

principal directions and eigenvectors

geometric meaning

A
As W(u0,v0) is the matrix of curlyW_(u0,v0): T_(u0,v0) σ → T_(u0,v0) σ with
respect the basis {σ_u(u0, v0), σ_v(u0, v0)} 
we have
aσ_u(u0, v0) + bσ_v(u0, v0)is a principal direction
⇐⇒
[a]
[b]
is an eigenvector for W(u0,v0)

*the principal directions of vectors point in directions that surface is curling most positively X_max and most negatively X_min

48
Q

principal directions vs principal vectors

A

eigenvectors (1,0) and (0,1)

*principal directions are 1σ_t + 0σ_θ = σ_t
and
0σ_t + 1σ_θ= σ_θ
with respect to basis {σ_t,σ_θ}

the principal vectors are (found by normalising these)
σ_t/cosh^2t and
σ_θ/cosh^2t

normalise principal direction to get principal vector

principal directions are these eigenvectors wrt basis